Hello everyone,
thank you both for your cooperation and for providing all additional information and supporting evidence.
Dear Bagnollo74,
thank you for providing the bank confirmation letter and for your detailed explanation. I have carefully reviewed all information submitted by both parties, including the full communication timeline provided by Rolling Slots Casino as well as the supporting screenshots and documentation.
At this stage, I would like to clearly address the key point of this case – the verification process and the IBAN documentation.
Based on the evidence provided by the casino, the verification timeline is as follows:
- On 04.03, the casino sent a request for additional KYC documents, including verification of the payment method (IBAN and card used for deposits).
- On 09.04, the casino sent a reminder and extended the verification period.
- On 15.05, the account was closed and the remaining balance was confiscated due to the absence of a response from the player.
The documentation provided by the casino appears consistent, time-stamped, and shows that the player did not respond within the extended verification timeframe.
Regarding the IBAN issue, I also acknowledge the bank confirmation you have provided stating that the IBAN was officially deactivated on 15.04.2026. However, this date confirms that the IBAN was still active during both the initial verification request (04.03) and the reminder period (09.04), which means there was sufficient time to inform the casino of any issues or provide alternative proof while the verification process was still open.
Importantly, the casino has demonstrated that multiple attempts were made to contact you and allow sufficient time for compliance, including an extended deadline beyond the standard verification period. No response or alternative communication was made during this time window.
While I understand your frustration and your willingness to cooperate now, verification procedures are a mandatory requirement before withdrawal processing, and failure to respond within the given timeframe typically results in account closure according to standard casino Terms and Conditions.
After reviewing all available evidence, I have not found sufficient grounds to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or outside of its stated rules and procedures.
Therefore, I must conclude that the casino’s actions were justified and in accordance with their Terms and Conditions, and I am unable to support the claim for reinstatement of the confiscated balance.
For these reasons, this complaint will be closed as Rejected – failure to complete KYC verification within the required timeframe.
I would also like to emphasize that in this case the casino provided clear communication attempts, extended the verification period, and allowed significantly more time than the standard process would require.
Dear Rolling Slots Casino,
thank you for your cooperation and for providing the supporting evidence via email. It was essential for the assessment of this case.
Samuel,
Casino Guru
Hello everyone,
thank you both for your cooperation and for providing all additional information and supporting evidence.
Dear Bagnollo74,
thank you for providing the bank confirmation letter and for your detailed explanation. I have carefully reviewed all information submitted by both parties, including the full communication timeline provided by Rolling Slots Casino as well as the supporting screenshots and documentation.
At this stage, I would like to clearly address the key point of this case – the verification process and the IBAN documentation.
Based on the evidence provided by the casino, the verification timeline is as follows:
- On 04.03, the casino sent a request for additional KYC documents, including verification of the payment method (IBAN and card used for deposits).
- On 09.04, the casino sent a reminder and extended the verification period.
- On 15.05, the account was closed and the remaining balance was confiscated due to the absence of a response from the player.
The documentation provided by the casino appears consistent, time-stamped, and shows that the player did not respond within the extended verification timeframe.
Regarding the IBAN issue, I also acknowledge the bank confirmation you have provided stating that the IBAN was officially deactivated on 15.04.2026. However, this date confirms that the IBAN was still active during both the initial verification request (04.03) and the reminder period (09.04), which means there was sufficient time to inform the casino of any issues or provide alternative proof while the verification process was still open.
Importantly, the casino has demonstrated that multiple attempts were made to contact you and allow sufficient time for compliance, including an extended deadline beyond the standard verification period. No response or alternative communication was made during this time window.
While I understand your frustration and your willingness to cooperate now, verification procedures are a mandatory requirement before withdrawal processing, and failure to respond within the given timeframe typically results in account closure according to standard casino Terms and Conditions.
After reviewing all available evidence, I have not found sufficient grounds to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or outside of its stated rules and procedures.
Therefore, I must conclude that the casino’s actions were justified and in accordance with their Terms and Conditions, and I am unable to support the claim for reinstatement of the confiscated balance.
For these reasons, this complaint will be closed as Rejected – failure to complete KYC verification within the required timeframe.
I would also like to emphasize that in this case the casino provided clear communication attempts, extended the verification period, and allowed significantly more time than the standard process would require.
Dear Rolling Slots Casino,
thank you for your cooperation and for providing the supporting evidence via email. It was essential for the assessment of this case.
Samuel,
Casino Guru