Rolling Slots Casino Review

The player from Denmark was missing 2250 DKK after a winning blackjack session. He had canceled a 2260 DKK withdrawal and placed bets totaling 4500 DKK, resulting in winnings of 8250 DKK, but his balance only showed 3760 DKK instead of the expected 6010 DKK. Despite support agreeing on the session details, they insisted the balance was correct. The issue was resolved after the casino corrected the balance, although the player remained dissatisfied with the casino's handling of the matter. The complaint was marked as resolved by us.

The player from British Columbia had deposited $30 and won but wasn't allowed to withdraw to the same payment method. The casino had asked him to deposit again via a different method and wager it thrice before he could access his winnings. The complaint was rejected because the player failed to respond to further messages and questions from the Complaints Team.

The player from Australia was facing issues with the casino's ID verification process for withdrawal. The casino allegedly wouldn't accept her government issued ID and insisted on a passport or license, which she couldn't provide. The casino's finance team had been unresponsive. After a series of correspondences, it was found that the player had submitted altered documents during the verification process, which was a clear violation of the casino's terms and conditions. As a result, we had to reject the complaint due to the violation.

The player from Austria was experiencing delayed withdrawal from the casino. Despite being fully verified and following the payout rules, he was not receiving daily payouts as promised. The casino responded by stating their terms and conditions, emphasizing their right to determine payment and withdrawal terms, and confirming the player's successful verification and two processed withdrawals. The player insisted on immediate full payment, but the casino scheduled the next withdrawal for the following week. We extended the complaint's timer by 7 days for the player's response, but due to a lack of response, we had to reject the complaint.

The player from Austria had reported a sudden negative balance and unprofitable purchased specials in an online casino. He had provided video evidence to support his claim. However, despite our team's attempts to engage and obtain more details about the issue, the player did not respond to our inquiries. As a result, we were unable to further investigate the matter and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Sweden had experienced significant delays during the multiple-step verification process required by the casino. The player had submitted all requested documents, however, the casino communications via email were slow and unclear resulting in a week of delays. The casino representative had assured that the player's verification was completed and her withdrawal request would be processed. However, the player reported that the transaction was not completed as promised. The player also expressed dissatisfaction with the casino's withdrawal policy, which limited payouts to twice a week with a maximum of 500 euros per transaction. Despite our efforts to assist and confirm if the player received her winnings, she did not provide a clear response, leading to the rejection of the complaint.

The player from Germany had reported a delayed withdrawal of €2100 from his verified Rollingslots 14 account, despite having made successful withdrawals in the past. He had been in contact with the KYC department and support daily, but had received no reasons for the delay, only being told the account was in verification mode. The casino later explained that the delay had been due to a need for additional verification documents, including information about a credit card used a few times in the past. The player subsequently received his full withdrawal amount in three installments of €700 each.

The player from Greece had faced issues verifying his Rolling Slots Casino account due to difficulties in providing an acceptable proof of residence. Despite having submitted his mobile phone bill and house contract, his documents were initially not accepted. However, after communicating with the Complaints Team, the casino had verified his account and he had received his payment. The complaint had been successfully resolved and was subsequently closed in the system.

The player from Sweden was struggling with the casino's verification process, despite having submitted all necessary documents and details. After waiting for five days without hearing back from the casino, the player grew increasingly frustrated. The player had attempted to submit the required documents multiple times, but the casino had rejected them each time. The casino had not responded to the player's inquiries about why the documents were not being accepted. We asked the player if he had provided any documents in English as the casino might have refused them otherwise, but the player did not respond to our messages and questions. Consequently, we were unable to investigate further and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Sweden was dealing with withdrawal issues as the casino allowed the use of VISA/MASTERCARD for deposits but not for withdrawals. The player's funds were stuck in the casino as the withdrawal method could not be changed unless it had been used for a deposit. The player was advised to use an alternative withdrawal method and made an additional deposit through Bitcoin. However, the withdrawal was still denied and he was asked to withdraw to a bank account. The casino offered to allow withdrawal through a crypto wallet, contingent on successful account verification. Unfortunately, due to the player's non-response to further queries, we were unable to continue the investigation and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Sweden deposited 250 euros into Rolling Slots online casino and then decided not to play due to negative reviews. When trying to withdraw the deposit, they were informed by the casino that they need to deposit at least 750 euros to make a withdrawal. The complaint was closed as the player stopped responding.

The player from Germany has been waiting for over two weeks for a withdrawal from an online casino. Despite daily communication, she keeps receiving the same response about consecutive payouts but the process hasn't started yet. We contacted the casino and found out that the casino processed several withdrawal to the player, though some were cancelled. As the money was return to the player's balance, she played it to zero, and then requested to close her casino account. We asked the player to confirm this, but she stopped respondig to our messages, so the complaint was finally rejected.

