HomeComplaintsBeton.win Casino - Player seeks refund after account exclusion issues.

Beton.win Casino - Player seeks refund after account exclusion issues.

Unresolved
Our verdict

Failed self-exclusion

Black points: 231

Amount: $415,000 CLP

Beton.win Casino
Safety Index 6.5 Above average

Case summary

The player from Chile requested a refund of 415,000 CLP due to continued gambling activity on his account despite a self-exclusion request made on February 6th. He highlighted that BetOnWin confirmed his account exclusion but failed to enforce it, leading to further losses. We asked the casino for clarification and transaction records, but it confirmed that the account later became accessible again because of a system error and refused to provide the deposit history or any refund. As the casino maintained its final refusal and the records needed to calculate the eligible net loss were not shared, we closed the complaint as unresolved due to failed self-exclusion.

Written by Martin
Casino Analyst & Complaint Specialist
Submitted: 16 Aug 2026 | Unresolved : 14 Sep 2026
Public
Public
4 weeks ago
esTranslationgb

Hello,

My name is CG, I'm from Chile,


I request a refund of all my losses since February 6th, a total of 415,000 CLP.


It turns out that on February 6th of this year I contacted BetOnWin by email requesting the permanent self-exclusion of my account, since they were not paying attention to me in the live chat, and the page does not have a section to do it manually, the reason for the self-exclusion is because I have a serious gambling problem, and I have told them this repeatedly.


After weeks, on February 23rd, they confirmed that my account had been excluded. I was clean for several months, until July 22nd, when I was able to access my account, logging in as if nothing had happened, and I started betting again. From July 23rd onwards, I requested that my account be excluded, and on July 24th, I contacted BetOnWin by email to request exclusion due to gambling addiction, but they ignored me. I insisted for several days in a row, and today (May 16th, 2025), looking at old emails, I realized that my account was supposedly already excluded (since February 23rd). I saw that the messages were just as negligent as the current ones. I have plenty of evidence that they ignored me when I begged them to exclude my account due to gambling addiction.


Therefore, in addition to permanent exclusion, I am now requesting a refund of losses incurred since February 6th (the date I contacted you by email requesting permanent exclusion). I calculated the losses, subtracting deposits and withdrawals. Between February 6th and February 22nd, I had losses totaling 106,233 CLP, and between July 22nd and August 16th (today), I had losses totaling 309,199 CLP. Adding the two periods gives a total of 415,432 CLP, but I am requesting approximately 415,000 CLP.


I find what BetOnWin is doing terrible, as there are many cases like this.


If you need more information or proof, I'd be happy to give it to you.

Edited by a Casino Guru admin
Automatic translation:
Public
Public
3 weeks ago

Important notice:

Casino Guru will never ask for payments or access to your accounts to complete KYC. If someone claims to be from Casino Guru and does that, do not share any information.

We only contact players through this official complaint thread or via @casino.guru e-mail addresses. Always check the sender’s domain and verify your complaint resolver’s e-mail address by clicking on their avatar visible inside the official complaint thread.

If anything seems suspicious, contact us directly.

Stay safe.

Public
Public
3 weeks ago

Hello,

Thank you very much for submitting this complaint. I'm sorry to hear about the problem you're experiencing. Please allow me to ask you a few questions to clarify your situation.

  • Could you please forward me the original emails containing your self-exclusion requests, starting from February 2026, as well as your most recent conversations with the casino customer support regarding the closure of your account and your refund request? My email address is veronika.f@casino.guru.
  • Did the casino specify how long your self-exclusion would remain valid?
  • Was your account reopened automatically, or did you request the casino to reopen it?
  • Did you receive any emails informing you that your account was available for playing again and that your self-exclusion period had ended?

I hope we will be able to help you resolve this issue as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your reply.

Best regards,

Veronika

Public
Public
3 weeks ago
esTranslationgb

Good morning Veronika, I already sent everything to your email, thank you very much for your attention, I await your response.

