I imagine why so many players believe that once the casino is not willing to show the proofs of the other accounts, the matter is clear as a sky for them.
Yet, I'd like to say that once the responsible features and addictions play a part in the story, it is always wise to wait for the complaint to reach conclusion.
For example, Veronika went through your evidence and concluded that "You did not mention gambling addiction as the reason for your self-exclusion request back in 2021" which may explain why the casino did not close your account permanently and instead offered temporary account closure.
As I'm sure you know, the only real exclusion comes up with the proper reason provided to the casino - the addiction.
So, I think it's fair to say that we accept your opinions and the rest will be specified once the complaint progresses. Sounds quite fair, I'd say.
Automatic translation: