4raBet Casino Review

The player from India had attempted to withdraw 5513 INR after verifying his account. Despite multiple withdrawal requests since February 2024, all had remained in "created" status. Repeatedly contacting support only resulted in being told that the issue was being sent to the relevant team without resolution. The Complaints Team intervened, and the casino confirmed that the player's account was verified and the payment was on its way. However, the player did not confirm it and stopped responding completely, so the complaint was closed accordingly.

The player from India had deposited money into the casino, but the funds were not credited to his account. Despite multiple communications between the player, the Complaints Team, and the casino, it was determined that the funds had been sent to another merchant, as indicated by the casino's evidence. The Complaints Team, after thorough review, concluded that the complaint had to be denied, stating that the funds were not received by the casino. The player was advised to reach out for further assistance if needed in the future.

The player from India faced issues depositing money into 4Rabet due to a system error when submitting the UTR number. He was unable to complete the manual submission and did not receive proper or timely support from the casino. We informed the player that if the deposit had not been credited, the payment provider must investigate. Despite extending the response time, the player did not provide the necessary information, leading to the complaint being rejected due to lack of communication.

The player from India had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout had not been received yet. We advised patience as withdrawals could take up to 14 days. However, the player did not respond to follow-up messages and questions. Consequently, the complaint was rejected due to lack of communication.

The player from India had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout had not been received yet. The player decided to close the complaint after losing the money by placing a bet from the main balance, which resulted in the withdrawal failing. The complaint was rejected as per the player’s explicit request.

The player from India had deposited 109,500 INR and won 434,450 INR but was unable to withdraw the winnings as the casino alleged multiple accounts. The player had submitted verification documents but still faced withdrawal denial. The player admitted to initially sharing an account with a friend before creating his own, which violated the casino's terms and conditions. Due to this violation, we were unable to assist further, and the complaint was rejected.

The player from India had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings hadn't been received yet. The player reported that the withdrawal status showed as "paid out" on the casino's website, but the amount hadn’t been credited to his bank account. After some time, the player confirmed that the withdrawal had been successfully credited to his bank account. The complaint was then marked as resolved by us.

The player from India made a withdrawal, which showed as paid out, but the money had not reached his bank account. The issue was resolved after the player confirmed receiving the money. The complaint was closed as resolved.

The player from India faced an issue with account verification at 4rabet Casino due to an incorrect date of birth entered during account creation. We requested additional information and communication details with the casino, but the player did not respond. As a result, the complaint was rejected due to a lack of response and necessary details from the player.

The player from India had completed the verification and successfully withdrew 20k. However, when attempting to withdraw 30k with more than 130,000 in the account, the player's account was suddenly blocked for failing verification. The casino provided evidence that the player had violated the terms by using multiple accounts. Consequently, the complaint was closed as unjustified due to the breach of the casino's rules and its relation to sports betting, which fell outside our scope of assistance.

The player from India had made a deposit that was not credited for 4 days. We advised the player to contact the payment provider for investigation, noting that it could be a lengthy process. The player later confirmed that the money had been credited to his account. The complaint was marked as resolved.

The player from India had successfully verified his account initially and had withdrawn funds multiple times. After winning 25,000 rupees on a slot game and withdrawing 20,000 rupees, his account was blocked five minutes later. The Complaints Team investigated the case and found that the casino had evidence suggesting the player had violated terms by potentially using a multi-account. The player acknowledged that multiple people in his household used the same device, which led to reasonable suspicions of multiple accounting. Consequently, the complaint was rejected as the casino acted in accordance with its terms and conditions.

The player from India had deposited and won on 4rabet. However, after he successfully submitted the requested verification documents, the casino blocked his account for failed verification. The player had been using the account for three days, had deposited 4000 Rs, wagered a bonus, and won 740 Rs through sports betting. We informed the player that due to the nature of his activities, predominantly sports betting, we were unable to assist. We offered to provide a list of websites that might be able to help him with his issue and closed the complaint.

The player from India had deposited 1000 INR into his casino account, but the funds weren't initially credited. We had advised him to contact his payment provider to investigate the issue, as the casino usually couldn't intervene in these cases. Afterward, the player confirmed that the funds had been received. Consequently, we had marked the complaint as resolved.

The player from India had claimed his account was blocked due to false allegations of him owning multiple accounts, which resulted in his funds being withheld. He maintained that his account had been successfully verified in the past. Despite the player's willingness to provide necessary evidence to prove his innocence, we had to reject the complaint due to his lack of response to our further inquiries. As a result, we were unable to carry out additional investigations or suggest possible solutions.

