On 18 May 2026, I requested the closure of my Robocat account.
On the same day, the casino support team confirmed by email that my account had been successfully closed.
However, after receiving this confirmation, I discovered that my account was still fully accessible. I was able to log in, deposit money and continue playing.
On 20 May 2026, after realizing that the account was still active and after returning to the platform, I sent another email asking the casino not to proceed with the closure.
On 24 May 2026, I sent a new request asking for my account to be closed.
Robocat later informed me that my account had actually been closed on 24 May 2026.
The main issue is that the casino confirmed on 18 May that my account had been closed, while the account remained accessible until 24 May.
During this period, I continued gambling and incurred losses totaling approximately €951.
I requested a refund because these losses occurred during a period in which I had already been informed that my account had been closed.
The casino refused my request by referring to section 6.6.2 of their Terms and Conditions, stating that no refund can be made once deposits have been used for betting.
However, my complaint is not simply about gambling losses. My concern is that the account remained active after the casino had confirmed in writing that it had been closed.
I also requested detailed account and session data. The casino provided a data report containing personal information, deposits, withdrawals and game summaries, but it did not contain:
session identifiers;
detailed game sessions;
exact timestamps of individual sessions;
information allowing me to identify the sessions concerned.
I have requested these additional details but have not yet received them.
I would like an independent review of why my account remained accessible after the closure confirmation of 18 May and whether the losses incurred during this period should remain entirely my responsibility.
I have attached all relevant emails and documents.
On 18 May 2026, I requested the closure of my Robocat account.
On the same day, the casino support team confirmed by email that my account had been successfully closed.
However, after receiving this confirmation, I discovered that my account was still fully accessible. I was able to log in, deposit money and continue playing.
On 20 May 2026, after realizing that the account was still active and after returning to the platform, I sent another email asking the casino not to proceed with the closure.
On 24 May 2026, I sent a new request asking for my account to be closed.
Robocat later informed me that my account had actually been closed on 24 May 2026.
The main issue is that the casino confirmed on 18 May that my account had been closed, while the account remained accessible until 24 May.
During this period, I continued gambling and incurred losses totaling approximately €951.
I requested a refund because these losses occurred during a period in which I had already been informed that my account had been closed.
The casino refused my request by referring to section 6.6.2 of their Terms and Conditions, stating that no refund can be made once deposits have been used for betting.
However, my complaint is not simply about gambling losses. My concern is that the account remained active after the casino had confirmed in writing that it had been closed.
I also requested detailed account and session data. The casino provided a data report containing personal information, deposits, withdrawals and game summaries, but it did not contain:
session identifiers;
detailed game sessions;
exact timestamps of individual sessions;
information allowing me to identify the sessions concerned.
I have requested these additional details but have not yet received them.
I would like an independent review of why my account remained accessible after the closure confirmation of 18 May and whether the losses incurred during this period should remain entirely my responsibility.
I have attached all relevant emails and documents.