Hello Casino.Guru Complaint Team,
I am submitting this complaint regarding a serious responsible gambling failure by Bitz Casino.
This is not a dispute about normal gambling losses. It concerns Bitz’s refusal to apply permanent self-exclusion after explicit disclosure of gambling addiction, and their continued inducement to gamble through bonuses and promotions.
KEY FACTS
1. Gambling addiction disclosure
On January 14, 2026, I explicitly informed my assigned Bitz personal manager in writing that I suffer from gambling addiction (problem gambling).
2. Clear request for permanent self-exclusion
At the same time, I unambiguously requested permanent self-exclusion (lifetime account closure), without any possibility of reactivation.
3. Refusal of permanent exclusion
Bitz refused my request and stated that permanent/lifetime exclusion is not available under their policy. They offered only temporary breaks, with a maximum exclusion period of 6 months, and the account could be restored at any time.
4. Temporary restriction imposed without consent
Instead of applying permanent self-exclusion as requested, Bitz applied a temporary restriction until 20.07.2026, with the option of reactivation. I did not consent to this as a substitute for permanent exclusion.
5. Manual control confirmed
After requesting reactivation, Bitz manually restored my account within approximately one hour. This confirms that Bitz can restrict and restore accounts manually and promptly, meaning permanent closure could have been applied immediately when I disclosed addiction.
6. Continued bonuses and marketing after addiction disclosure
Despite my addiction disclosure and request for exclusion, Bitz continued sending bonus and promotional offers, including a no-deposit bonus, encouraging further gambling.
7. Losses after refusal
As a direct result of Bitz refusing permanent self-exclusion, my account remained active and I incurred losses of approximately $3,700 after January 14.
8. Operator’s official written position
Bitz has confirmed in writing that:
• permanent self-exclusion does not exist under their policy (maximum is 6 months)
• refunds of gambling losses are categorically refused "by principle"
REQUESTED RESOLUTION
I respectfully request:
• Refund of $3,700 (losses incurred after the refusal of permanent self-exclusion)
• Immediate permanent closure of my account without the possibility of restoration
• Written confirmation of responsible gambling safeguards applied
EVIDENCE AVAILABLE
I can provide:
• Written messages confirming addiction disclosure
• The refusal of permanent self-exclusion
• Bitz’s written statement that lifetime exclusion is not available
• Proof of continued bonus/promotional offers after disclosure
• Proof of manual account reactivation within one hour
• Deposit and loss records
This case demonstrates a systemic responsible gambling failure: an addicted player requested permanent exclusion, was refused, and was continuously encouraged to gamble.
Thank you for your assistance.
Kind regards,
Jurijs V.
Hello Casino.Guru Complaint Team,
I am submitting this complaint regarding a serious responsible gambling failure by Bitz Casino.
This is not a dispute about normal gambling losses. It concerns Bitz’s refusal to apply permanent self-exclusion after explicit disclosure of gambling addiction, and their continued inducement to gamble through bonuses and promotions.
KEY FACTS
1. Gambling addiction disclosure
On January 14, 2026, I explicitly informed my assigned Bitz personal manager in writing that I suffer from gambling addiction (problem gambling).
2. Clear request for permanent self-exclusion
At the same time, I unambiguously requested permanent self-exclusion (lifetime account closure), without any possibility of reactivation.
3. Refusal of permanent exclusion
Bitz refused my request and stated that permanent/lifetime exclusion is not available under their policy. They offered only temporary breaks, with a maximum exclusion period of 6 months, and the account could be restored at any time.
4. Temporary restriction imposed without consent
Instead of applying permanent self-exclusion as requested, Bitz applied a temporary restriction until 20.07.2026, with the option of reactivation. I did not consent to this as a substitute for permanent exclusion.
5. Manual control confirmed
After requesting reactivation, Bitz manually restored my account within approximately one hour. This confirms that Bitz can restrict and restore accounts manually and promptly, meaning permanent closure could have been applied immediately when I disclosed addiction.
6. Continued bonuses and marketing after addiction disclosure
Despite my addiction disclosure and request for exclusion, Bitz continued sending bonus and promotional offers, including a no-deposit bonus, encouraging further gambling.
7. Losses after refusal
As a direct result of Bitz refusing permanent self-exclusion, my account remained active and I incurred losses of approximately $3,700 after January 14.
8. Operator’s official written position
Bitz has confirmed in writing that:
• permanent self-exclusion does not exist under their policy (maximum is 6 months)
• refunds of gambling losses are categorically refused "by principle"
REQUESTED RESOLUTION
I respectfully request:
• Refund of $3,700 (losses incurred after the refusal of permanent self-exclusion)
• Immediate permanent closure of my account without the possibility of restoration
• Written confirmation of responsible gambling safeguards applied
EVIDENCE AVAILABLE
I can provide:
• Written messages confirming addiction disclosure
• The refusal of permanent self-exclusion
• Bitz’s written statement that lifetime exclusion is not available
• Proof of continued bonus/promotional offers after disclosure
• Proof of manual account reactivation within one hour
• Deposit and loss records
This case demonstrates a systemic responsible gambling failure: an addicted player requested permanent exclusion, was refused, and was continuously encouraged to gamble.
Thank you for your assistance.
Kind regards,
Jurijs V.
Edited by a Casino Guru admin