Hello Tomas,
Thank you for the update. I believe there may be a misunderstanding of the situation, so I would like to clarify a few important points before this complaint is closed.
My complaint is not solely about winnings being confiscated.
My complaint is about LuckyBlock knowingly allowing prohibited-jurisdiction players (including myself in the United States) to deposit and gamble for years, despite the casino being fully aware of my location and even discussing it with me in email.
They continued allowing deposits after confirming I was in the U.S., which is itself a prohibited jurisdiction.
LuckyBlock’s conduct still caused financial harm.
Over the years, I deposited approximately $40,000+ across both accounts.
LuckyBlock never performed identity verification while accepting those deposits.
However, when U.S. players attempt withdrawals, LuckyBlock has a documented pattern (with many similar player reports publicly available) of suddenly enforcing KYC strictly and blocking or denying payouts.
This is not a simple "restricted country" issue—this is a deliberate business practice that exposes players to guaranteed loss because the casino knows they will never allow withdrawals if the player wins.
The low balance in the recent video does not invalidate the complaint.
The complaint concerns all deposits made under two accounts while LuckyBlock knowingly permitted a prohibited user to continue gambling.
The current balance is irrelevant to the fact that:
The accounts remain open
The casino continued allowing deposits
The casino has a policy of blocking withdrawals from U.S. players
The accounts should never have been allowed to gamble in the first place
This issue is not about an ancient dispute.
My complaint is about LuckyBlock’s ongoing unlawful operation and the fact that both of my accounts remain active today, despite the casino previously acknowledging my prohibited location.
Their continued allowance of deposits over the years—even after being informed—is an ongoing misconduct, not a closed, time-barred matter.
I am not claiming a specific $50,000 withdrawal attempt was denied recently.
I am stating that the total amount deposited and never withdrawable due to LuckyBlock’s policies is approximately $40,000–$50,000.
LuckyBlock’s system ensures that U.S. players cannot withdraw anything—not winnings and not deposits.
This is the core of the dispute.
This case is directly within Casino Guru’s stated investigation criteria.
You wrote that you investigate cases where:
a casino accepts restricted players
allows them to deposit and play
and then refuses withdrawals because of their jurisdiction
This is exactly the scenario I have described and shown in screenshots:
LuckyBlock knowingly accepted deposits from a U.S. player, acknowledged my jurisdiction, and still kept the account active—while maintaining a withdrawal restriction policy for U.S. users.
For these reasons, I do not believe the complaint should be closed, as the issues presented match Casino Guru’s investigation policy precisely. If you need additional screenshots, emails, timeline details, or proof of deposits, I am fully prepared to provide them.
Please let me know what further information you require. Thank you.
Hello Tomas,
Thank you for the update. I believe there may be a misunderstanding of the situation, so I would like to clarify a few important points before this complaint is closed.
My complaint is not solely about winnings being confiscated.
My complaint is about LuckyBlock knowingly allowing prohibited-jurisdiction players (including myself in the United States) to deposit and gamble for years, despite the casino being fully aware of my location and even discussing it with me in email.
They continued allowing deposits after confirming I was in the U.S., which is itself a prohibited jurisdiction.
LuckyBlock’s conduct still caused financial harm.
Over the years, I deposited approximately $40,000+ across both accounts.
LuckyBlock never performed identity verification while accepting those deposits.
However, when U.S. players attempt withdrawals, LuckyBlock has a documented pattern (with many similar player reports publicly available) of suddenly enforcing KYC strictly and blocking or denying payouts.
This is not a simple "restricted country" issue—this is a deliberate business practice that exposes players to guaranteed loss because the casino knows they will never allow withdrawals if the player wins.
The low balance in the recent video does not invalidate the complaint.
The complaint concerns all deposits made under two accounts while LuckyBlock knowingly permitted a prohibited user to continue gambling.
The current balance is irrelevant to the fact that:
The accounts remain open
The casino continued allowing deposits
The casino has a policy of blocking withdrawals from U.S. players
The accounts should never have been allowed to gamble in the first place
This issue is not about an ancient dispute.
My complaint is about LuckyBlock’s ongoing unlawful operation and the fact that both of my accounts remain active today, despite the casino previously acknowledging my prohibited location.
Their continued allowance of deposits over the years—even after being informed—is an ongoing misconduct, not a closed, time-barred matter.
I am not claiming a specific $50,000 withdrawal attempt was denied recently.
I am stating that the total amount deposited and never withdrawable due to LuckyBlock’s policies is approximately $40,000–$50,000.
LuckyBlock’s system ensures that U.S. players cannot withdraw anything—not winnings and not deposits.
This is the core of the dispute.
This case is directly within Casino Guru’s stated investigation criteria.
You wrote that you investigate cases where:
a casino accepts restricted players
allows them to deposit and play
and then refuses withdrawals because of their jurisdiction
This is exactly the scenario I have described and shown in screenshots:
LuckyBlock knowingly accepted deposits from a U.S. player, acknowledged my jurisdiction, and still kept the account active—while maintaining a withdrawal restriction policy for U.S. users.
For these reasons, I do not believe the complaint should be closed, as the issues presented match Casino Guru’s investigation policy precisely. If you need additional screenshots, emails, timeline details, or proof of deposits, I am fully prepared to provide them.
Please let me know what further information you require. Thank you.