CampoBet Casino Review

The player from Malta had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks before submitting this complaint. Their money hadn't been received yet. The player had reported repeated withdrawal failures, which the casino had attributed to a payment provider glitch. After several correspondences, the player had confirmed that the payout was successfully received from the casino. Consequently, we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from Sweden had deposited 10,000 SEK and won a withdrawal of 50,000 SEK. After passing the verification processes via KreditZ and submitting ID and address proof, her withdrawal had remained in pending status with no communication from the company. The player also reported that her account had been suddenly suspended for self-exclusion, which she had not requested. The casino then asked for a Skype call to complete the verification process. The player had expressed dissatisfaction with the company's handling of the situation. Despite our efforts to assist, the player did not respond to our messages, leading to the rejection of the complaint due to lack of communication.

The player from Sweden had encountered issues with the withdrawal process after her account had been suspended due to failed verification. The casino had experienced a technical error that prevented the payout to her bank account and had asked for e-wallet details, which the player didn't use. She had also requested to reopen her account for verification. Despite our efforts to assist, the player had not responded to our inquiries. Therefore, we were unable to investigate further and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Brazil has made a deposit in the casino and submitted the necessary identification documents, but is facing a delay in account verification, resulting in withdrawal restrictions. The player requested this case to be closed, so we rejected the complaint.

The player from Malta has been trying to verify her account to withdraw 194 euros since March 2023 but the website is not accepting her documents. They also unexpectedly closed her account. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from India's account was closed without a clear reason and was promised a refund. The player provided the required information for the refund including a Skrill screenshot and ID card, but the casino has not responded for over 11 days. After alleged receipt of funds player has stopped responding, therefore, the complaint has been rejected.

The player from Poland was experiencing difficulties completing account verification and the subsequent withdrawal. After the discussion with the casino, we received evidence that the player used a third-party payment method. Since this practice is against the casino's Terms and Conditions, we had to reject the complaint as unjustified.

The player from Finland had his account blocked and was asked to complete account verification. After a closer examination, we ended up rejecting this complaint as there is sufficient evidence the player has breached the casino's terms and conditions by providing forged or tampered documents for verification which is not acceptable.

The player from Brazil is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing account verification. Even though we assumed that the issue had been resolved, without a confirmation from the player, we were forced to reject this complaint.

The player struggled to verify as the casino kept requesting additional documents. The player confirmed that his account was completely verified approximately 3 weeks after he submitted the complaint, and he has already collected a part of his winnings. We consider the complaint resolved.

The player from Russia is experiencing difficulties withdrawing her winnings due to ongoing verification. After the successfull verifiacation the player received her winnings and the complaint is resolved.

The player from Hungary had his winnings cancelled and was accused of opening multiple accounts. This complaint was about sports betting, which we don't have enough insight on, therefore we had to reject this complaint.

The player from Sweden faced issues with Betinia Casino, as his withdrawal had been cancelled due to the use of a different payment method (Zimpler) for the withdrawal than what was used for the recent deposit. To rectify this, the player deposited additional funds using Swish and requested a withdrawal through the same, but had not yet received the funds. Despite our efforts to assist and request additional information for investigation, the player did not respond to our messages. Therefore, we could not further investigate and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Sweden had experienced delayed withdrawal and improper customer service. After he demanded his 5625 krona withdrawal, his account was unexpectedly suspended, and he was denied access to their customer support. The casino had stated that the account was closed in accordance with their procedures and requested the player to provide Skrill account details to process the payment. The player, who had never used Skrill before, created an account and provided the necessary details. The casino then confirmed the payment of the player's balance to his Skrill account. We had marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Bosnia and Herzegovina is unable to upload the documents required for verification. After submitting the complaint, the player informed us that the account was verified. The casino reacted to the complaint and confirmed completing verification as well as having the player's withdrawal processed. The player received the money soon, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from Poland is struggling to withdraw from the casino due to incomplete account verification. After the player's account had been successfully verified, the player confirmed receipt of the payment.

The player from Finland was experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. Few days later, the casino informed us that the player's verification process was concluded and their withdrawal was successfully processed. There were no further updates from the player, however, based on the last update from the casino, the complaint was closed as 'Resolved'.

The player from Portugal was unable to complete the verification process at Yoyo Casino despite having provided all the required documents. As a result, he could not access his balance of 4862 Euros. A claim sent to the casino on September 26 remained unanswered. The issue was resolved after the Complaints Team intervened and contacted the casino for clarification. The player was later informed that the funds would be credited to his Skrill wallet, and he later confirmed that the funds had been successfully received. Since the funds have been successfully received the complaint was deemed resolved.

