Dear Casino Guru Team,
I am seeking your help in recovering a balance of €360 that was confiscated by Gamblits Casino without proper justification.
In mid-May, I deposited approximately €500 and accepted their deposit bonus offer. I completed the wagering requirement using games that were explicitly listed as eligible at the time, including titles from Hacksaw Gaming such as Wheel and Mines. By the time I fulfilled the bonus conditions, I had lost all of my real funds, and my remaining €360 in bonus funds was converted into real balance.
On June 15, I submitted a withdrawal request for this balance. However, the following day (June 16), I discovered that my account had been blocked, and the withdrawal had not been processed. I attempted to reach customer support via live chat, but it was unavailable, so I sent an email requesting information about both the account block and the status of my withdrawal.
On June 18, I received a response from the casino accusing me of "bonus abuse" and informing me that my €360 balance had been confiscated.
I firmly reject this accusation. I complied fully with the Terms and Conditions that were in effect at the time I played. Upon reviewing the current version of their Terms, I noticed that they have since added a new clause specifically addressing "bonus abuse," which was not present during my gameplay. I responded on the same day, June 18, pointing out that retroactively applying new rules to past activity is deeply unfair, and I requested a proper justification based on the Terms that were active when I completed the wagering.
In their reply on June 19, they referred to clauses 9.8 and 4, citing a longer excerpt from their Terms and Conditions. For the sake of relevance, I am only including the specific parts they appeared to rely on in relation to my case:
"9.8. Please note that we cannot guarantee successful processing of withdrawals or refunds in the event if you breach the Restricted Use policy stated in Clauses 3.3 and 4."
[...]
"4.1. Restrictions: You shall not:"
[...]
"4.1.7: Engage in activities that might be perceived as attempts to cheat the Service [...]"
This is the only clause that could even vaguely be applied to my case, and I believe it is far too vague and subjective to justify confiscating a legitimate balance. The wording refers to "activities that might be perceived as attempts to cheat," which open to arbitrary interpretation. Playing permitted games that were clearly marked as eligible for bonus wagering should not reasonably be classified under such a clause.
I responded again on June 19, restating my position and requesting specific details about how my activity breached their rules. On June 20, they replied stating that their decision was final and would not be changed.
It appears that Gamblits Casino is using vague and overly broad terms to justify the confiscation of player funds and the closure of accounts. In this case, they have refused to reference any concrete or applicable rule that was actually in place at the time of gameplay.
I would greatly appreciate your assessment of whether this practice can be considered fair, and I ask for your assistance in recovering the €360 that is owed to me.
For reference, I have attached the full email correspondence between myself and Gamblits Casino, including all responses and my attempts to resolve the issue directly.
Best regards,
Mannfred
Dear Casino Guru Team,
I am seeking your help in recovering a balance of €360 that was confiscated by Gamblits Casino without proper justification.
In mid-May, I deposited approximately €500 and accepted their deposit bonus offer. I completed the wagering requirement using games that were explicitly listed as eligible at the time, including titles from Hacksaw Gaming such as Wheel and Mines. By the time I fulfilled the bonus conditions, I had lost all of my real funds, and my remaining €360 in bonus funds was converted into real balance.
On June 15, I submitted a withdrawal request for this balance. However, the following day (June 16), I discovered that my account had been blocked, and the withdrawal had not been processed. I attempted to reach customer support via live chat, but it was unavailable, so I sent an email requesting information about both the account block and the status of my withdrawal.
On June 18, I received a response from the casino accusing me of "bonus abuse" and informing me that my €360 balance had been confiscated.
I firmly reject this accusation. I complied fully with the Terms and Conditions that were in effect at the time I played. Upon reviewing the current version of their Terms, I noticed that they have since added a new clause specifically addressing "bonus abuse," which was not present during my gameplay. I responded on the same day, June 18, pointing out that retroactively applying new rules to past activity is deeply unfair, and I requested a proper justification based on the Terms that were active when I completed the wagering.
In their reply on June 19, they referred to clauses 9.8 and 4, citing a longer excerpt from their Terms and Conditions. For the sake of relevance, I am only including the specific parts they appeared to rely on in relation to my case:
"9.8. Please note that we cannot guarantee successful processing of withdrawals or refunds in the event if you breach the Restricted Use policy stated in Clauses 3.3 and 4."
[...]
"4.1. Restrictions: You shall not:"
[...]
"4.1.7: Engage in activities that might be perceived as attempts to cheat the Service [...]"
This is the only clause that could even vaguely be applied to my case, and I believe it is far too vague and subjective to justify confiscating a legitimate balance. The wording refers to "activities that might be perceived as attempts to cheat," which open to arbitrary interpretation. Playing permitted games that were clearly marked as eligible for bonus wagering should not reasonably be classified under such a clause.
I responded again on June 19, restating my position and requesting specific details about how my activity breached their rules. On June 20, they replied stating that their decision was final and would not be changed.
It appears that Gamblits Casino is using vague and overly broad terms to justify the confiscation of player funds and the closure of accounts. In this case, they have refused to reference any concrete or applicable rule that was actually in place at the time of gameplay.
I would greatly appreciate your assessment of whether this practice can be considered fair, and I ask for your assistance in recovering the €360 that is owed to me.
For reference, I have attached the full email correspondence between myself and Gamblits Casino, including all responses and my attempts to resolve the issue directly.
Best regards,
Mannfred