Dear Casino Guru Team,
I would like to respectfully submit a further statement in response to Slotuna’s position and clarify several crucial points.
First of all, I would like to highlight that in previous similar cases, players in my exact situation have had their winnings paid out after fair assessment, once they demonstrated full cooperation and honest intent. While I understand that each case is unique, I believe it is only fair to take into consideration the principle of equal treatment and past precedents where winnings were paid under similar conditions.
Secondly, I am currently a fully verified VIP player at Frumzi Casino, which belongs to the same group. They have successfully verified my identity, accepted my documents, and consistently paid my winnings without issue. This clearly proves my intent was never malicious or deceitful, and that my identification is genuine and trustworthy.
Furthermore, while Slotuna refers to a specific clause to justify withholding the winnings, I would like to point out that I never acted with bad faith. I immediately informed them of my real name, correct date of birth, updated address, and full explanation regarding the use of my wife’s card. I submitted every single document they requested — multiple times — and I cooperated fully throughout the entire KYC process. Nothing was hidden. Nothing was done with bad intent.
So I respectfully ask:
If I had any dishonest intentions, would I go through such a transparent and complete verification process? Would I voluntarily disclose everything?
How can I trust any online casino after such an experience?
How could Slotuna accept deposits from my wife’s card without issue, but later use that same detail as a reason to withhold €8,941 in winnings?
Why was a small win of €50 considered valid and paid out — but a larger win suddenly invalid?
Such behavior clearly shows inconsistency and, legally speaking, constitutes discriminatory treatment and significant financial harm. If there is one rule for small wins and another for large ones, this opens the door to potential regulatory violations and legal action.
Please be informed that I intend to pursue this matter in full through all appropriate regulatory and legal channels. I will act within the law and remain respectful at all times — but I will not stop until this situation is reviewed fairly and the amount that rightfully belongs to me is returned.
Thank you for your attention and continued support.
Kind regards,
Al******* G.
Dear Casino Guru Team,
I would like to respectfully submit a further statement in response to Slotuna’s position and clarify several crucial points.
First of all, I would like to highlight that in previous similar cases, players in my exact situation have had their winnings paid out after fair assessment, once they demonstrated full cooperation and honest intent. While I understand that each case is unique, I believe it is only fair to take into consideration the principle of equal treatment and past precedents where winnings were paid under similar conditions.
Secondly, I am currently a fully verified VIP player at Frumzi Casino, which belongs to the same group. They have successfully verified my identity, accepted my documents, and consistently paid my winnings without issue. This clearly proves my intent was never malicious or deceitful, and that my identification is genuine and trustworthy.
Furthermore, while Slotuna refers to a specific clause to justify withholding the winnings, I would like to point out that I never acted with bad faith. I immediately informed them of my real name, correct date of birth, updated address, and full explanation regarding the use of my wife’s card. I submitted every single document they requested — multiple times — and I cooperated fully throughout the entire KYC process. Nothing was hidden. Nothing was done with bad intent.
So I respectfully ask:
If I had any dishonest intentions, would I go through such a transparent and complete verification process? Would I voluntarily disclose everything?
How can I trust any online casino after such an experience?
How could Slotuna accept deposits from my wife’s card without issue, but later use that same detail as a reason to withhold €8,941 in winnings?
Why was a small win of €50 considered valid and paid out — but a larger win suddenly invalid?
Such behavior clearly shows inconsistency and, legally speaking, constitutes discriminatory treatment and significant financial harm. If there is one rule for small wins and another for large ones, this opens the door to potential regulatory violations and legal action.
Please be informed that I intend to pursue this matter in full through all appropriate regulatory and legal channels. I will act within the law and remain respectful at all times — but I will not stop until this situation is reviewed fairly and the amount that rightfully belongs to me is returned.
Thank you for your attention and continued support.
Kind regards,
Al******* G.