Dear pipiag680
Thank you for your messages and for sharing the details of your experience. I understand that this situation has been frustrating for you, and I appreciate the time you took to provide screenshots and explanations.
After carefully reviewing the information you provided, we are unfortunately unable to assist with a refund of your losses. The main reason is that, in your communications with Spinch Casino, the request to self-exclude did not explicitly mention gambling addiction or gambling-related problems at the time of the request.
To clarify: casinos are required to act on explicit self-exclusion requests that clearly indicate gambling-related problems. General account closure requests or expressions of wanting to stop playing without explicitly stating gambling problems do not meet the criteria for responsible gaming interventions that would justify a refund of losses. While your account was eventually closed, the closure itself cannot retroactively justify reimbursing losses incurred prior to the formal self-exclusion request.
I have read all your emails and reviewed the screenshots, but I needed to verify with you that the casino actually closed your account. This step ensures that we have a complete and accurate understanding of the situation before assessing the complaint.
Finally, in response to your question about the guidance I provided: the instructions I shared are a practical template to help players clearly communicate a self-exclusion request due to gambling-related problems. Casinos may not always publish detailed rules on exactly how to phrase such a request, so this guidance ensures your request is understood and processed correctly, helping prevent misunderstandings in the future.
I hope this explanation helps clarify our position and the steps we take to assist players.
Best regards,
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.

Dear pipiag680
Thank you for your messages and for sharing the details of your experience. I understand that this situation has been frustrating for you, and I appreciate the time you took to provide screenshots and explanations.
After carefully reviewing the information you provided, we are unfortunately unable to assist with a refund of your losses. The main reason is that, in your communications with Spinch Casino, the request to self-exclude did not explicitly mention gambling addiction or gambling-related problems at the time of the request.
To clarify: casinos are required to act on explicit self-exclusion requests that clearly indicate gambling-related problems. General account closure requests or expressions of wanting to stop playing without explicitly stating gambling problems do not meet the criteria for responsible gaming interventions that would justify a refund of losses. While your account was eventually closed, the closure itself cannot retroactively justify reimbursing losses incurred prior to the formal self-exclusion request.
I have read all your emails and reviewed the screenshots, but I needed to verify with you that the casino actually closed your account. This step ensures that we have a complete and accurate understanding of the situation before assessing the complaint.
Finally, in response to your question about the guidance I provided: the instructions I shared are a practical template to help players clearly communicate a self-exclusion request due to gambling-related problems. Casinos may not always publish detailed rules on exactly how to phrase such a request, so this guidance ensures your request is understood and processed correctly, helping prevent misunderstandings in the future.
I hope this explanation helps clarify our position and the steps we take to assist players.
Best regards,
Veronika
As part of our Global Self-Exclusion Initiative, we've partnered with BetBlocker, a UK-registered charity providing a free service to support people worldwide. You can find more information about our initiative here (https://casino.guru/global-self-exclusion-initiative) and about BetBlocker here (https://betblocker.org/).
BetBlocker, which supports seven languages, is quick and easy to install on multiple devices, taking just 2 minutes. Once installed, it blocks access to over 84,230 gambling websites and runs quietly in the background. The service can be used anonymously and helps individuals manage their access to gambling safely and appropriately, whether that means complete restriction or limiting access during vulnerable periods.
Additionally, BetBlocker includes a list of 824 gambling information sites. These sites primarily inform users about and advertise gambling services. You can choose to include these sites in your restriction by ticking a box. However, if you have an ongoing complaint against a gambling operator, do not check this box, as it will prevent you from accessing the Casino.Guru website as well.
