Hello everyone,
thank you both for your cooperation and for providing additional information regarding this case.
I have carefully reviewed the explanation and evidence submitted by the casino privately, including the verification materials related to the account review process. Based on the evidence provided, I find that the casino has presented sufficient grounds for the account closure and confiscation of winnings due to serious concerns identified during the verification process. In particular, the submitted documentation raised substantial authenticity concerns during the anti-fraud review, and the casino’s actions appear to have been taken in accordance with their security and Anti-Fraud policies.
While I understand the player’s frustration with the verification procedure, casinos are obligated to perform identity and fraud prevention checks, especially in cases where irregularities are detected during the KYC review.
After assessing all currently available evidence, I am unable to conclude that the casino acted unfairly in this matter.
For this reason, this complaint will now be rejected.
If the player disagrees with this outcome, they still have the option to escalate the matter directly to the casino’s licensing authority or appointed ADR service. Information regarding the relevant authority should be available in the casino’s Terms & Conditions or in the footer section of the casino’s website.
Best regards,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Hello everyone,
thank you both for your cooperation and for providing additional information regarding this case.
I have carefully reviewed the explanation and evidence submitted by the casino privately, including the verification materials related to the account review process. Based on the evidence provided, I find that the casino has presented sufficient grounds for the account closure and confiscation of winnings due to serious concerns identified during the verification process. In particular, the submitted documentation raised substantial authenticity concerns during the anti-fraud review, and the casino’s actions appear to have been taken in accordance with their security and Anti-Fraud policies.
While I understand the player’s frustration with the verification procedure, casinos are obligated to perform identity and fraud prevention checks, especially in cases where irregularities are detected during the KYC review.
After assessing all currently available evidence, I am unable to conclude that the casino acted unfairly in this matter.
For this reason, this complaint will now be rejected.
If the player disagrees with this outcome, they still have the option to escalate the matter directly to the casino’s licensing authority or appointed ADR service. Information regarding the relevant authority should be available in the casino’s Terms & Conditions or in the footer section of the casino’s website.
Best regards,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Edited by a Casino Guru admin