I've been looking for that in vain... but if Malta has answered the EU Commission's questions, they don't seem to have been very good.
I strongly believe that the response to the EU Commission today influenced the final submissions.
Artificial intelligence predicts that those whose convictions became final before the controversial law was passed in Malta have a significantly higher chance of getting their money back. Such a law cannot be applied retroactively. That's what the artificial intelligence says. What do you think?
Would that mean that judgments from Austria from years such as 2021 and 2022 must be enforced?
Judgments until June 2023.
Yes, exactly, until the law is passed.
But the reason for the non-enforcement is the same for all of them 😅 public ordre is written in all judgments
Isn't "public policy" an integral part of Bill 55? If we theoretically assume there's only a single claim (which is theoretically possible), how can it be "public policy"? So "public policy" doesn't exist in the context of casinos before Bill 55. That's just my opinion. I don't know, maybe it isn't.
According to the preliminary rulings on the ecourt Malta website, yes.
This is what it says in every decide
I have five lawsuits in total. Now a major provider has offered 37.5%, and my lawyer says I should accept it because I'm afraid of liquidation.
I think most people know which provider it is. If the others do the same, you'll only get a small portion back in the end, considering that the litigation funder takes 39%. You could have sold it directly to Rightnow.
Hope this doesn't happen to the others.
Yes, things are going to be bad for us... as I suspected... they had YEARS!!! to prepare.
I was hoping for a 75% comparison... but if you write 37.5%, that's really cheeky....
I said goodbye to my money when I deposited it at the casino. If the casino goes into liquidation and I don't get a cent, it doesn't matter, but I won't agree to any settlement.☝️
Are you talking about MrGreen? Feel free to say "e." I wouldn't assume that under any circumstances. Do you already have an execution pending, or did you just recently file a lawsuit?
Mr. Green? How do they explain that they've had consistently strong balance sheets in recent years? They can't simply go bankrupt that easily, since they belong to 888 Ltd.
Which provider are you talking about?
It's about Bet365. Litigation funders are having a really tough time right now, so I don't know if they're just acting in the interest of the litigation funders to avoid losing them for future work.
Since my sports betting losses were financed by poker winnings anyway, it wouldn't hurt so much to accept the deal. I have until Monday to decide.
I think this is a disgrace at Bet 365; they're not that small either. What does your lawyer say about this? Does he have any information?
I work at a law firm near Munich.
Here is a small excerpt.
Although we generally strive to obtain a higher compensation amount, we believe it makes sense for you to accept the offer in this case. This is due to the following reasons:
1. We are aware that Hillside is planning to restructure its companies, which could increase the risk of enforcement.
2. Hillside has received a new license in Germany under a new legal entity, sparking rumors of possible liquidation proceedings.
- (From me) Personally, I find that simply cheeky. It always reminds me of those construction companies that close down every few years and reopen under a different name to avoid paying the delayed lawsuits. Something really needs to change in Germany (Europe).
3. We consider it highly likely that Hillside plans to liquidate the "old" ENCs, which could raise legitimate concerns among the claimants.
4. We have determined that some claims against Hillside are at least partially at risk because losses were incurred while bet365 was still operated by one of the Gibraltar LPs (before November 2018). The prospects of success in these cases in court, particularly with regard to a full refund, are therefore reduced and subject to increased risk.
Should a liquidation be likely, the liquidation proceeds will likely be far less than the stated 37.5%. Furthermore, the question arises as to whether any amounts will be available from the other party at all. Against this backdrop, we advise you to accept the settlement. The litigation funder financing your legal dispute also wishes to accept the settlement promptly and has asked us to request approval on their behalf as well.
Extremely funny and actually so cheeky.
difficult
That means the amount was already claimed in 2018 and you played before that?
Well, basically, only you can decide.
I played with Bet365 from 2016 to 2022 and changed companies once in 2018.
This means that if it is not liquid, I can forget about the losses until 2018.
I'll probably reject it anyway, as I'd already written off the money in 2022. At 50%, things would probably look different.
Okay, yes, the case is a little more complex, but you can see again how these criminals act and have been doing so for decades.
Free professional educational courses for online casino employees aimed at industry best practices, improving player experience, and fair approach to gambling.
An initiative we launched with the goal to create a global self-exclusion system, which will allow vulnerable players to block their access to all online gambling opportunities.
You will soon be redirected to the casino’s website. Please wait. If you use some ad blocking software, please check its settings.
