Dear Dominika,
Thank you once again for taking the time to look into my case.
To reiterate and clarify the core concerns:
I am fully KYC-verified.
I had no active bonuses.
I had made successful withdrawals in the past.
My Revolut account and card were verified and accepted for deposits.
The issue began when I attempted to withdraw my balance and received several rejections, without any clear or consistent explanation. I was instructed multiple times to "re-enter my IBAN" or that it would be approved "within three hours," but no warning was ever provided that the Revolut method may not be accepted for withdrawals — despite it being fully verified and successfully used for deposits. This is highly misleading, and raises the question: why verify a payment method if it is not eligible for both deposits and withdrawals?This should have been addressed in the verification process that i would not be eligible to withdraw with this method.
As a result of this confusion, and after multiple failed attempts, I became increasingly uncertain and stressed about the status of my funds. The casino’s support provided no clarity, no direct communication from management, and no guidance. The prolonged uncertainty triggered frustration, doubt, and eventually impulsive behavior. Believing my funds were essentially stuck or lost, I canceled the withdrawal and played them. This was not an informed or intentional decision — it was a reaction to a lack of transparency and emotional pressure in a gambling environment.
While I accept responsibility for canceling the withdrawal, the context and the environment created by the casino must also be taken into account. Casinos have a duty of care, particularly under Curacao eGaming licensing standards, to treat players fairly, communicate clearly, and support responsible gambling behavior. This is reflected in Article 6 of the Curacao Code of Conduct, which emphasizes transparency and fair handling of player funds.
As a VIP customer, I expected a higher level of support and care. Repeated failed withdrawals should have triggered a proactive review or at least some kind of managerial intervention. Instead, I was left alone to guess what was wrong — ultimately making a decision I now regret.
This situation has created a sense of mistrust and disappointment, especially considering that a verified payment method (Revolut) was used legitimately but still resulted in withheld access to funds without proper explanation. That inconsistency alone would be deeply troubling to any player — let alone one at VIP level.
I respectfully request that this matter be evaluated in light of the responsibilities of licensed casinos to manage player funds with clarity, transparency, and fairness. I am hopeful that with Casino Guru’s help, this can be resolved not just by the letter of the rules, but in line with the broader principles of ethical gambling operations.
Kind regards,
Dionysis
Dear Dominika,
Thank you once again for taking the time to look into my case.
To reiterate and clarify the core concerns:
I am fully KYC-verified.
I had no active bonuses.
I had made successful withdrawals in the past.
My Revolut account and card were verified and accepted for deposits.
The issue began when I attempted to withdraw my balance and received several rejections, without any clear or consistent explanation. I was instructed multiple times to "re-enter my IBAN" or that it would be approved "within three hours," but no warning was ever provided that the Revolut method may not be accepted for withdrawals — despite it being fully verified and successfully used for deposits. This is highly misleading, and raises the question: why verify a payment method if it is not eligible for both deposits and withdrawals?This should have been addressed in the verification process that i would not be eligible to withdraw with this method.
As a result of this confusion, and after multiple failed attempts, I became increasingly uncertain and stressed about the status of my funds. The casino’s support provided no clarity, no direct communication from management, and no guidance. The prolonged uncertainty triggered frustration, doubt, and eventually impulsive behavior. Believing my funds were essentially stuck or lost, I canceled the withdrawal and played them. This was not an informed or intentional decision — it was a reaction to a lack of transparency and emotional pressure in a gambling environment.
While I accept responsibility for canceling the withdrawal, the context and the environment created by the casino must also be taken into account. Casinos have a duty of care, particularly under Curacao eGaming licensing standards, to treat players fairly, communicate clearly, and support responsible gambling behavior. This is reflected in Article 6 of the Curacao Code of Conduct, which emphasizes transparency and fair handling of player funds.
As a VIP customer, I expected a higher level of support and care. Repeated failed withdrawals should have triggered a proactive review or at least some kind of managerial intervention. Instead, I was left alone to guess what was wrong — ultimately making a decision I now regret.
This situation has created a sense of mistrust and disappointment, especially considering that a verified payment method (Revolut) was used legitimately but still resulted in withheld access to funds without proper explanation. That inconsistency alone would be deeply troubling to any player — let alone one at VIP level.
I respectfully request that this matter be evaluated in light of the responsibilities of licensed casinos to manage player funds with clarity, transparency, and fairness. I am hopeful that with Casino Guru’s help, this can be resolved not just by the letter of the rules, but in line with the broader principles of ethical gambling operations.
Kind regards,
Dionysis