OnLuck Casino Review

The player from Australia had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting the complaint. Their money hadn't been received yet. The player reported that the casino had kept requesting new information and rejecting payments, despite the account being verified and all necessary details provided. After almost two weeks, the player confirmed receipt of all three payments. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Hesse submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Austria submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Denmark has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany had been waiting for his payout since February 11, 2024, and had received inconsistent updates on the status of the payout from the VIP support Manager. The player reported having faced delays and inconsistent communication from the casino's VIP manager. However, the issue was resolved when the player received his €1109 payout. Despite the resolution, the player had expressed dissatisfaction with the casino's communication practices. The Complaints Team had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Denmark is experiencing difficulties withdrawing funds, because the transactions to her preferred payment methods have been declined. The casino managed to process the withdrawal via bank transfer and the player confirmed he received it, therefore we marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from South Korea was experiencing difficulties withdrawing their winnings due to limited availability of payment methods. They wished to withdraw via Neteller, however, were asked to use an alternative payment method, which they refused. Later, the casino team informed us that a withdrawal via the player's preferred payment method would be possible after all. After amending a small issue in the settings of the player's gaming account, thanks to the player's cooperation, their withdrawal request was successfully processed. The player's complaint was closed as 'Resolved'.

The player from the Netherlands has experienced some issues with their balance. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Greece had won 48000 and the online casino had demanded verification. The player had complied with multiple requests for documents, but the casino consistently found issues, such as a proof of address document being more than 6 months old. The player felt that the casino was finding excuses to prevent the payout. We had asked the player to forward the last document sent to the casino. After the player had provided the necessary information, the issue was resolved the next day with the player's account being successfully verified.

The player from Greece had struggled with a delayed withdrawal from Infinity Casino after winning 500 euros. The player had been unable to access his winnings. Eventually, the player confirmed that he had received his winnings. Subsequently, we marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Greece had waited for 7 days for a withdrawal request and an explanation as to why his account, with a significant five-figure sum, had been closed 8 days prior. His inquiries had not been answered by the casino. The player had mainly played slot machines and placed sports bets. He had accumulated his winnings without an active bonus and his account had been verified. After 10 days, the casino had still not transferred his money. After 18 days, the casino informed him that his account had been closed due to a self-exclusion request because of gambling addiction. The casino had experienced a system malfunction which had allowed the player to continue depositing and playing. Upon realizing this, the casino had immediately closed the account and initiated a manual withdrawal process. After verifying the player's bank details, the casino had transferred the funds. The player had confirmed receiving his deposit, thus resolving the issue.

The player from Germany had deposited a large sum at Spinch and was contacted by a VIP Manager. After successful verification, she had requested a withdrawal which was not processed within the promised 48 hours. The player had been advised by the Complaints Team to wait at least 14 days after requesting the withdrawal before submitting a complaint. Despite initial concerns due to contradictory statements from the casino and negative online reviews, the player had received her winnings and expressed satisfaction with the process. The issue had been marked as 'resolved' by the Complaints Team.

The player from Bulgaria had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks and had not received his payout yet. The Complaints Team had advised him that such delays were often due to unfinished KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests, and suggested waiting at least 14 days after requesting a withdrawal before submitting a complaint. Following this advice, the player had confirmed that he received his withdrawal, and the case had been marked as resolved by the team.

The player from Malta requested a withdrawal of her winnings, however, her account was blocked, and her winnings were withheld. Even though the player has been self-excluded across all operator platforms, the casino paid out the player's deposits, so we considered this case resolved.