Dear Katarina,
Thank you for your prompt response.
Please find below the clarifications you requested.
1. Did I ever request a self-exclusion from MyStake while mentioning a gambling problem?
Yes. I clearly informed the casino that I was a problem gambler.
In March, shortly after registering, I told them that gambling was harming my life and my daughter’s. At that time, my net losses were around €40,000, and I explicitly mentioned this in the same conversation. Unfortunately, I do not have a screenshot of that chat — it is one of the transcripts MyStake refuses to provide despite my GDPR request.
I also mentioned my gambling problem during several later chats up until 31 May.
Only then did the casino close my account immediately after I raised the issue again.
This demonstrates two essential points:
In March, when losses were still moderate relative to the final amount, they did not act, and allowed months of further deposits.
On 31 May, they finally acted — showing that they knew exactly what they should have done earlier.
2. Do I possess all conversations mentioning this?
No. I only have the conversations that I managed to screenshot, notably:
A full chat from 29 April, where I discussed my losses, my financial situation and the withdrawal limits.
The final chat from 31 May, after which the casino closed the account.
However, I do not have every conversation in which I reported my addiction because the casino:
deletes transcripts, and
refused to provide them under GDPR despite multiple formal requests.
The missing March chat is particularly important, as it proves that the casino allowed months of additional deposits despite an early warning.
3. Is my account blocked now?
Yes. It was closed immediately after my message on 31 May, where I again raised my gambling problem.
4. When was the last time the casino allowed me to deposit?
On 31 May, the same day the account was closed.
This means they continued allowing deposits up to the last minute, even though I had repeatedly signalled a gambling addiction.
The sequence is therefore:
March → first addiction disclosure → account stays open → deposits continue
End of May → addiction disclosed again → account suddenly closed
This inconsistency strongly suggests that MyStake knowingly allowed vulnerable play for months.
B. Arbitrary withdrawal limits
MyStake repeatedly blocked my attempts to withdraw large balances (often over €100,000), claiming fixed limits of:
€7,500/week
€15,000/month
However, on 29 April, they suddenly changed these limits to:
€30,000/week
€50,000/month
I also managed to withdraw €32,000, contradicting the previously stated fixed limits.
This shows the withdrawal policy was not contractual, not transparent and applied arbitrarily, which is incompatible with responsible gambling and consumer protection standards.
C. Crypto withdrawal limits were inconsistent
Crypto withdrawals typically do not have regulatory ceilings.
Yet MyStake still imposed restrictive caps, without explaining the criteria or rationale.
D. No AML or affordability checks
I deposited approximately €400,000 in under four months, using:
a French ID
a French IBAN
Visa/Mastercard
cryptocurrency
Despite this, the casino performed:
no source-of-funds verification,
no affordability assessment,
no cooling-off periods,
no deposit limits,
no intervention, despite multiple red flags.
This is extremely concerning from both AML and responsible gambling perspectives.
E. All transactions were clearly identifiable as French
Despite MyStake being blocked by the French regulator (ANJ), the casino:
accepted deposits from French bank cards,
paid withdrawals to a French IBAN,
verified my French passport.
This shows they knowingly allowed access from a prohibited jurisdiction while simultaneously failing to apply responsible gambling safeguards.
Thanks
Dear Katarina,
Thank you for your prompt response.
Please find below the clarifications you requested.
1. Did I ever request a self-exclusion from MyStake while mentioning a gambling problem?
Yes. I clearly informed the casino that I was a problem gambler.
In March, shortly after registering, I told them that gambling was harming my life and my daughter’s. At that time, my net losses were around €40,000, and I explicitly mentioned this in the same conversation. Unfortunately, I do not have a screenshot of that chat — it is one of the transcripts MyStake refuses to provide despite my GDPR request.
I also mentioned my gambling problem during several later chats up until 31 May.
Only then did the casino close my account immediately after I raised the issue again.
This demonstrates two essential points:
In March, when losses were still moderate relative to the final amount, they did not act, and allowed months of further deposits.
On 31 May, they finally acted — showing that they knew exactly what they should have done earlier.
2. Do I possess all conversations mentioning this?
No. I only have the conversations that I managed to screenshot, notably:
A full chat from 29 April, where I discussed my losses, my financial situation and the withdrawal limits.
The final chat from 31 May, after which the casino closed the account.
However, I do not have every conversation in which I reported my addiction because the casino:
deletes transcripts, and
refused to provide them under GDPR despite multiple formal requests.
The missing March chat is particularly important, as it proves that the casino allowed months of additional deposits despite an early warning.
3. Is my account blocked now?
Yes. It was closed immediately after my message on 31 May, where I again raised my gambling problem.
4. When was the last time the casino allowed me to deposit?
On 31 May, the same day the account was closed.
This means they continued allowing deposits up to the last minute, even though I had repeatedly signalled a gambling addiction.
The sequence is therefore:
March → first addiction disclosure → account stays open → deposits continue
End of May → addiction disclosed again → account suddenly closed
This inconsistency strongly suggests that MyStake knowingly allowed vulnerable play for months.
B. Arbitrary withdrawal limits
MyStake repeatedly blocked my attempts to withdraw large balances (often over €100,000), claiming fixed limits of:
€7,500/week
€15,000/month
However, on 29 April, they suddenly changed these limits to:
€30,000/week
€50,000/month
I also managed to withdraw €32,000, contradicting the previously stated fixed limits.
This shows the withdrawal policy was not contractual, not transparent and applied arbitrarily, which is incompatible with responsible gambling and consumer protection standards.
C. Crypto withdrawal limits were inconsistent
Crypto withdrawals typically do not have regulatory ceilings.
Yet MyStake still imposed restrictive caps, without explaining the criteria or rationale.
D. No AML or affordability checks
I deposited approximately €400,000 in under four months, using:
a French ID
a French IBAN
Visa/Mastercard
cryptocurrency
Despite this, the casino performed:
no source-of-funds verification,
no affordability assessment,
no cooling-off periods,
no deposit limits,
no intervention, despite multiple red flags.
This is extremely concerning from both AML and responsible gambling perspectives.
E. All transactions were clearly identifiable as French
Despite MyStake being blocked by the French regulator (ANJ), the casino:
accepted deposits from French bank cards,
paid withdrawals to a French IBAN,
verified my French passport.
This shows they knowingly allowed access from a prohibited jurisdiction while simultaneously failing to apply responsible gambling safeguards.
Thanks