Hi yrdujvggdhg,
Thank you for your response and for sharing your perspective on the situation.
However, it’s important to clarify a crucial point:
If a player wishes to use a payment method that does not belong to them (such as a relative’s card), they must request and receive approval from the casino before making any deposit. This is standard practice to prevent fraud, ensure compliance with anti-money laundering regulations, and protect all parties involved.
Asking to verify the card only after the deposits have been made is not sufficient, and unfortunately, cannot retroactively authorize the use of a third-party payment method.
The fact that the casino later sent you an authorization form does not change the fact that the deposits were already made in violation of the terms and conditions — specifically the rule prohibiting the use of unauthorized third-party payment methods.
In such cases, the casino is within its rights to restrict the account and void winnings, as outlined in their terms of service.
We understand this may feel unfair, especially after a winning session, but the responsibility to ensure compliance with payment rules lies with the account holder before any funds are deposited.
Please let me know if there's any information I've missed, but unfortunately, I will have to reject your complaint as unjustified. I truly wish I could offer more assistance. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to your reply.
Hi yrdujvggdhg,
Thank you for your response and for sharing your perspective on the situation.
However, it’s important to clarify a crucial point:
If a player wishes to use a payment method that does not belong to them (such as a relative’s card), they must request and receive approval from the casino before making any deposit. This is standard practice to prevent fraud, ensure compliance with anti-money laundering regulations, and protect all parties involved.
Asking to verify the card only after the deposits have been made is not sufficient, and unfortunately, cannot retroactively authorize the use of a third-party payment method.
The fact that the casino later sent you an authorization form does not change the fact that the deposits were already made in violation of the terms and conditions — specifically the rule prohibiting the use of unauthorized third-party payment methods.
In such cases, the casino is within its rights to restrict the account and void winnings, as outlined in their terms of service.
We understand this may feel unfair, especially after a winning session, but the responsibility to ensure compliance with payment rules lies with the account holder before any funds are deposited.
Please let me know if there's any information I've missed, but unfortunately, I will have to reject your complaint as unjustified. I truly wish I could offer more assistance. Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to your reply.