The player from the United Kingdom had requested a restricted account to adhere to safer gambling guidelines after winning a substantial amount of money. He claimed that despite sending an email to restrict his account, the casino stated they had not received it, which had allowed him to continue gambling and subsequently lose money. He also faced issues with pending withdrawals not being actioned and questioned the casino's adherence to responsible gambling practices. We reviewed the communication timeline and determined that the casino had not had sufficient time to process the responsible gambling request or to protect him from further play. Consequently, the complaint was rejected as the self-exclusion process could take longer than a day, and the casino's responsibility to protect the player was not established in this case. Later, after reopening the complaint, the player managed to get his account closed but still sought the return of funds deposited after his restriction request. Despite efforts to contact the casino, no cooperation was received, and as the casino operated without a valid license and no alternative dispute resolution was available, the complaint was ultimately closed as unresolved.