Automatic translation:
Public
Public
2 weeks ago

Dear CristobalGomez1

Thank you for your cooperation and for providing all the necessary information. I truly appreciate the time and effort you’ve taken to share everything with us so far.

Your complaint will now move to the next stage of our process and be handled by your dedicated Resolver, Martin (martin.l@casino.guru). This is a standard step in our procedure, as the Resolver will take over communication with the casino directly and manage your case from this point onward.

No action is required from you right now. Your Resolver will reach out through this thread if any additional details are needed. You can rest assured that your case is in very capable hands.

I wish you the best of luck and hope your case will be resolved to your satisfaction soon.

Kind regards,

Veronika

Public
Public
2 weeks ago

Dear CristobalGomez1,


I am sorry to hear about your troubles. I am Martin and I will be handling your complaint from now on. As the first order of business, I would like to invite the Beton.win Casino representative to join the discussion and clarify the handling of your self-exclusion.


Dear casino representative,


could you please review this case and explain your point of view to us? Why was the closure delayed? Additionally, why was the account reopened later on?


The player’s correspondence indicates that:

  1. he expressly requested permanent self-exclusion on 4 February 2026;
  2. the closure was only confirmed on 23 February,
  3. he was able to access the same account again on 22 July;
  4. despite repeatedly requesting exclusion again, the account was not restricted until 17 August.


Please also provide the complete transaction history from 4 February until the final restriction, including dated deposits and withdrawals. The supporting records may be sent privately to me at martin.l@casino.guru.


Thank you in advance for providing us with your view of the issue.

Sensitive attachment
Sensitive attachment
2 weeks ago
esTranslationgb

Dear Sir/Madam,



Thank you for your patience and please excuse the inconvenience and delay in responding to this case.


We confirm that player ****** has been permanently excluded from our platform, as requested on August 21st under Ticket #*******, in which case it was indicated that his request would be reviewed.


He was also informed about the status of his exclusion under Ticket #*******.


We regret the delay in processing this, but we confirm that the player will no longer have access to their account indefinitely.


We remain attentive to any additional information you may need from us.



Kind regards,



Beton.win Casino


Edited by a Casino Guru admin
Automatic translation:
Public
Public
2 weeks ago

Dear casino representative,


thank you for your message and confirming the closure.


Are you willing to provide us with the player's deposit history, so we can calculate a possible refund? Please note that without this information, the case cannot be closed as resolved.

Public
Public
1 week ago
esTranslationgb

Dear Martin,


Thank you for your message and for your patience while we thoroughly reviewed this case.


We would like to clarify that the player's account (Account number removed by Casino Guru) was indeed closed in February, as per their initial request. However, due to a system error, the player was able to regain access to their account at a later date. When the player contacted us again in August to inform us of this situation, we immediately proceeded to permanently close their account, and access remains restricted indefinitely to this day.


Regarding your request for the deposit history, we regret to inform you that, due to confidentiality and data protection policies (NDA), we are unable to share this information.


Furthermore, since the player's closure request was respected and executed as indicated, we would not be able to proceed with a refund in this case.


We understand that this situation may have caused the player inconvenience, and we apologize again for any inconvenience caused.


We greatly appreciate your understanding and that of your team in this process.


We remain available should you need anything else from us.


Kind regards,



Beton.win Casino

Edited by a Casino Guru admin
Automatic translation:
Public
Public
1 week ago
esTranslationgb

Hello Martin and BetOnWin team,


Thanks for the reply, but what the casino is saying really doesn't make any sense.


First, they themselves are admitting in their message that my original self-exclusion request from February was valid and that due to a "system error" on their own website, I was able to continue logging in and placing bets. According to the Fair Play Code and Casino Guru's dispute resolution guidelines, the operator is solely responsible for ensuring that its technical exclusion tools function correctly. Casino Guru's criteria expressly state that if a casino allows deposits after a self-exclusion request due to technical platform failures, the operator must assume responsibility and refund all net deposits made from the date of that initial request.


My request for permanent exclusion due to gambling addiction was notified from my first email on February 4th, and the casino ignored me despite the seriousness of the situation, and on top of that, after I was supposedly already excluded, I was able to enter as if nothing had happened, so I request the refund of funds that entered your platform from that date (February 4th).


Second, they're lying when they say my account was closed immediately in August. On July 22nd, I sent them an email explicitly stating that I had a gambling problem and requesting permanent self-exclusion, and they only closed my account on August 21st. In other words, they let me continue playing and losing money for a whole month after I repeatedly asked them to please close my account because I have a serious gambling problem.


Finally, claiming they can't show the transaction history due to "confidentiality" is just an excuse to avoid facing the facts. The casino must disclose the total deposits and withdrawals for that period and provide refunds, because they failed in all their responsible gambling measures.


I'll wait to hear what Martin says so we can move forward with this.


Greetings.

Automatic translation:
Public
Public
1 week ago

Dear casino representative,


Thank you for your response.


Your explanation confirms the central responsible-gambling failure: the player’s account was closed following his February self-exclusion request but later became accessible again because of a system error, without any reopening request from the player. While we understand this may have been a technical issue or a misunderstanding, the fault lies with the casino. According to our values, the player is undeniably entitled to funds lost after an erroneous reopening.


Moreover, there is also a separate delay following the February request. Please reconsider the refund and provide the player’s dated deposits and withdrawals for the relevant periods so the eligible net loss can be calculated. These records may be sent privately to me at martin.l@casino.guru.


A general reference to confidentiality, data protection, or an NDA is not sufficient to explain why these records cannot be provided. The requested information concerns the player’s own account and is necessary to calculate the financial consequences of the admitted system error. The player initiated this complaint and authorized Casino Guru to mediate the dispute, and the records can be submitted privately rather than published in the complaint thread. If the complete transaction history cannot be shared, the casino may provide a suitably redacted statement showing the dated deposits and withdrawals for the relevant periods. If a specific legal or contractual restriction still prevents even confidential or redacted disclosure, please identify that restriction and explain how it applies to this case.


If the casino maintains its refusal, please confirm this as your final position.

Public
Public
1 week ago
esTranslationgb

Dear Martin,


We would like to clarify that we have been actively collaborating with the client regarding their account closure request and have provided them with the necessary steps to complete the process.


Our VIP Account Management Office is currently handling the request due to the client's VIP status. We are awaiting a response from the client to proceed with the temporary or permanent closure of the account, as appropriate.


We would also like to clarify that at no point has the client's request to close the account been denied. We have simply requested the necessary confirmation and supporting information to determine the type of closure requested and ensure it is processed correctly.


It is also important to note that while the account closure process was pending the customer's response, their account remained active, and they continued to contact us regarding various matters. In fact, their most recent communication concerned the status of a deposit, rather than continuing with the account closure process described above. Therefore, we understand that the customer did not take the necessary steps to complete the account closure request at that time.


We remain at your disposal to assist you and complete the account closure process as soon as we receive your confirmation and the required information.

Automatic translation:
Public
Public
1 week ago

Dear casino representative,


thank you for your cooperation and swift responses so far.


The casino acknowledged that the player’s previously excluded account became accessible again because of a system error. We cannot accept the position that no refund is due merely because the original closure was initially carried out. The erroneous restoration of access is precisely the responsible-gambling failure at the center of this complaint.


There should be no ambiguity or further negotiation regarding the account’s status. Once permanent self-exclusion has been applied because of gambling addiction, it must remain in force. The VIP department should have no role in discussing continued access, retention, or temporary alternatives with the player.


Please therefore provide the casino’s final and unambiguous position:


  1. Does the casino confirm that the account is now permanently closed and will remain inaccessible indefinitely?
  2. Is the casino willing to refund the player’s eligible net losses incurred after the account was erroneously reopened?


If the casino is unwilling to provide the refund, please do let me know so that I can proceed with the conclusion of the complaint.

Edited by a Casino Guru admin
Public
Public
1 week ago

Dear Martin,


We would like to inform you that the customer’s account has been permanently suspended and will not be reactivated, as this was the customer’s request.


We understand the inconvenience this situation may have caused the customer; however, we reiterate our position that, based on the information provided in previous communications, we are unable to issue any type of refund.


We remain at your disposal and once again offer our sincere apologies for this matter. 


We remain available if you need anything else from us.


Kind regards,


Beton.win Casino

Public
Public
1 week ago
esTranslationgb

Hello Martin and BetOnWin team,

The casino's position is untenable, and I request a formal reconsideration before the mediation is concluded.

.

BetOnWin has already explicitly admitted in writing in this same thread that my February request was valid and that, due to a technical error attributable solely to their platform, I was allowed to continue depositing. Withholding funds that were deposited solely due to a failure in their own responsible gaming tools violates not only Casino Guru's Fair Gaming Code, but also the basic obligations of their operating license.

I understand that the representative responding here follows a standard script, but I ask that you escalate this case immediately to the Compliance area or the Legal Management.


If the casino maintains this refusal to refund the net balance generated during its technical failure, not only will it incur a permanent penalty in its security rating with its own admission of error publicly exposed; I will also proceed to file a formal complaint with this complete file and its written statements with the regulatory authority that issued its license.


Risking compliance audits, regulatory processes, and irreversible damage to the brand's reputation by refusing to correct an operational error that you yourselves admitted has no commercial or logical justification.


I urge BetOnWin to review its final position, make the transactions for the period transparent, and agree to the corresponding net balance refund in order to properly close this claim.


Greetings.

Automatic translation:
Public
Public
1 week ago

Dear casino representative,


before proceeding with the closure of this complaint and a deduction of the casino's safety index, I would like to give the casino one more opportunity to have the matter reviewed by its senior management or responsible-gambling department.


From Casino Guru’s perspective, once a player clearly requests permanent self-exclusion because of a gambling problem, the casino must restrict further gambling within a reasonable timeframe. A permanent exclusion must then remain effective indefinitely. It should not expire, be replaced with a temporary restriction, or be reversed without an appropriate basis. A technical or administrative error does not remove the casino’s responsibility for the resulting failure.


In this case, the casino confirmed that the player’s account was closed following his February request but later became accessible again because of a system error. We therefore believe that the player is entitled to:


  • eligible net losses incurred after the reasonable processing period following his original February request and before the account was closed; and
  • eligible net losses incurred from the moment the previously excluded account became accessible again until gambling was finally restricted.


The refund should reflect the player’s net financial loss during these periods, meaning deposits minus withdrawals. Funds successfully withdrawn or otherwise returned to the player should not be included.


If the casino decides to continue with the refund, it may provide the relevant transaction history privately, so the correct refund amount can be calculated.

Public
Public
3 days ago

Dear Martin,


Thank you for your message and for giving us the opportunity to provide further clarification regarding the circumstances surrounding the account closure.


We would first like to reiterate that the player's account is now permanently suspended and will not be reactivated. We fully acknowledge the importance of maintaining the exclusion once it has been applied.


Regarding the circumstances preceding the final closure, we would like to clarify that the cause of case's extended investigation was caused by uncertain, sometimes contradictory behavior performed by the customer, including:


  • Leaving multiple conversations in the middle of a dialogue before they were ended & before the customer received a final answer
  • Periodic bonus requests from the customer
  • Foul language & obscene wording usage towards Customer Support personnel. Since we have a pretty clear communication policy such cases couldn't be ignored.



During the relevant period, the player engaged in different and, at times, contradictory interactions with our support teams. These included requests concerning account closure, requests for bonuses or other account-related matters, conversations that were ended by the player before the matter could be fully clarified, and subsequent communications containing inappropriate language towards support representatives.


Our support teams nevertheless attempted to maintain a constructive dialogue, de-escalate the situation and determine the appropriate course of action. Our intentions are always transparent &  clear regarding any customer's request, including such as self-exclusion initiatives.


We have to ensure that customer really understands the circumstances and consequences of his decisions & is clear in his demands to any matter.


After we receive a clear demand & confirmation of customer's awareness we procede with the execution (if it follows our Rules & regulations). Since we faced some contradictory behavior on customer's behalf  in multiple cases, that is the only reason why situation's resolve took slightly more time than usual. 


We would also like to clarify our position regarding the information requested regarding the payment history, full interactions with the customer and other requested information. This information is subject to confidentiality obligations, applicable privacy requirements, internal data-protection policies and, where applicable, contractual non-disclosure obligations. Consequently, we are unable to disclose or transmit these records to third parties, including through private channels.


This position does not depend on whether the information would be published publicly. The records remain protected information, and our confidentiality and privacy obligations continue to apply even where the information is requested for the purpose of a private mediation process.


We appreciate that Casino Guru would like to establish the relevant financial consequences and understand the reasons for requesting the transaction history. However, we must comply with our confidentiality and data-protection obligations and therefore cannot provide the requested underlying records.


We respectfully maintain our position regarding the refund request based on the information available to us and the circumstances described above. At the same time, we confirm that the account is permanently suspended and that it will not be reactivated.


We are devoted to further fruitful collaboration with CasinoGuru and the customers.

Therefore, we remain open to constructive & honest feedback in the future.


Kind regards,

Beton.win Casino


Public
Public
14 minutes ago

Dear casino representative,


Thank you for your cooperation and explanations.


Nevertheless, Casino Guru’s position remains unchanged. The casino confirmed that the player’s previously excluded account became accessible again due to a system error. The player’s later communication, bonus requests, or conduct toward support do not cancel a permanent self-exclusion applied because of a gambling problem.


As the casino is unwilling to compensate the eligible losses or provide the requested transaction records, we will now close this complaint as unresolved due to failed self-exclusion.


Thank you for your time.


Dear CristobalGomez1,


Unfortunately, the casino has maintained its final position and refused to provide a refund.


The casino confirmed that your account had previously been excluded but later became accessible again because of a system error. Once a permanent self-exclusion has been applied because of a gambling problem, it must remain effective unless there is an appropriate basis for lifting it.


Since the casino has refused both compensation and the records needed to establish the eligible net loss, I am closing this complaint as unresolved due to failed self-exclusion. The unresolved complaint will negatively affect the casino’s Safety Index.


In the meantime, I recommend reaching out to the Anjouan Gaming Licensing Authority and submitting a complaint through the website validator you can find in the footer of the casino's website. They have additional tools and options to assist players in these situations. For guidance on how to effectively submit your complaint to the regulator, you can find helpful information at https://casino.guru/submitting-complaints-to-regulators. If you need any assistance with the submission process or receive a response from the regulator, please don’t hesitate to email me at martin.l@casino.guru


As an additional protective measure, I recommend BetBlocker, a free tool provided by a UK-registered charity. It can anonymously block thousands of gambling websites across multiple devices, either completely or during selected vulnerable periods. Setup is quick, it supports multiple languages, and works quietly in the background. You can also read about Casino Guru’s Global Self-Exclusion Initiative.


Please note that BetBlocker may also block gambling-information websites, including Casino Guru. If you still need access to your complaint or our resources, leave the Casino Guru blocking option unchecked during setup.


I am sorry we could not achieve a more satisfactory outcome.

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience
scamalert_1_alt
Casino Guru employees will never ask for your password or other personal information, try to access your casino or bank account, or request payment for our services.