I was previously advised that my complaint could not proceed because I did not have documentary evidence. I have now recovered and forwarded to you the full email thread from Casino Joy, which clearly shows that I asked for my account to be blocked and excluded due to gambling harm and financial distress.
I had also previously self-excluded from Casino Joy for the same reasons, which makes my later requests even more serious and should have triggered immediate protection.
On 21 January 2026, I emailed Casino Joy stating:
"I no longer wish to gamble and can’t afford to.
Close and block account permanently."
This was a clear request to be excluded from gambling due to harm.
Instead of actioning this request, Casino Joy replied asking why I wanted to leave and attempted to keep me engaged. I responded again later the same day:
"CLOSE AND BLOCK THE ACCOUNT.
I HAVE TOLD YOU I HAVE ISSUES.
THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE."
Despite this explicit statement of vulnerability and a direct instruction to block and exclude my account, Casino Joy did not apply any restriction. Instead, they replied offering options such as deposit limits and cooling-off tools while leaving my account active and usable.
In addition to the emails, I also repeatedly requested exclusion via Casino Joy’s live chat during the same period. These requests were not actioned and I remained able to access and use my account.
I have also received no further communication from Casino Joy since these emails, which has left me with no option but to bring this matter to Casino Guru for independent review.
At no point after these communications was my account blocked or excluded, despite my repeated requests and clear declaration that I could not afford to gamble and was experiencing gambling harm.
Under responsible gambling standards, when a player states gambling harm or financial distress and asks for their account to be blocked or excluded, the operator must act immediately and must not attempt retention or delay. Casino Joy failed to do this.
I am therefore requesting that this evidence now be reviewed and that my complaint be assessed on its merits. I am seeking a refund of all gambling losses incurred after 21 January 2026, when I first asked for my account to be blocked and excluded.
All relevant email evidence has now been forwarded to you.
I was previously advised that my complaint could not proceed because I did not have documentary evidence. I have now recovered and forwarded to you the full email thread from Casino Joy, which clearly shows that I asked for my account to be blocked and excluded due to gambling harm and financial distress.
I had also previously self-excluded from Casino Joy for the same reasons, which makes my later requests even more serious and should have triggered immediate protection.
On 21 January 2026, I emailed Casino Joy stating:
"I no longer wish to gamble and can’t afford to.
Close and block account permanently."
This was a clear request to be excluded from gambling due to harm.
Instead of actioning this request, Casino Joy replied asking why I wanted to leave and attempted to keep me engaged. I responded again later the same day:
"CLOSE AND BLOCK THE ACCOUNT.
I HAVE TOLD YOU I HAVE ISSUES.
THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE."
Despite this explicit statement of vulnerability and a direct instruction to block and exclude my account, Casino Joy did not apply any restriction. Instead, they replied offering options such as deposit limits and cooling-off tools while leaving my account active and usable.
In addition to the emails, I also repeatedly requested exclusion via Casino Joy’s live chat during the same period. These requests were not actioned and I remained able to access and use my account.
I have also received no further communication from Casino Joy since these emails, which has left me with no option but to bring this matter to Casino Guru for independent review.
At no point after these communications was my account blocked or excluded, despite my repeated requests and clear declaration that I could not afford to gamble and was experiencing gambling harm.
Under responsible gambling standards, when a player states gambling harm or financial distress and asks for their account to be blocked or excluded, the operator must act immediately and must not attempt retention or delay. Casino Joy failed to do this.
I am therefore requesting that this evidence now be reviewed and that my complaint be assessed on its merits. I am seeking a refund of all gambling losses incurred after 21 January 2026, when I first asked for my account to be blocked and excluded.
All relevant email evidence has now been forwarded to you.