Thank you for providing the information and evidence Nick / Raging Bull Team.
Dear Chaos86,
I have received and reviewed the evidence relating to your gameplay and, most importantly, your bonus history.
The available evidence indicates that you claimed and utilized multiple no-deposit bonuses without making a qualifying "clean" real-money deposit between them, as required under the applicable bonus rules, which you accepted upon registering your account and claiming the bonuses:

Additionally, the evidence confirms that the disputed winnings originated from a free bonus, specifically RAGINGDIVA30.
The real-money deposit made afterward was merely the standard account verification/confirmation deposit required prior to processing a withdrawal. It was not materially connected to the generation of the winnings, contrary to what you have suggested.
That being said, based on the available information, the casino appears to have acted in line with its publicly available rules, and I have not identified any grounds to consider the actions taken as unfair.
As a result, this case will be closed as Rejected.
For future reference, I strongly encourage you to carefully review and adhere to all applicable casino terms and promotional conditions before participating in bonus offers, as doing so may help avoid similar situations.
Should you encounter any issues with this or any other casino in the future, please do not hesitate to contact us. We will always endeavour to review the matter fairly and provide assistance to the best of our abilities.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Thank you for providing the information and evidence Nick / Raging Bull Team.
Dear Chaos86,
I have received and reviewed the evidence relating to your gameplay and, most importantly, your bonus history.
The available evidence indicates that you claimed and utilized multiple no-deposit bonuses without making a qualifying "clean" real-money deposit between them, as required under the applicable bonus rules, which you accepted upon registering your account and claiming the bonuses:

Additionally, the evidence confirms that the disputed winnings originated from a free bonus, specifically RAGINGDIVA30.
The real-money deposit made afterward was merely the standard account verification/confirmation deposit required prior to processing a withdrawal. It was not materially connected to the generation of the winnings, contrary to what you have suggested.
That being said, based on the available information, the casino appears to have acted in line with its publicly available rules, and I have not identified any grounds to consider the actions taken as unfair.
As a result, this case will be closed as Rejected.
For future reference, I strongly encourage you to carefully review and adhere to all applicable casino terms and promotional conditions before participating in bonus offers, as doing so may help avoid similar situations.
Should you encounter any issues with this or any other casino in the future, please do not hesitate to contact us. We will always endeavour to review the matter fairly and provide assistance to the best of our abilities.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru