Thank you, dear Bagger, for the last e-mail, it is exactly what I needed. Since I am not a lawyer, I will not comment on your legal options and VIP agents calling you in person.
I can only comment on the fact that getting self-exclused in one casino, does not get you automatically excluded in other casinos owned or operated by the same entity. This is, unfortunately, an industry standard and unles terms & conditions or responsible gambling page explicitly states that self-exlusion is owner/operator-wide, you have to treat the casino as a singular entity and self-exclude from each one separately. No court of law would dispute that.
However, getting contacted by another casino as soon as your self-exclusion in another one is confirmed, is not in line with our player protection rules and I have added notes for future reference, regarding this incident.
I would like to ask whether you have sent more e-mail asking for self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, or whether you have inquired with the support (via email or live chat) about the status of your request from 11/05/2025.
Last but not least, I apologise if my previous request was not worded well, but the e-mail you have sent me has been forwarded, while I need the conversation as an attachment. It means You need to create new e-mail, address it to myself and then add the coversation from 11/05/2025 to this new message as an attachment. I need the original file so I can upload it alongside the other evidence.
Thank you, dear Bagger, for the last e-mail, it is exactly what I needed. Since I am not a lawyer, I will not comment on your legal options and VIP agents calling you in person.
I can only comment on the fact that getting self-exclused in one casino, does not get you automatically excluded in other casinos owned or operated by the same entity. This is, unfortunately, an industry standard and unles terms & conditions or responsible gambling page explicitly states that self-exlusion is owner/operator-wide, you have to treat the casino as a singular entity and self-exclude from each one separately. No court of law would dispute that.
However, getting contacted by another casino as soon as your self-exclusion in another one is confirmed, is not in line with our player protection rules and I have added notes for future reference, regarding this incident.
I would like to ask whether you have sent more e-mail asking for self-exclusion due to gambling addiction, or whether you have inquired with the support (via email or live chat) about the status of your request from 11/05/2025.
Last but not least, I apologise if my previous request was not worded well, but the e-mail you have sent me has been forwarded, while I need the conversation as an attachment. It means You need to create new e-mail, address it to myself and then add the coversation from 11/05/2025 to this new message as an attachment. I need the original file so I can upload it alongside the other evidence.