The player from Alberta had been suspended from his casino account without receiving any explanation. The player had started using the casino on July 25, 2023, and his account had been blocked three weeks before his complaint. He had played slots without any bonuses, except for free spins during gameplay. The casino had stated that the player's account was closed due to a violation of their Terms & Conditions related to chargeback/refund/recall procedures. Despite our attempts to communicate with the player for further clarification, we received no response, leading us to reject the complaint.

The player from Italy is having difficulty withdrawing money from the casino because the casino is requesting an excessive amount of documentation. Despite numerous submissions of the requested documents, the player keeps receiving notice of missing documentation. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from Germany requested a withdrawal more than a month ago. Unfortunately, he has not received his winnings yet. The player stopped responding to our questions, so we had to reject the complaint.

The player from Italy requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player's account got blocked due to failed verification. Although the casino behaved according to its T&C, the case was closed as unresolved because we were convinced that this case could have been handled better. The casino asked us to reopen this complaint. Consequently, we closed the case as resolved after the player informed us via email that the issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from British Columbia is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Greece has requested a withdrawal one week prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, winnings haven’t been received yet. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Canada is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings from the casino. The casino responded and explained that the player had now completed the verification and received their first payment. We asked the player for confirmation, but as they did not reply the complaint was rejected.

The player from Australia was experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to the limited availability of payment methods. Although the player stopped responding, the casino provided us with the information that the player was successfully verified, and a new withdrawal was completely processed via an alternative payment method. Therefore, we consider the complaint resolved.

The player from Germany has requested a withdrawal two days prior to submitting this complaint. Simply, winnings haven’t been received yet. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Germany is dissatisfied that the casino didn't set the requested limit, therefore, the player ended up losing all winnings. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Switzerland tried to withdraw his winnings, but the request was rejected due to technical issues. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Germany was unhappy with his winnings being split into several installments of €250. Even though we assumed that the issue has been resolved, without confirmation from the player, we were forced to reject this complaint.

The player from Finland is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his funds due to the limited availability of payment methods. The complaint was rejected because the player did not respond to our messages and questions.

The player's deposit was not refunded after his account got closed for having multiple accounts. The complaint was rejected as the player breached the casino terms therefore they had the right to void his balance.

The player from Germany has won a significant amount of money. The player would like to increase the limit, as with the current casino's withdrawal limit it would take too long to withdraw everything. Since the player stopped responding, her complaint was rejected.

The player from Italy faced difficulties withdrawing money due to issues with account authentication, which prevented the processing of the bank transfer. The player provided the necessary identity documents, bank statement, and proof of address to resolve the issue. The Complaints Team confirmed that the matter had been resolved and marked the complaint as 'resolved' in their system.

The player from Italy faced difficulties withdrawing funds, having submitted all required documents without receiving any response. He sought assistance in resolving this issue. The casino later confirmed that the player's account had been verified, and after further communication, all withdrawal requests were successfully processed. The player expressed gratitude for the support received, and the complaint was marked as resolved by the Complaints Team.

The player from Italy was unable to withdraw winnings after submitting the necessary verification documents and was not receiving a response. Additionally, there was an issue with an incorrect city listed in his profile that he had requested to correct. The issue was resolved as the player's account was verified, and the first portion of his winnings had been received. The remaining withdrawal requests were being processed, and the player confirmed that everything was now okay. The complaint was marked as 'resolved' in the system.

The player from Australia raised a concern regarding potential issues with recent withdrawal requests due to high amounts. The player experienced delays with multiple pending withdrawals but confirmed the successful receipt of some payments. After a period of communication and updates, all withdrawal issues were resolved, and the player confirmed that the matter could be closed.

The player from Austria had requested three withdrawals of 500€ each, of which two had been paid out. However, the remaining withdrawal had been delayed for two weeks. They had also wanted to withdraw an additional 2500€. The Complaints Team had facilitated communication with the casino, which confirmed that the delayed withdrawal had been processed successfully. The player had since received all pending payments and had requested further withdrawals, but had expressed dissatisfaction with the casino's customer service and account management. The complaint was marked as resolved, and the player was encouraged to reach out for future issues.

The player from Italy had his account at Tokyo Wild Casino blocked after he accidentally entered the wrong address and birthdate. Despite sending documents such as passport selfies and proof of residence, the casino did not update the details and blocked his account. He requested his balance and winnings. The issue was resolved when it was confirmed that the player received his payments, and the complaint was marked as 'resolved' in the system.