The player from Iceland had been struggling to withdraw 500 EUR from the casino. Despite having successfully passed the KYC process and uploading numerous documents, the issue had not been resolved. After we intervened and invited the casino's representative to join the conversation, the casino informed us that the player's account had been verified and his pending withdrawal had been processed. The player confirmed he had received his withdrawal, thus resolving the issue.

The player from Iceland had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings hadn't been received yet. The player had had issues with email verification which was preventing the withdrawal. After our intervention, the casino had been able to manually confirm the player's email which allowed the withdrawal process to proceed. The casino then processed the withdrawal and the player confirmed receipt of their winnings. The complaint had been resolved successfully.

The player from Brazil had reported that his deposit, which was made the day before, had not yet reflected in his casino balance. Despite his attempts to reach out to support through chat, they asked him to wait and closed the chat without addressing the issue. We had advised him to contact his payment provider for investigation and not to deposit any more funds until the issue was sorted. Later, the player confirmed that the issue had been resolved. We then marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from Finland had signed up for YoYo Casino and deposited 900€. After winning, they attempted to withdraw but their account was blocked for additional security verification after email verification. Despite repeated communication with the casino, the issue had remained unresolved. The Complaints Team had communicated with the casino on behalf of the player and the casino had stated that the account was blocked due to routine checks for Responsible Gambling procedures. After the player responded to the casino's inquiries, the account had been reopened and the player's issue had been resolved.

The player Finland requested a withdrawal 2 weeks ago, but it hasn't been processed. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany was struggling to withdraw a part his winnings from a bonus. After successfully having had withdrawn most of the amount won, the player's last withdrawal request was denied. At that time, the casino was transferring all accounts of German players to its sister site. The issue was resolved. The player was later able to acccess his account and withdraw his funds from the sister site.

The player from India has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Germany had an active self-exclusion in sister casinos due to a gambling problem. The player believes that he should not have been able to register a new account with Cadabrus Casino. The issue was successfully resolved, the player's deposit was refunded.

The player from Canada is experiencing difficulties withdrawing funds because he cannot request the withdrawal via preferred payment methods. The issue was resolved, and the player eventually received his winnings.

The player from Italy had successfully completed the welcome bonus and requested a withdrawal of €1,500 on 13/05/2024. Despite submitting all requested documentation, the payment was delayed for almost two months, and their account was suspended on 27/06/2024. The player was still owed €1,500 plus approximately €800 in the account. The issue was resolved when the player received the approved withdrawals, although a separate €100 withdrawal was reported missing without trace. The Complaints Team marked the complaint as 'resolved' even though the €100 issue remains unresolved, as it was not part of the disputed amount.

The player from Italy requested a withdrawal of €750 on May 14th, but it hadn't been processed despite providing all requested documentation. The player also expressed concern about the delayed request for sensitive transaction data. The casino confirmed the player's account had been verified, and the player later confirmed that the withdrawal had been successfully credited. The complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from Italy had made multiple deposits at the casino, but had their account suspended for additional verification. They had provided all the necessary documents and had not received any response since May 22. They questioned why these verifications were requested only when they tried to withdraw and not during the deposit transaction. The issue was resolved after the player provided additional documentation, including proof of address and a certification regarding the use of a partner's card. The casino verified the account, and the player's withdrawal was processed successfully.

The player from Chile had been waiting for 13 days for a withdrawal. However, the casino began demanding documents for the verification process. After a series of back and forth communication, the casino asked for a new proof of address as they couldn't accept mobile bills. The player provided a letter from his bank as proof of address. The casino then requested a clear picture as the uploaded one was blurry. After 30 days of document verification, the player received his payment. We had resolved the issue by mediating the communication between the player and the casino, ensuring the player provided the necessary documents for verification.

The player from Poland had encountered difficulties in withdrawing his winnings of PLN 2,000 due to a repetitive profile verification process. Despite having provided various types of documents for address confirmation, all his applications had been rejected and the casino had not been responsive to his emails. After we had reached out to the casino to clarify the required documents for verification, the player had managed to submit a satisfactory document from the court. Consequently, the casino accepted this document, finalized the verification process, and paid out the winnings. The player's issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from Finland had his account blocked without further explanation. The casino has found out that the player was previously self-excluded at this casino, however the remaining funds were paid out.