Dear Miidelgado,
Firstly, I kindly ask that we keep our communication constructive and to the point. I appreciate the effort you’ve invested in reviewing our complaints procedures and case history. However, in order to move this case forward, we require concrete, verifiable information rather than unclear or contradictory statements.
At this stage, we are still missing several essential elements:
- Initial self-exclusion request (September 2023)
You have provided emails confirming that your account was later closed, but we do not yet have the original self-exclusion request itself. Without this, we cannot verify whether you explicitly indicated a gambling problem at the time of your request — which is critical for us to proceed.
Contrary to your statement, we do require confirmation of the disputed amount in every relevant complaint. This information is necessary to assess refund eligibility. Please note that even if we conclude you are eligible, we cannot compel the casino to pay any arbitrary amount, only the sum that can be substantiated as unjustly lost.
- Timeline of events and account history
The chronology you have provided remains unclear. Information about different accounts, dates, and self-exclusion periods appears inconsistent. For example:
- Your initial account (76996082) was closed following your September 2023 self-exclusion request.
- On the same day, you created another account (77605294) "to test if self-exclusion works."
- On May 1, 2025, live chat records show that support staff could not initially locate your account, later found it, and advised you to create a new one.
- In May, you also stated that your most recent account was subject to a six-month self-exclusion, valid until November 19, 2025.
What remains unclear is: which account(s) are you claiming remain active, how many accounts have you created in total, and which specific account(s) are relevant to this complaint. Please provide a clear, chronological summary.
Our goal is to assist you, but in order to do so, we need complete, consistent, and verifiable information.
Thank you.
Dear Leon Casino,
We would appreciate your assistance in clarifying this case.
Could you please check your database to determine whether any current accounts belonging to this player exist? In addition, we need official documentation regarding the recent change in ownership. Specifically, we would like clarity on whether the transfer of ownership affected all player records or only certain categories such as self-exclusion data. It is important to know whether records were deleted, preserved, or fully transferred to the new owner.
As you understand, we cannot rely solely on verbal assurances of an ownership change when assessing responsibility. For this reason, we kindly ask you to provide formal proof of the change, along with details of how player records - especially those related to self-exclusions - have been handled since the transfer.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Dear Miidelgado,
Firstly, I kindly ask that we keep our communication constructive and to the point. I appreciate the effort you’ve invested in reviewing our complaints procedures and case history. However, in order to move this case forward, we require concrete, verifiable information rather than unclear or contradictory statements.
At this stage, we are still missing several essential elements:
- Initial self-exclusion request (September 2023)
You have provided emails confirming that your account was later closed, but we do not yet have the original self-exclusion request itself. Without this, we cannot verify whether you explicitly indicated a gambling problem at the time of your request — which is critical for us to proceed.
Contrary to your statement, we do require confirmation of the disputed amount in every relevant complaint. This information is necessary to assess refund eligibility. Please note that even if we conclude you are eligible, we cannot compel the casino to pay any arbitrary amount, only the sum that can be substantiated as unjustly lost.
- Timeline of events and account history
The chronology you have provided remains unclear. Information about different accounts, dates, and self-exclusion periods appears inconsistent. For example:
- Your initial account (76996082) was closed following your September 2023 self-exclusion request.
- On the same day, you created another account (77605294) "to test if self-exclusion works."
- On May 1, 2025, live chat records show that support staff could not initially locate your account, later found it, and advised you to create a new one.
- In May, you also stated that your most recent account was subject to a six-month self-exclusion, valid until November 19, 2025.
What remains unclear is: which account(s) are you claiming remain active, how many accounts have you created in total, and which specific account(s) are relevant to this complaint. Please provide a clear, chronological summary.
Our goal is to assist you, but in order to do so, we need complete, consistent, and verifiable information.
Thank you.
Dear Leon Casino,
We would appreciate your assistance in clarifying this case.
Could you please check your database to determine whether any current accounts belonging to this player exist? In addition, we need official documentation regarding the recent change in ownership. Specifically, we would like clarity on whether the transfer of ownership affected all player records or only certain categories such as self-exclusion data. It is important to know whether records were deleted, preserved, or fully transferred to the new owner.
As you understand, we cannot rely solely on verbal assurances of an ownership change when assessing responsibility. For this reason, we kindly ask you to provide formal proof of the change, along with details of how player records - especially those related to self-exclusions - have been handled since the transfer.
Thank you for your cooperation.