Dear Jesst,
Thank you for your cooperation and for providing additional details regarding your case.
At this moment, the only evidence we have confirms that you sent an initial self-exclusion request by email on 7 May. However, since the casino did not respond to this email, we cannot confirm with certainty that the casino received or processed this request at that time.
Regarding the live chat conversations, we understand your point that the casino may have access to these records. However, we cannot require the casino to provide chat logs that are not available to us, and the casino is not necessarily obligated to archive all live chat conversations. If the casino states that such records are unavailable, we have no independent evidence that would allow us to prove otherwise. This is why it is important for players to keep their own records of important communications, especially in responsible gambling-related matters.
Based on the evidence available to us, the first confirmed communication where the casino was informed about your gambling problem and requested self-exclusion was your email from 15 May. The casino then confirmed the account closure on 16 May.
Please note that self-exclusion requests are usually handled manually by the responsible departments, as they require time to be reviewed and processed properly. From our perspective, the casino acted within a reasonable timeframe by restricting your account shortly after receiving the confirmed request.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, we cannot conclude that the casino failed to act after being properly informed about your gambling problem, and we are unable to hold the casino responsible for the deposits made during the period when the request was being processed.
For these reasons, we have to reject this complaint. Thank you for your understanding. I am genuinely sorry that we were not able to assist you more effectively in this particular situation, as we always aim to help players resolve their issues whenever possible.
Please remember that you are welcome to contact us again if you run into any problems with this or any other casino in the future. Whether it is a question, a concern, or a new issue that needs to be looked into, our team is here and ready to support you.
Best regards
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Dear Jesst,
Thank you for your cooperation and for providing additional details regarding your case.
At this moment, the only evidence we have confirms that you sent an initial self-exclusion request by email on 7 May. However, since the casino did not respond to this email, we cannot confirm with certainty that the casino received or processed this request at that time.
Regarding the live chat conversations, we understand your point that the casino may have access to these records. However, we cannot require the casino to provide chat logs that are not available to us, and the casino is not necessarily obligated to archive all live chat conversations. If the casino states that such records are unavailable, we have no independent evidence that would allow us to prove otherwise. This is why it is important for players to keep their own records of important communications, especially in responsible gambling-related matters.
Based on the evidence available to us, the first confirmed communication where the casino was informed about your gambling problem and requested self-exclusion was your email from 15 May. The casino then confirmed the account closure on 16 May.
Please note that self-exclusion requests are usually handled manually by the responsible departments, as they require time to be reviewed and processed properly. From our perspective, the casino acted within a reasonable timeframe by restricting your account shortly after receiving the confirmed request.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, we cannot conclude that the casino failed to act after being properly informed about your gambling problem, and we are unable to hold the casino responsible for the deposits made during the period when the request was being processed.
For these reasons, we have to reject this complaint. Thank you for your understanding. I am genuinely sorry that we were not able to assist you more effectively in this particular situation, as we always aim to help players resolve their issues whenever possible.
Please remember that you are welcome to contact us again if you run into any problems with this or any other casino in the future. Whether it is a question, a concern, or a new issue that needs to be looked into, our team is here and ready to support you.
Best regards
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
