Rajbet Casino Review

The player from India had deposited money into his casino account, but the amount was not credited to his Rajbet wallet after three days. The Complaints Team had advised him to contact his payment provider for further investigation, as the casino was limited in its ability to assist. Despite the team extending the complaint's timeframe and requesting updates, the player did not respond. The complaint was rejected due to a lack of communication and necessary information for further investigation.

The player from India had made three deposits to Rajbet, totaling INR 13,400, which were not credited to their account. Despite contacting support multiple times, the issue remained unresolved. We advised the player to contact their payment provider for investigation, as the casino's hands were tied in such cases. The complaint was rejected due to the player's lack of response.

The player from India had an issue where his deposit of 1000₹ had not been reflected in his online casino account. Despite multiple attempts to reach customer support, the issue had remained unresolved. We had suggested the player to contact his payment provider for further investigation as the casino might not have had the ability to resolve this issue. However, the issue was later resolved by the casino, and the player confirmed that the deposit had been successfully credited to his account. We had subsequently marked the complaint as resolved.

The player made deposit but it did not reflect in his account balance. Payment provider confirmed that the funds had been successfully transferred. The casino didn't respond and the player stopped responding so the complaint remained unresolved.

The player from India had wished to permanently close his account with the online casino. Despite having followed the self-exclusion process and contacting the casino, his account had remained open. After further communication guided by the Complaints Team, the player had successfully managed to get his account blocked. With the issue having been resolved, we had marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from India had had her account blocked. The user had been engaging in sports betting and had sought a refund of her deposit. However, the Complaints Team had clarified that they only handled issues related to online casinos, not sports betting. The complaint was eventually rejected due to the nature of the problem.

The player from India had utilized a no-deposit bonus, followed wagering terms and won 24,000 INR. His withdrawal request had been approved but was eventually cancelled due to a contravention of bonus terms and conditions. The player had argued that the casino's system had shown the withdrawal as approved, which caused confusion. The casino had claimed that the player was in a group with low gaming activity and had only accepted no-deposit bonuses, so the maximum withdrawal amount was reduced to 1,000 INR. The casino also explained that the approved status in the system meant that the amount had been successfully debited from the player's game account. After a discussion, the casino agreed to return the debited amount to the player and revise their terms and conditions to avoid future misunderstandings. The player's issue had been resolved, but he sought clarification on previous deductions. However, since these incidents occurred over a year ago, we were unable to investigate further.

The player successfully registered and made deposit via cryptocurrency. When it came to withdrawal request, they realized the option to withdraw via cryptocurrency had been disabled. When the player contacted support, it was confirmed that the withdrawal of the funds was only available via local payment methods for India, however, the player was a resident of a different country. According to the player, that was an intent violation because the casino was acceptting players from worldwide and was allowing them to deposit without any warning that only Indian residents were able to withdraw. The casino didn't react to the complaint, so the case remained unresolved.

The player from India had received a no deposit bonus and had won Rs 3000 after meeting wagering requirements. However, during withdrawal, the casino had deducted Rs 2750 from the player's account. The player had claimed this was a weekly bonus given by the casino based on VIP status. The player had previously made successful withdrawals and had completed KYC verification. We had explained that no deposit bonuses often came with a win limit, which in the case of Rajbet Casino, was set to 250 INR. We had requested additional information to support the player's case. However, the player did not respond to further communication, leading us to reject the complaint due to lack of evidence.

The player from India had encountered a problem with withdrawal after successfully getting his account verified at Rajbet. The player had claimed that the casino was blocking and rejecting his withdrawals without providing a reason. However, during the investigation, we had found evidence of the same user submitting multiple complaints from the same email address, each time referring to different casino accounts. The player had also denied knowing the other account when questioned. Due to these discrepancies and the player's failure to provide complete and truthful information, the complaint was rejected.

The player from India had his account at Rajbet banned without explanation and is unable to access his funds amounting to 3700000. Player's issue is sport betting related therefore we have rejected the complaint.

The player from India has been unable to withdraw his winnings of 167,000rs. After providing all required documents for verification, the casino requested bank statements for all withdrawal banks, including one that has been closed. The casino has now blocked his account, alleging the submission of fake documents. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from India is attempting to block his account with the casino, but the process is taking longer than desired, as the casino insists it will take 7 days. At last, the account was blocked, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from India tried to withdraw her funds, but after submitting the identity documents, her account was blocked without explanation. The player's account was blocked due to alleged breach of the Terms and Conditions regarding sports betting, so we rejected the complaint.

The player from India requested a withdrawal more than a month ago. Unfortunately, he has not received his winnings yet. The player stopped responding to our comments and questions, so we had to reject the complaint.

Players from Poland can deposit and play on the Rajbet casino website, but they are unable to withdraw their funds due to the lack of withdrawal methods available for European players. Despite mentioning crypto withdrawal methods on their website, there is no option for European players to withdraw their funds. After the casino decided to return not just deposits but the winnings as well, we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player's failed to close his account as the casino ignored his request. The complaint was resolved as the player's account got blocked even thou his deposits won't be refunded as he did not request for a self-exclusion.

The player from Croatia has deposited funds into his account. He's been promised a bonus that wasn't granted in the end. Now the player is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his deposited funds. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from Russia had his winnings canceled and the account blocked without any further explanation. The casino responded to say that the player didn't have an account in their system. This was proved to be incorrect. The casino then stated that the bonus used by the player had incorrect settings and so the winnings had been removed. The casino eventually offered a bonus as compensation which the player accepted, and so the complaint was closed as 'resolved'.