HomeForumCasinosExecution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary

Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 99)

623,173 views 2,736 replies |
4 years ago
|
1...98 99 100...138
Add post
1 year ago
deus

https://www.kleinezeitung.at/wirtschaft/gaming/19018815/laut-gericht-lootboxen-in-fifa-sind-kein-gluecksspiel


Hope lost for loot boxes

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Have you seen the video yet?

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

It's not online yet, is it?

Automatic translation:
HugoH
1 year ago

Nope

1 year ago
deus

"BREAKING NEWS"


I'm curious to see what happens...

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Pretty cheeky that nothing is coming, right?

Automatic translation:
justus99
1 year ago
deus

I'm really curious what won't be said again

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Video is online!

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

it's online!

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

And what do you say about the information?

Automatic translation:
max888
1 year ago
deus

I don't think that casinos will suddenly offer comparisons now.


They have blocked and ignored everything for years, so they certainly won't start looking for a solution for the benefit of the players now.


Even in Germany, where many big players now have a license, judgments are not paid.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

There were some individual comparisons.

Automatic translation:
max888
1 year ago
deus

As far as I know, after the introduction of Bill 55, everything concerning cash flows has stopped.

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus

Someone here in the forum said he got something back.

Automatic translation:
HugoH
1 year ago
deus

No, there were isolated comparisons, we also mentioned in the videos again and again that it is not completely stalled and some providers still compare

Automatic translation:
Stefan123450
1 year ago
deus

I can only say what I was told. Suppliers who would otherwise have compared prices have completely stopped being willing to negotiate because of Bill55.

Automatic translation:
HugoH
1 year ago
deus

That was to be expected, but if the ECJ finally rejects it - and that is as certain as the amen in church - most of them will be extremely embarrassed. I also think that many are delaying things so that they can build up huge reserves. They know that we have to pay this much, etc. So it could be like that. Very few will go bankrupt, and the big ones certainly won't. Even if they do go bankrupt, you can do it through the managing directors, they are just as liable.

Best regards

Automatic translation:
Anonymized760
1 year ago
deus

Hello! Holding the managing director liable is very complicated under German law, says my lawyer.


In Austria, for example, it is legally more obvious.


I don't think the OCs will pay before the ECJ's decision.


greetings back

Automatic translation:
1 year ago
deus
Automatic translation:
voizua92
1 year ago
deus

Doesn't sound good when the bankruptcies are mentioned... The last paragraph also sounds negative...

It's a shame, but it was also somehow clear that the casinos would think of everything to avoid having to pay.

Automatic translation:
1...98 99 100...138
Go to pageof 138 pages

Add post

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback
Sweet Boanza 2500_Push
Share your wins on Pragmatic Play slots, get another chance for winning with Casino Guru!

Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more