Your explanation confirms the exact inconsistency I am raising.
You state that:
The no-deposit bonus had a 50 CAD maximum cash-out rule
When I completed the wagering, the system adjusted my balance from 220 CAD to 100 CAD in accordance with that rule
You also confirm that wagering was fully completed
This first adjustment is crucial.
At the moment wagering was completed and my balance was reduced from 220 → 100, the bonus conditions had already been fully enforced and consumed.
From that point forward, the 100 CAD was no longer "potential bonus winnings". It was the final amount allowed after applying the maximum cash-out rule.
In other words, the rule had already been applied.
After this adjustment:
I attempted a withdrawal (refused for KYC)
I continued playing
I made a real money deposit of 20 CAD
My balance fluctuated based on gameplay, eventually reaching ~600 CAD
At this stage, there was no remaining bonus balance, no active wagering, and no pending bonus condition. The bonus had already been closed by your own system through the first balance reduction.
Your reply says:
"the balance remained linked to the original bonus conditions until a withdrawal is requested and completed"
This is incorrect based on your own actions.
If that were true, the system would not have reduced the balance from 220 to 100 at wagering completion. That reduction proves the bonus cycle had ended at that moment.
You cannot both:
Apply the maximum cash-out rule when wagering ends, and
Claim the rule was still pending later at withdrawal
That is a logical contradiction.
The second reduction to 50 CAD is therefore a second application of the same bonus rule on funds that were already adjusted and no longer subject to the bonus.
This is the core issue.
A maximum cash-out rule can only be applied once to bonus winnings. It cannot be re-applied later to gameplay that occurred after the bonus was finalized.
Additionally, I made a real money deposit after this. Even by your own terms, once real funds are mixed with a post-bonus balance, subsequent winnings cannot remain indefinitely tied to an already-consumed bonus.
If the bonus restrictions truly remained active, then:
the first reduction should never have occurred, or
no further reduction should have occurred later
Both cannot be true at the same time.
Therefore, the second adjustment is not an enforcement of bonus terms, but a duplicate application of a rule that had already been executed.
I am requesting that this be reviewed again with attention to the fact that the system already finalized the bonus when it reduced the balance to 100 CAD after wagering completion.
That action ended the bonus lifecycle
Your explanation confirms the exact inconsistency I am raising.
You state that:
The no-deposit bonus had a 50 CAD maximum cash-out rule
When I completed the wagering, the system adjusted my balance from 220 CAD to 100 CAD in accordance with that rule
You also confirm that wagering was fully completed
This first adjustment is crucial.
At the moment wagering was completed and my balance was reduced from 220 → 100, the bonus conditions had already been fully enforced and consumed.
From that point forward, the 100 CAD was no longer "potential bonus winnings". It was the final amount allowed after applying the maximum cash-out rule.
In other words, the rule had already been applied.
After this adjustment:
I attempted a withdrawal (refused for KYC)
I continued playing
I made a real money deposit of 20 CAD
My balance fluctuated based on gameplay, eventually reaching ~600 CAD
At this stage, there was no remaining bonus balance, no active wagering, and no pending bonus condition. The bonus had already been closed by your own system through the first balance reduction.
Your reply says:
"the balance remained linked to the original bonus conditions until a withdrawal is requested and completed"
This is incorrect based on your own actions.
If that were true, the system would not have reduced the balance from 220 to 100 at wagering completion. That reduction proves the bonus cycle had ended at that moment.
You cannot both:
Apply the maximum cash-out rule when wagering ends, and
Claim the rule was still pending later at withdrawal
That is a logical contradiction.
The second reduction to 50 CAD is therefore a second application of the same bonus rule on funds that were already adjusted and no longer subject to the bonus.
This is the core issue.
A maximum cash-out rule can only be applied once to bonus winnings. It cannot be re-applied later to gameplay that occurred after the bonus was finalized.
Additionally, I made a real money deposit after this. Even by your own terms, once real funds are mixed with a post-bonus balance, subsequent winnings cannot remain indefinitely tied to an already-consumed bonus.
If the bonus restrictions truly remained active, then:
the first reduction should never have occurred, or
no further reduction should have occurred later
Both cannot be true at the same time.
Therefore, the second adjustment is not an enforcement of bonus terms, but a duplicate application of a rule that had already been executed.
I am requesting that this be reviewed again with attention to the fact that the system already finalized the bonus when it reduced the balance to 100 CAD after wagering completion.
That action ended the bonus lifecycle