Execution Pokerstars. Apparently, payment is not voluntary (page 9)

Ind I'm just not there..

Basically the same with us, litigation funders no longer submit to executions and we should prepare for YEARS. It's about MrGreen.

That's why I'm surprised that they are now offering comparisons, even if the 50% level is cheeky and unacceptable (in my opinion).

he said he gets 50%...if they offer 80% and the PKF takes its share then it'll work out.

I think it also depends a lot on how much the litigation financier can earn from you, the higher the sum, the more they work on it.. every casino for me is under 15k

Has anyone successfully sued a Curacao casino? The legal situation is exactly the same, it's just that they're harder to grasp than Malta casinos.

Also consider suing the Curacaos.

A general question, do you continue to gamble on other sites or have you learned from them? 😅

Do you expect everyone to agree with this question or what? You often forget that lawyers read along here.

So I learned from it, turned my life inside out and you should do the same!

Get help if that's the case. It just destroys you, everyone knows that themselves!!!

Haven't played in years either. In hindsight, quitting wasn't hard either (for me).

Actually it can't be. I know someone else who is talking about 12K and he also got a comparison. I think it's time to wait for you...

Below is the info from my lawyer in Malta regarding execution against PS

The execution of the judgment related to your case is ongoing and in progress in the Maltese Courts. The Maltese court are the ones that determine the timing of the cases and adjournments hence we cannot provide any time forecasts.

It will be a long journey, comrades!

I think the important thing in your case is that they were able to deposit the money in court. That's what my lawyer told me in my case. (garnish order)

If you go bankrupt, the money is still there.

No, I don't expect it, I don't gamble anymore either, and apart from that, from a purely legal point of view, it sucks, no matter how often you lose and complain. And the lawyer won't care what you're doing, in the end they only want to make money from you anyway.

Wait anyway, was he offered the comparison this year as well? That would be a good drawing then something happens.

I think that a "group" like PS will not go bankrupt that quickly. At least I hope so.😉

that has nothing to do with height, the judgments must be included in the balance sheet. Or, if necessary, make provisions on the balance sheet if there are unclear disputes beyond the financial year, if the judgments required are sooo high, it could be that certain OC providers would become insolvent.

Do you really believe? I only say bet.at. ho..

It's faster than you think.

Yesterday!

Correct. Even the supreme court in Austria has stated that a repayment also takes place if the player only pays in with the intention that he will sue for the money back in the event of a loss.

Ultimately, this means: In Austria you can deposit at any MGA casino, hope for winnings and if it doesn't work, then simply ask for the money back.

Ultimately, it is the casino's responsibility to no longer allow Austrian players. There is simply no legal contract, no matter how the casino argues. The casinos are aware of the legal situation, but many still allow Austrian players out of sheer greed for money.

I mean, what are the casinos still referring to? All legal instances have already been through and the ECJ has clearly stated that gambling is a matter for the individual countries. So the casinos also violate EU law and you should really think about why the Maltese government and the MGA are not even being punished for it?

The MGA is an EU license and accordingly the MGA must comply with EU laws and if casinos consistently violate these laws then a license revocation must be the consequence.

Any verification craze is justified with alleged money laundering laws where you then have to send in all sorts of sensitive data, but when casinos offer illegal gambling in some countries they look the other way and suddenly EU laws no longer apply.

Something urgently needs to change here and the many lawyers should also consider doing something in this direction. This would put the casinos under pressure and they would finally settle all the claims if they were otherwise threatened with a complete license withdrawal.

You are absolutely right!

But I haven't looked through it for a long time because I don't understand at all how it can be possible that they can avoid paying for so long! Normally, the accounts would have to be seized and that's it. And Malta earns a lot from gambling, which means that the online casinos don't want anything bad.