ForumCasinosExecution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary

Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 99)

3 years ago by marketingskislo
|
232951 views 1996 replies |
|
1...98 99 100
3 weeks ago

https://www.kleinezeitung.at/wirtschaft/gaming/19018815/laut-gericht-lootboxen-in-fifa-sind-kein-gluecksspiel


Hope lost for loot boxes

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

Have you seen the video yet?

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

It's not online yet, is it?

Automatic translation:
harryhugo1982
3 weeks ago

Nope

3 weeks ago

"BREAKING NEWS"


I'm curious to see what happens...

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

Pretty cheeky that nothing is coming, right?

Automatic translation:
justus99
3 weeks ago

I'm really curious what won't be said again

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

Video is online!

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

it's online!

Automatic translation:
2 weeks ago

And what do you say about the information?

Automatic translation:
max888
2 weeks ago

I don't think that casinos will suddenly offer comparisons now.


They have blocked and ignored everything for years, so they certainly won't start looking for a solution for the benefit of the players now.


Even in Germany, where many big players now have a license, judgments are not paid.

Automatic translation:
2 weeks ago

There were some individual comparisons.

Automatic translation:
max888
2 weeks ago

As far as I know, after the introduction of Bill 55, everything concerning cash flows has stopped.

Automatic translation:
2 weeks ago

Someone here in the forum said he got something back.

Automatic translation:
harryhugo1982
2 weeks ago

No, there were isolated comparisons, we also mentioned in the videos again and again that it is not completely stalled and some providers still compare

Automatic translation:
Stefan123450
2 weeks ago

I can only say what I was told. Suppliers who would otherwise have compared prices have completely stopped being willing to negotiate because of Bill55.

Automatic translation:
harryhugo1982
2 weeks ago

That was to be expected, but if the ECJ finally rejects it - and that is as certain as the amen in church - most of them will be extremely embarrassed. I also think that many are delaying things so that they can build up huge reserves. They know that we have to pay this much, etc. So it could be like that. Very few will go bankrupt, and the big ones certainly won't. Even if they do go bankrupt, you can do it through the managing directors, they are just as liable.

Best regards

Automatic translation:
abelinglaekamp
2 weeks ago

Hello! Holding the managing director liable is very complicated under German law, says my lawyer.


In Austria, for example, it is legally more obvious.


I don't think the OCs will pay before the ECJ's decision.


greetings back

Automatic translation:
1 week ago
Automatic translation:
voizua92
1 week ago

Doesn't sound good when the bankruptcies are mentioned... The last paragraph also sounds negative...

It's a shame, but it was also somehow clear that the casinos would think of everything to avoid having to pay.

Automatic translation:
1...98 99 100
Go to pageof 100 pages

Join the community

You must be logged in to add a post.

Sign up
flash-message-news
Don’t miss any news from the gambling industry
SGW_new_push_alt
It’s Safer Gambling Week! Play a quick card game to test your gambling style.
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback
Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more
Subscribe to our newsletter for newest no deposit bonuses, new slots, and other news