Dear kloobus87,
Thank you for your reply and for providing additional details.
After carefully reviewing all the information you’ve shared, we unfortunately have to reject this complaint.
From your own description, your account was reopened after you provided a bank statement to confirm your identity. Even though your original request concerned obtaining an account statement under GDPR, the document you submitted fulfilled the outstanding verification requirement. As a result, the casino system marked your account as verified and active again. In such cases, reactivation is typically an automated outcome once identity verification is successfully completed.
You later chose to log in and actively play on February 13th. At that point, you were able to access the account, deposit, play, cancel your withdrawal, and continue gambling. This clearly indicates that the account was fully accessible and under your control. The subsequent loss of funds occurred as a result of gameplay after you voluntarily cancelled the withdrawal request.
Regarding the additional request for address verification: casinos are obligated to complete full KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures before processing withdrawals, especially when higher amounts are involved. It is not unusual for operators to request supplementary documents even if a bank statement was previously submitted, particularly if the earlier document was used for identity confirmation and not formally approved for address verification within their compliance system. Requesting further documentation before approving a €2,500 withdrawal is a standard regulatory practice and does not in itself indicate unfair treatment or deliberate delay.
Concerning your concern about reopening a previously closed account: unless the account was closed due to a formally registered gambling problem or self-exclusion, casinos are generally permitted to reopen accounts upon the player's request. There is no indication that your account had an active self-exclusion or gambling block in place at the time of reopening.
Based on the evidence provided, we do not see sufficient grounds to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or intentionally delayed your withdrawal due to your player profile. Since the balance was lost after you voluntarily cancelled the withdrawal and continued playing, we are unable to hold the casino responsible for those losses.
Due to the aforementioned reasons, we will now proceed to reject this complaint. Thank you for your understanding. I am genuinely sorry that we were not able to assist you more effectively in this particular situation, as we always aim to help players resolve their issues whenever possible.
Please remember that you are welcome to contact us again if you run into any problems with this or any other casino in the future. Whether it is a question, a concern or a new issue that needs to be looked into, our team is here and ready to support you.
Dear kloobus87,
Thank you for your reply and for providing additional details.
After carefully reviewing all the information you’ve shared, we unfortunately have to reject this complaint.
From your own description, your account was reopened after you provided a bank statement to confirm your identity. Even though your original request concerned obtaining an account statement under GDPR, the document you submitted fulfilled the outstanding verification requirement. As a result, the casino system marked your account as verified and active again. In such cases, reactivation is typically an automated outcome once identity verification is successfully completed.
You later chose to log in and actively play on February 13th. At that point, you were able to access the account, deposit, play, cancel your withdrawal, and continue gambling. This clearly indicates that the account was fully accessible and under your control. The subsequent loss of funds occurred as a result of gameplay after you voluntarily cancelled the withdrawal request.
Regarding the additional request for address verification: casinos are obligated to complete full KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures before processing withdrawals, especially when higher amounts are involved. It is not unusual for operators to request supplementary documents even if a bank statement was previously submitted, particularly if the earlier document was used for identity confirmation and not formally approved for address verification within their compliance system. Requesting further documentation before approving a €2,500 withdrawal is a standard regulatory practice and does not in itself indicate unfair treatment or deliberate delay.
Concerning your concern about reopening a previously closed account: unless the account was closed due to a formally registered gambling problem or self-exclusion, casinos are generally permitted to reopen accounts upon the player's request. There is no indication that your account had an active self-exclusion or gambling block in place at the time of reopening.
Based on the evidence provided, we do not see sufficient grounds to conclude that the casino acted unfairly or intentionally delayed your withdrawal due to your player profile. Since the balance was lost after you voluntarily cancelled the withdrawal and continued playing, we are unable to hold the casino responsible for those losses.
Due to the aforementioned reasons, we will now proceed to reject this complaint. Thank you for your understanding. I am genuinely sorry that we were not able to assist you more effectively in this particular situation, as we always aim to help players resolve their issues whenever possible.
Please remember that you are welcome to contact us again if you run into any problems with this or any other casino in the future. Whether it is a question, a concern or a new issue that needs to be looked into, our team is here and ready to support you.