The player from Italy won 301 euros and requested a withdrawal after depositing 200 euros. They had provided all the requested documents, but the casino kept asking for a photo of a card with a name that wasn't printed on their Postepay Evolution card. Despite sending an online banking statement, support had only provided automated responses for 5 days. The Complaints Team assisted the player in getting their profile verified, and the withdrawal was eventually processed successfully. The complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from Italy had made a withdrawal request after a small win but hadn't received any money after a week, despite having completed verification procedures. He had also made unsuccessful attempts to contact the casino. We had advised the player to wait at least 14 days after requesting the withdrawal before submitting a complaint. However, the issue had been resolved shortly after the player contacted us, with the casino issuing the payment. We then marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Australia had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, her payout hadn't been received yet. After she submitted her complaint, the casino responded by stating that her withdrawal process had been completed and all payments had been successfully processed. The player confirmed receiving all her withdrawals. As a result, we marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Australia was facing issues in verifying his account at the Wild Tokyo casino. Even though he had provided the requested screenshots, they kept getting rejected. The player then received an update that his withdrawal request was being rejected, but later confirmed that it had been scheduled for a future date. After some time, the player confirmed the successful processing of his withdrawal. We marked the complaint as 'resolved' after the player confirmed receipt of his withdrawal.

The player from Italy had requested a withdrawal of 890 EURO from Wild Tokyo Casino. Despite having received a validation and verification email after submitting the required documents, the withdrawal hadn't been processed. He had contacted the casino several times but received no response. We had requested further details and set a timer for an additional 6 days for the casino to process the payment. The player later confirmed that he had received both payments. Consequently, we marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from Manitoba had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, her payout hadn't been received at that time. After she raised her concern with us, we had advised her to be patient and fully cooperate with the casino. She later confirmed that she had received a partial payment and her account had been verified. She confirmed later that all funds had been paid out. We marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Italy had experienced technical difficulties when uploading verification documents to an online casino. After winning 800 euros and requesting a withdrawal, the casino had requested account verification. However, the player had found the website interface non-responsive. The issue was eventually resolved after the player had been able to send the documentation and the casino had verified the account. Despite an initial concern about a violation of bonus rules, the casino decided to overlook the issue and had processed the player's withdrawal. The player had confirmed the receipt of all payments and expressed satisfaction with the casino's professionalism and the assistance provided by the Complaints Team.

The player from Italy had reported three deposits made through Sofort that were taken from his bank account but not credited to his casino gaming account. The online casino's support service had been unable to explain why. The player sought assistance in getting his funds returned. After reviewing the case, the casino had provided evidence that the deposits were indeed credited to the player's account and used for gaming activities. The player's account was closed at their own request due to concerns related to gambling addiction. Upon receiving the evidence, we informed the player, who then agreed to close the complaint. The issue was then resolved.

The player from Sweden had been attempting account verification since December 25th, but the casino consistently deemed the submitted documents, including a driver's license and a selfie with a passport, as inadequate. Despite numerous attempts, the player received the same response and could not get specific guidance on acceptable document submission. The player had submitted a variety of documents and formats, but the casino only approved some of them. Eventually, the casino approved the player's documents and verified the account. We marked the complaint as 'resolved' after the player confirmed the successful verification.

The player from Sweden had been trying to verify her account with Wild Tokyo Casino. Despite having submitted the necessary documents, she had received no feedback or confirmation of verification. The issue had been resolved and the player had confirmed the verification of the account was successful and later that the issue was solved. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Germany was experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. After providing the casino with the necessary documents, his casino account was fully verified. Then, he was able to request a withdrawal. The second payment was received approximately a week after the requests were made. The complaint is resolved.

The player from Italy had submitted all required documents on 10-25 before winning €500, but after requesting a withdrawal, the casino continued to ask for additional documents. The lengthy response times and repeated requests seemed like excuses to delay payment, and the player's withdrawal remained pending. The issue was resolved when the player received an instant transfer after the documents were finally approved, although the player expressed frustration over the delays and excessive verification checks. The complaint had been marked as 'resolved' in the system.

A player from Sweden had deposited around 1500 euros and won a total of 3800 euros. After receiving a partial payout of 1500 euros, his remaining 1574 euros had been stuck due to extreme withdrawal delays, with no response from Needforspin’s support. The casino had confirmed that the verification was complete and that withdrawals were scheduled for specific dates. The player later confirmed that the funds were received. The complaint has been marked as resolved.

The player from Italy had had issues with repeated demands for document resubmission from the casino despite having provided all requested papers. This had been preventing him from claiming his 1500 euros winnings. After communication with our team, the casino had finally verified his account and paid the first installment. However, the player had reported that his account was closed with some funds still in it. After further communication and clarification, the player had confirmed that all issues were resolved. We then marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Switzerland had been trying to claim winnings for over 10 days. Despite submitting numerous documents, the player had encountered difficulties due to a mismatched zip code in the account details. The casino had repeatedly requested the correct zip code, which was provided in the documents submitted by the player. After nearly two weeks, the casino had finally accepted the player's documents and the issue was resolved. The player had expressed dissatisfaction with the lengthy withdrawal process but requested the case to be closed. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Germany requested a €500 withdrawal from Needforspin and subsequently closed his account. Despite receiving notification that the withdrawal was being processed, the funds have not been received. The player later confirmed he recieved the money.

The player from Germany requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Malta has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.