Hello to the player and the community,
Hello to the Casino Guru team,
As the Head of VIP at NewLucky Casino, this case was brought to my attention during our regular monitoring of player feedback and continuous efforts to improve the quality of our service. I reviewed the complete complaint history, correspondence, and the actions taken by our team. This required more time than the standard response window, but in certain cases, accuracy and a thorough approach are more important than speed. My intention is always to provide the highest possible level of service.
Below are the final conclusions I have reached. These decisions are final.
1. Regarding the GEO restrictions
We did indeed close access from the GEO where the player previously logged in. This was a global business decision and was not aimed at any specific individual. We understand this may have caused difficulties when attempting to log in.
The player’s account remains open and accessible. In 2025, changing an IP address does not present any technical difficulty.
2. On the reasons for the GEO restrictions
While I am not required to publicly disclose the internal logic behind such decisions, I can note that they are primarily based on two factors:
- prioritizing the markets where we plan long-term development,
- and the increasing number of players attempting to systematically abuse bonus policies.
These measures are in place to maintain a fair and sustainable gaming environment.
3. Regarding the partial confiscation of winnings
After a full review of the case, I have overturned the previous decision to confiscate part of the player’s winnings.
Believe me, casinos in this industry have many legitimate grounds to apply such measures, and decisions of this kind are taken only when absolutely necessary. In this particular case, I do not see grounds to maintain the confiscation.
The funds will be returned to the player’s account shortly.
4. Regarding the withdrawal
The player was repeatedly asked to provide bank details needed to process a fiat withdrawal. We have never received a reply, even though our emails were successfully delivered.
The complaint was initiated on the basis that the player wishes to withdraw the winnings in cryptocurrency, however such an option is not available.
This is the only reason for the delay. Without bank details we cannot proceed, and this step is entirely on the player’s side.
5. AML requirements
The player’s request to deposit in EUR and withdraw in cryptocurrency falls under AML restrictions.
The industry gold standard is straightforward:
withdrawals must be processed to the same payment method used for deposits.
This is a mandatory requirement, not an internal preference.
Conclusion
As the facts clearly show, the issue is not that the casino is refusing to pay the player.
The only cause of delay is that the player has not provided the bank details required for a fiat withdrawal.
On our side, I have:
- reversed the confiscation,
- arranged for the funds to be returned to the player’s account,
- clarified how the player can access the account again,
- and confirmed that the withdrawal will be processed as soon as we receive the necessary banking information.
I do not see any grounds to continue discussing this case within the complaint thread.
Kind regards,
Head of VIP
NewLucky Casino
Hello to the player and the community,
Hello to the Casino Guru team,
As the Head of VIP at NewLucky Casino, this case was brought to my attention during our regular monitoring of player feedback and continuous efforts to improve the quality of our service. I reviewed the complete complaint history, correspondence, and the actions taken by our team. This required more time than the standard response window, but in certain cases, accuracy and a thorough approach are more important than speed. My intention is always to provide the highest possible level of service.
Below are the final conclusions I have reached. These decisions are final.
1. Regarding the GEO restrictions
We did indeed close access from the GEO where the player previously logged in. This was a global business decision and was not aimed at any specific individual. We understand this may have caused difficulties when attempting to log in.
The player’s account remains open and accessible. In 2025, changing an IP address does not present any technical difficulty.
2. On the reasons for the GEO restrictions
While I am not required to publicly disclose the internal logic behind such decisions, I can note that they are primarily based on two factors:
- prioritizing the markets where we plan long-term development,
- and the increasing number of players attempting to systematically abuse bonus policies.
These measures are in place to maintain a fair and sustainable gaming environment.
3. Regarding the partial confiscation of winnings
After a full review of the case, I have overturned the previous decision to confiscate part of the player’s winnings.
Believe me, casinos in this industry have many legitimate grounds to apply such measures, and decisions of this kind are taken only when absolutely necessary. In this particular case, I do not see grounds to maintain the confiscation.
The funds will be returned to the player’s account shortly.
4. Regarding the withdrawal
The player was repeatedly asked to provide bank details needed to process a fiat withdrawal. We have never received a reply, even though our emails were successfully delivered.
The complaint was initiated on the basis that the player wishes to withdraw the winnings in cryptocurrency, however such an option is not available.
This is the only reason for the delay. Without bank details we cannot proceed, and this step is entirely on the player’s side.
5. AML requirements
The player’s request to deposit in EUR and withdraw in cryptocurrency falls under AML restrictions.
The industry gold standard is straightforward:
withdrawals must be processed to the same payment method used for deposits.
This is a mandatory requirement, not an internal preference.
Conclusion
As the facts clearly show, the issue is not that the casino is refusing to pay the player.
The only cause of delay is that the player has not provided the bank details required for a fiat withdrawal.
On our side, I have:
- reversed the confiscation,
- arranged for the funds to be returned to the player’s account,
- clarified how the player can access the account again,
- and confirmed that the withdrawal will be processed as soon as we receive the necessary banking information.
I do not see any grounds to continue discussing this case within the complaint thread.
Kind regards,
Head of VIP
NewLucky Casino