Hello Lcass17,
Thank you for your follow-up messages. After carefully reviewing all the information provided by both sides, we must clarify our final position on this complaint.
You confirmed that another person accessed the casino from your browser/device. This point is crucial. According to the casino’s investigation, the case is not based on assumptions but on multiple matching technical and transactional indicators, namely:
- The same device ID was used to access two different casino accounts
- The same IP address was used to log into both accounts
- Both accounts were funded from the same wallet
This combination of factors extends far beyond a simple IP coincidence and strongly suggests that the same person controlled both accounts. The casino has also confirmed that relevant evidence supporting these findings was shared with Casino Guru privately.
Regarding your argument that the account should have been closed earlier: casinos are not obliged to detect or act on violations immediately. Once a breach of the Terms and Conditions is identified and confirmed, the casino is entitled to take action, including account closure and confiscation of funds, as clearly stated in their rules.
For these reasons, we cannot consider this complaint justified, and we must side with the casino in this matter.
Best regards,
Casino.Guru Team
Hello Lcass17,
Thank you for your follow-up messages. After carefully reviewing all the information provided by both sides, we must clarify our final position on this complaint.
You confirmed that another person accessed the casino from your browser/device. This point is crucial. According to the casino’s investigation, the case is not based on assumptions but on multiple matching technical and transactional indicators, namely:
- The same device ID was used to access two different casino accounts
- The same IP address was used to log into both accounts
- Both accounts were funded from the same wallet
This combination of factors extends far beyond a simple IP coincidence and strongly suggests that the same person controlled both accounts. The casino has also confirmed that relevant evidence supporting these findings was shared with Casino Guru privately.
Regarding your argument that the account should have been closed earlier: casinos are not obliged to detect or act on violations immediately. Once a breach of the Terms and Conditions is identified and confirmed, the casino is entitled to take action, including account closure and confiscation of funds, as clearly stated in their rules.
For these reasons, we cannot consider this complaint justified, and we must side with the casino in this matter.
Best regards,
Casino.Guru Team