Thanks Jaro,
No, it is not about sports betting, it is about self exclusion and reopening of the account.
As I stated in the case, I played sports the same way and in the same style in all my time by the vendor.
The only difference is, in the first 6 months before self exclusion, I played both sports and casino.
After coming back from self exclusion I stopped playing the Casino, and played only sports. After trying the withdrawal I was flagged and blocked.
Conclusion:
- You can play Casino and sports as long as you keep losing and don't try more withdrawals than deposits
- If you don't play Casino for a while and try only sports we don't want you and we shall block you and take your funds.
This is the text book example of the predatory behavior, which is also ok, it is their right to let me play or not, but it is not within their rights to steal the remaining funds.
The casino themselves wrote I lost more money in Casino games then the sum of my deposits. And when that stopped, suddenly they have a problem with how I play sports (btw. I play it only way possible, use the odds they give, with the limits that they give, that's all).
That is why this is the casino case:
If the sportsbetting is the constant during my whole playing time, and the casino playing is the variable, then it is the casino matter, no matter what Suprabets try to sell to remove the subject to closed.
Edited by author 1 year ago
Automatic translation: