JustCasino.io Review

The player from the United Arab Emirates had been blocked from most casinos due to alleged anti-fraud measures and was unable to claim winnings. He had reported being banned from multiple online casinos affiliated with DamaN.V. and had received varied responses, with some casinos citing suspected fraud as the reason. We had asked the player to provide more details and to submit separate complaints for each casino. However, the player did not respond to our requests for additional information. As a result, we were unable to investigate the issue further and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Canada had wished to close his casino account, but the casino initially refused. Despite being offered numerous bonuses, he had insisted on closure. After some time the player managed to close his account.

The player from Norway had claimed that their Casino account was disabled immediately after they made a withdrawal request following their win on a slot game. Despite having provided various requested verification photos, the account had remained disabled for a week without any updates. The casino had responded by stating that they occasionally requested additional checks to ensure compliance with their terms and conditions. They confirmed that they had processed the player's winnings of 1400 EUR and decided not to reopen the player's account. The player later confirmed the receipt of their winnings, which led us to mark the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Switzerland had experienced delays on two withdrawal requests totaling 2,500 units, despite the maximum wait time of 24 hours. His account had also been blocked due to the payment delays. We had advised the player that withdrawal processing could take up to 14 days and urged him to be patient. Later, the player confirmed that his issue had been resolved. Therefore, we had marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Denmark had complained about a max cashout being imposed on his 1,050 euro winnings from his free spins bonus, which the casino had never mentioned. His winnings had been reduced to 300 euros and his cashout attempt had been stalled, with customer support unable to assist. After reviewing the casino's bonus terms and conditions, we found a clause stating that winnings from free spins were capped at 300 euros. The player confirmed that he had received the 300 euros after a second withdrawal request. Thus, we had concluded the case as resolved since the player had received the maximum allowed cashout as per the casino's terms and conditions.

The player from Australia had had an issue with an online casino where she had been trying to withdraw her winnings of $550. The casino had claimed she had a duplicate account, which she had denied. The player's account had not been initially verified, but after uploading several documents, the verification process had been completed. Subsequently, the player had been able to withdraw her funds. However, she had expressed dissatisfaction with the casino's decision to disallow her from receiving bonuses in the future. The complaint had been resolved successfully with the player receiving her winnings.

The player from Hesse has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. The player later informed us that he received his winnings and the complaint was closed as resolved.

The player from Quebec deposited $1000 and was supposed to withdraw $3800 after fulfilling the wagering requirements. The casino declined the withdrawal due to occasional bets over the max amount. The player did not contest this, but further stated that they had made an additional deposit that had not been credited to their account. The casino looked into the matter, then stated that there had indeed been an error and that the missing deposit had now been credited to the player's balance. The player confirmed this and the complaint was resolved.

The player from Australia deposited two separate transactions of $100 each, which were not registered. The funds have not been refunded and the account was subsequently closed. The player confirmed the funds were returned to him after he contacted his bank. We clsoed the complaint as resolved.

The player from Ireland faces withdrawal issues with the casino, as it is unable to withdraw to Skrill due to technical reasons. Additionally, their last deposit of 50 euros disappeared, and the support team has not resolved the problem. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.