22bet - fraude

This site disrespected my request for self-exclusion.

on november 3rd i requested self-exclusion, they said it was approved.

yesterday they let me deposit and spend over 5000€.

i talk to them and they make fun of me! They give different answers!

run away from this site!

i have printscreens of everything!

Hello,

this indeed sounds serious and if a casino explicitly ignores self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, it is not fair at all.

If you want to share details so we can all have a better understanding of what exactly has happened to you, please go ahead;

Perhaps take a look at how you made your request and under what circumstances the account was reopened—or was it even closed earlier? Did you register another account?

The more information you share, the better the context will be, but ultimately, it is your choice. No pressure.

Hi Radka,

I requested my self-exclusion as per the terms and conditions via live chat on November 3rd.

They replied saying it had been activated.

on november 25th the account was open and they allowed me to deposit and spend over 5000€.

i didn't open another account.

I contacted support. In the chat they said that during the self-exclusion period if I deposit the responsibility is mine!!!! In other words, for 22bet there is no effective self-exclusion!!!!

on the phone they are rude and say that the terms and conditions are to be interpreted differently.

it's unbelievable!

Hello, and thank you for the follow-up. So, basically, if the rules say you should use the chat feature for such a request (not a specific email for example) and it was confirmed by the chat operator as a carried-out request, the options for account reopening indeed seem odd—at best.

However, I'm curious how you learned that the account had been reopened. Did the casino send you an email, or were you simply able to log in?

In any case, if you requested self-exclusion due to gambling issues, the account should be closed permanently.

If you are willing to share, please tell me how you phrased the request. Did you specifically mention problem gambling?

When I think about it, that is the only thing that comes to mind. I may still consider an option for misunderstanding, but I'm not convinced that even in such cases, the account should be reopened instantly.

Would you be considering forming a complaint? We provide this feature to players to investigate whether such a sensitive issue was handled fairly on both sides. It is free, by the way.

Yes, I want to file a complaint. But 22bet doesn't appear in the complaints area.

I have all the prints I can share.

thank you.

Hello,

excellent call, I guess. Just use the option "the casino is not in the list," please. It is right under the search bar.

This casino has its own review, but you cannot see it because it lacks a Portuguese license; therefore, we are prohibited from showing it to players from your country. 🙁

Hi Radka,

there is no such option!

they say they have a license in Portugal!!!

Dear user, calm down and read, please. I imagine it is not easy to concentrate, but you need to focus so we can try to understand the matter.

This casino is not licensed in your country: https://casino.guru/22bet-Casino-review and I expect you can't see its review. But that is okay; don't worry about it, focus on explaining the event in the complaint, please.

I'll help you with details; just let me know, okay?

Thank you very much for your explanation Radka.

I have already managed to submit the complaint.

now i'm waiting for them to be quick as i've lost all my money.

this casino exploits addicts 😞

I'm so glad to hear the complaint is submitted.

I would just like to mention that the process will very likely not be that quick, and it involves a high level of cooperation from your side. Please have patience with my colleagues and the process; it may be demanding, especially in situations concerning problem gambling.

🙏

Therefore, if you have questions, don't hesitate to ask. I'll get back to you.

1 month after my complaint, I still have no answers.

the Casino guru is asking for things little by little, not all at once and setting the counter to zero. They always go until the end of time!

it's sad, there's no care for the addicted player!

they clearly want me to stop answering and not bother the 22bet that fills their pockets!

Please see my reply in the other thread you have posted.

They want to drown out my posts!

It's important to say it here!

Casino guru promotes illegal gambling that doesn't respect addiction

This is the second time that Veronika has missed the deadline after extending it!!!

look at my case it's atrocious incompetence!!!

this person can't be dealing with complaints !!!!

Casino guru continues to defend 22bet.

they still haven't closed my complaint after 2 months.

Now they're saying that I sent the self-exclusion request to several emails and that's why it wasn't done 😂

if I only sent it to one, they'd say it wasn't the right one...

UNBELIEVABLE!!!!

I filed a complaint against 22bet.

I asked for self-exclusion on 3/11 and they ignored it.

I deposited and spent over 5000€ afterwards.

I complained to Casino guru!

Casino guru says 22bet is right because instead of sending the request to just 1 email, I sent it to 3 emails 😂

one of those 3 emails was the right one to send it to!

do you think this is normal?

have you ever seen such a lame excuse?

someone has to do something, this is really making fun of us!

Hello,

this situation understandably raises strong emotions, but it is important to clarify how self-exclusion requests are evaluated in practice, especially for other players reading this.

A self-exclusion request must be clear, verifiable, and sent through a single, appropriate channel designated by the casino. Sending one message simultaneously to multiple addresses makes it impossible to reliably confirm when, where, and how the request was received and processed.

Because of this, such messages, unfortunately, cannot be treated as valid and enforceable self-exclusion requests. This is not about defending a casino, but about applying the same standard that must be used in every complaint so that decisions are consistent and evidence-based.

The first request that could be clearly identified, verified, and evaluated as a proper self-exclusion request was sent on 26/11, which is why the investigation proceeds from that date.

This does not mean that gambling addiction is being ignored or minimized. On the contrary, it shows why it is so important for players who struggle with gambling to follow a clear and documented process when requesting account closure. Otherwise, the request may not be enforceable later.

The complaint is still ongoing, and the remaining steps focus on what happened after the valid request date. Once the casino provides the required information, the case can move forward accordingly.

We all understand how distressing these situations can be, but spreading accusations does not help resolve the case or protect other players. Clear documentation and verifiable communication do.

It's a lie!!!!

the self-exclusion was clearly requested on 3/11!

take it out of the safe zone, it's to be seen by everyone!!!!

yet, since 26/11, thousands of euros have been spent! Where are they?

I understand that this situation is extremely frustrating.

However, the forum is not a place for issuing demands or for proving disputed facts while a complaint is still being reviewed. That process is ongoing and handled separately.

This section exists precisely because situations like this involve questions of responsibility, self-exclusion, and player protection, not because anyone is trying to hide anything. Keeping the discussion here helps other players understand how these situations are assessed in practice.

All relevant details regarding dates, deposits, and communication are being examined within the complaint itself. Posting repeated statements or instructions here will not speed that up or change the process.

Please allow the complaint to continue without further pressure on the forum. Any updates that matter will be reflected in the case outcome.