Dear Katarina,
Thank you for your reply. I will answer your questions below, but I would also like to provide essential context because the issue with the VIP Chip bonus is not an isolated incident. I have experienced a number of inconsistencies at Blaze Spins that, taken together, show a pattern of unclear or contradictory rules that can place players at a significant disadvantage.
To address your questions first:
- I have been a player at Blaze Spins since 22 September 2025.
- This was not my first bonus with the casino.
- Yes, I can provide my game history and will email it to you shortly.
Now, regarding the broader pattern that directly relates to the present complaint:
Before the VIP Chip incident, I encountered several situations where the casino’s displayed information, promotional materials, and support explanations contradicted one another.
One example comes from a promotional email I received for a daily "no strings" bonus, which stated:
"Example: Deposit $100 → Play with $120
Withdraw after just 1x playthrough."
and:
"Available daily. Max bonus $500. Wagering: 1x. Applies to all games. No redemption limit."
There was no mention of any "sticky" or locked component; however, after completing the wagering requirement, support informed me that €10 of my balance was considered a non-withdrawable bonus amount, even though my wallet showed the entire sum as withdrawable with 0 wagering remaining. This is not aligned with industry standards, where restricted funds are always visibly separated.
I then encountered the following issue with free spins: I was sent a promotional email offering 20 free spins, but the link was broken. When I contacted Live Chat, I was told the spins could not be applied because "it’s mixing funds and it’s strictly against casino rules." Yet at that same moment, my account allowed me to manually activate a different set of 50 free spins with no warning of any kind, and nothing in the terms indicated that activating those spins would create a "mixed funds" situation or endanger my balance.
This creates a dangerous loophole for players. To illustrate: imagine a player has €100 in their balance, activates free spins in good faith, wins €2, then continues to play successfully and increases their total balance to €800. Under the casino’s interpretation, those €2 of free spin winnings could be used after the fact as grounds to refuse a payout for the entire €800, even though the system itself allowed the activation. A player acting in good faith could be penalized because the system permits something the support later claims is "against the rules."
My central point is this: if certain funds are non-withdrawable, the wallet should clearly reflect it. If mixing funds is prohibited, the system should simply prevent a player from activating any free spins while they have an existing balance. Instead, Blaze Spins’ interface suggests something is allowed, and only afterwards does support claim it was not.
This brings me to the current issue with the VIP Chip bonus, which follows the same pattern:
• The bonus window displayed 1 day and 18 hours remaining.
• I was nearly finished wagering.
• Live Chat confirmed that "everything looks good" and saw no sign of expiry.
• The bonus vanished mid-round, removing €118.75 from my balance.
• Only after the balance disappeared was I given an explanation that contradicts both the on-screen timer and the information provided by support.
Given the repeated mismatches between what Blaze Spins shows to players and what they later enforce, it is difficult to have confidence in the accuracy of their explanations.
For these reasons, I am requesting:
• Reinstatement of the VIP Chip bonus with the correct remaining wagering requirement,
• Restoration of the €118.75 balance removed without warning, and
• A clear explanation of why the bonus was removed despite the system indicating that it was valid for another day and 18 hours.
I will forward my game history shortly. Thank you for your assistance.
Dear Katarina,
Thank you for your reply. I will answer your questions below, but I would also like to provide essential context because the issue with the VIP Chip bonus is not an isolated incident. I have experienced a number of inconsistencies at Blaze Spins that, taken together, show a pattern of unclear or contradictory rules that can place players at a significant disadvantage.
To address your questions first:
- I have been a player at Blaze Spins since 22 September 2025.
- This was not my first bonus with the casino.
- Yes, I can provide my game history and will email it to you shortly.
Now, regarding the broader pattern that directly relates to the present complaint:
Before the VIP Chip incident, I encountered several situations where the casino’s displayed information, promotional materials, and support explanations contradicted one another.
One example comes from a promotional email I received for a daily "no strings" bonus, which stated:
"Example: Deposit $100 → Play with $120
Withdraw after just 1x playthrough."
and:
"Available daily. Max bonus $500. Wagering: 1x. Applies to all games. No redemption limit."
There was no mention of any "sticky" or locked component; however, after completing the wagering requirement, support informed me that €10 of my balance was considered a non-withdrawable bonus amount, even though my wallet showed the entire sum as withdrawable with 0 wagering remaining. This is not aligned with industry standards, where restricted funds are always visibly separated.
I then encountered the following issue with free spins: I was sent a promotional email offering 20 free spins, but the link was broken. When I contacted Live Chat, I was told the spins could not be applied because "it’s mixing funds and it’s strictly against casino rules." Yet at that same moment, my account allowed me to manually activate a different set of 50 free spins with no warning of any kind, and nothing in the terms indicated that activating those spins would create a "mixed funds" situation or endanger my balance.
This creates a dangerous loophole for players. To illustrate: imagine a player has €100 in their balance, activates free spins in good faith, wins €2, then continues to play successfully and increases their total balance to €800. Under the casino’s interpretation, those €2 of free spin winnings could be used after the fact as grounds to refuse a payout for the entire €800, even though the system itself allowed the activation. A player acting in good faith could be penalized because the system permits something the support later claims is "against the rules."
My central point is this: if certain funds are non-withdrawable, the wallet should clearly reflect it. If mixing funds is prohibited, the system should simply prevent a player from activating any free spins while they have an existing balance. Instead, Blaze Spins’ interface suggests something is allowed, and only afterwards does support claim it was not.
This brings me to the current issue with the VIP Chip bonus, which follows the same pattern:
• The bonus window displayed 1 day and 18 hours remaining.
• I was nearly finished wagering.
• Live Chat confirmed that "everything looks good" and saw no sign of expiry.
• The bonus vanished mid-round, removing €118.75 from my balance.
• Only after the balance disappeared was I given an explanation that contradicts both the on-screen timer and the information provided by support.
Given the repeated mismatches between what Blaze Spins shows to players and what they later enforce, it is difficult to have confidence in the accuracy of their explanations.
For these reasons, I am requesting:
• Reinstatement of the VIP Chip bonus with the correct remaining wagering requirement,
• Restoration of the €118.75 balance removed without warning, and
• A clear explanation of why the bonus was removed despite the system indicating that it was valid for another day and 18 hours.
I will forward my game history shortly. Thank you for your assistance.