Hello,
I think the main point we may be missing is that the complaint was not reviewed solely from the perspective of whether the outcome feels fair to the player.
At Casino Guru, complaints are reviewed in the context of the casino's terms and conditions and whether those terms were applied fairly, consistently, and in a way that can reasonably be supported by the facts of the case.
In your case, the investigation found evidence that the same individual attempted to complete verification on more than one account. Together with the other circumstances surrounding the accounts, this created a situation that casinos commonly consider a breach of their rules.
I understand that you continue to focus on the financial outcome and the amount retained by the casino. However, the complaint team had to assess whether the casino's interpretation and application of its rules could be reasonably challenged based on the available evidence.
After reviewing the case, the conclusion was that the casino had sufficient grounds to apply its terms in this situation. The fact that there may not have been any malicious intent does not automatically mean that no rule was breached, nor does it automatically make the casino's application of those rules unfair.
For that reason, the complaint team did not find sufficient grounds to dispute the casino's decision in this particular case.



