Dear Casino Guru Team,
Thank you for the casino’s response.
However, I would like to provide a full and accurate timeline of events, which clearly demonstrates inconsistencies in the casino’s explanation and a failure to properly apply responsible gambling measures.
On February 1, 2026, I informed the casino that I am suffering from gambling addiction and requested account closure. My account was closed immediately.
On February 12, 2026, my account was reopened via customer support, despite the casino already being aware of my gambling addiction.
On February 18, 2026, I again clearly stated that I am suffering from gambling addiction and requested account closure.
Despite this, my account remained active until February 27, 2026, during which I was able to continue depositing and gambling, resulting in significant losses.
The casino claims that a manager was required to process the closure and that the delay occurred due to the manager being unavailable. However, this is inconsistent with their own actions, as customer support had already demonstrated the ability to both close and reopen my account.
Furthermore, on March 16, 2026, I received communication indicating that the casino was still prepared to reopen my account, despite my prior declarations of gambling addiction.
These facts clearly demonstrate that:
The casino had the technical ability to act immediately.
The delay of 9 days in closing my account cannot be justified.
My account was reopened after a self-exclusion request related to gambling addiction.
I was allowed to continue gambling while in a clearly vulnerable state.
I would also like to confirm that I have full supporting evidence for all of the above, including email correspondence, chat communication, and transaction records, all of which can be provided upon request.
Once a player explicitly declares gambling addiction, responsible gambling procedures should require immediate and irreversible action to prevent further harm. Allowing continued access and reopening the account under such circumstances represents a serious failure in duty of care and responsible gambling obligations.
Kind regards,
Aivis
Dear Casino Guru Team,
Thank you for the casino’s response.
However, I would like to provide a full and accurate timeline of events, which clearly demonstrates inconsistencies in the casino’s explanation and a failure to properly apply responsible gambling measures.
On February 1, 2026, I informed the casino that I am suffering from gambling addiction and requested account closure. My account was closed immediately.
On February 12, 2026, my account was reopened via customer support, despite the casino already being aware of my gambling addiction.
On February 18, 2026, I again clearly stated that I am suffering from gambling addiction and requested account closure.
Despite this, my account remained active until February 27, 2026, during which I was able to continue depositing and gambling, resulting in significant losses.
The casino claims that a manager was required to process the closure and that the delay occurred due to the manager being unavailable. However, this is inconsistent with their own actions, as customer support had already demonstrated the ability to both close and reopen my account.
Furthermore, on March 16, 2026, I received communication indicating that the casino was still prepared to reopen my account, despite my prior declarations of gambling addiction.
These facts clearly demonstrate that:
The casino had the technical ability to act immediately.
The delay of 9 days in closing my account cannot be justified.
My account was reopened after a self-exclusion request related to gambling addiction.
I was allowed to continue gambling while in a clearly vulnerable state.
I would also like to confirm that I have full supporting evidence for all of the above, including email correspondence, chat communication, and transaction records, all of which can be provided upon request.
Once a player explicitly declares gambling addiction, responsible gambling procedures should require immediate and irreversible action to prevent further harm. Allowing continued access and reopening the account under such circumstances represents a serious failure in duty of care and responsible gambling obligations.
Kind regards,
Aivis