The player from India experienced a block on his 4rabet account due to allegedly failed verification and violation of rules — which he denied. Consequently, his funds of 12505 were put on hold. After reviewing all the necessary information and evidence provided by the casino, we determined that the player had failed the KYC process and breached the casino's terms and conditions by creating multiple accounts from the same IP address and engaging in similar gameplay. The complaint was rejected as unjustified based on these findings.

The player from India had trouble withdrawing his winnings due to his account being blocked for verification, despite his claim that he had already verified the account. However, the player later requested his complaint be closed, leading us to close the case as per his request.

The player from India had faced issues with 4rabet casino--after submitting for verification to allow withdrawals, his account got blocked despite initially being told it had successfully completed verification. The casino did not respond to his queries. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the player had violated the casino's rules by creating multiple accounts. Despite the player's denial, the casino provided undeniable evidence of this violation. As such, we had deemed the casino's actions as justified and had rejected the player's complaint.

The player from India had been blocked by 4rabet, citing fraudulent activity after he had earned bonus money. The player claimed that his account had been blocked unfairly after he had won a sum of INR7500. The casino, however, maintained that the player had violated their rules by using multiple accounts. The Complaints Team had requested proof from the casino, which was provided and confirmed the player's violation. Consequently, the player's complaint was rejected as the casino's actions were deemed justified.

The player from India had reported that his account at the casino had been blocked without any prior notice due to a failed verification process. He had claimed to have won INR 200,000 through betting games without using any active bonus. The player had further clarified that he had submitted all necessary documents for verification and denied having multiple accounts. However, the casino had provided evidence that the player had multiple accounts, which was a violation of their rules. Consequently, we found the casino's actions to have been justified and the player's complaint was rejected.

The player from India had reported that his 4Rabet account was blocked due to a failed verification. The player had provided the necessary documents for verification but received no specific reason for the account block from the casino. After we investigated, we contacted 4Rabet, who claimed the player was blocked for multi-accounting. However, the casino did not provide any substantial evidence to support their claim. Despite our attempts to resolve the issue, the casino's lack of cooperation led us to mark the complaint as 'unresolved'. We recommended the player to contact Gaming Curacao for further assistance. Later, the casino provided evidence of the player's multiple accounts, which was a violation of their terms and conditions. As a result, the complaint was rejected.

The player from Spain had been unsuccessful in withdrawing her winnings since November 27, 2023. Despite having sent emails, she had received no response and was unable to access the casino's website. After a series of communications, she provided a screenshot of her account, but it appeared to be from a different website than 4raBet Casino. We had advised her against making any deposits to the questionable website and asked her to contact the casino via their official support email. However, she did not respond to our subsequent messages. As a result, we were unable to investigate her complaint further and had to reject it.

The player from Brazil had made a withdrawal request, and was informed it would be processed within 24 hours. After that period, despite her efforts to contact customer service, she hadn't received any specific information about the delay. She reported that the casino hadn't requested any verification documents and had stopped responding to her inquiries. The casino later confirmed that the player's verification had been successfully completed. The complaint team had attempted to confirm resolution with the player, but hadn't received any response, leading to the complaint being rejected.

The player from India had issues with account verification. Despite having sent all necessary documents for verification on December 20, 2023, she hadn't received a response and the account hadn't been verified. After her complaint was submitted, the Complaints Team had reached out to the casino for clarification. The casino confirmed that the verification and withdrawal of funds from the player's account had been successful. The player later confirmed that she had received her withdrawal. The issue had been resolved successfully.

The player from Brazil had been attempting to make a withdrawal for 3 days, but it was constantly rejected by the casino. Despite having submitted all requested documents, the casino remained unresponsive and made the verification process difficult. After the player contacted the Complaints Team, they reached out to the casino to clarify the issue. The casino responded, citing technical problems with their providers as the reason for the delay and confirmed that the withdrawal had been paid. They also offered a bonus of 500 reals for the Aviator game as compensation. The player confirmed that his account had been verified, withdrawal was paid, and he was able to play with the bonus. We marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

An Indian player had unresolved winnings from the casino. The player had placed a bet in a live casino game and won, but the winning amount was not credited to his account. He had contacted the casino and was told it was due to a technical glitch and the money would be credited within 24 hours, but it was not. The issue was escalated to the complaints team who contacted the casino representative. The casino acknowledged the issue and corrected it by returning the winning amount to the player's balance. The player confirmed receiving the money and requested the complaint to be closed. The complaint was successfully resolved.

The fully verified player from India is dealing with a recurring issue of decreased withdrawal limits from the same casino. Despite contacting support two months ago about removing withdrawal restrictions and assurances from them, the issue remains unresolved. The casino stated that the player had already withdrawn their winnings and that there were no limitations in place. The player contested this, but while we were waiting for further information from the casino the player played and lost the rest of their balance. The player then requested that the casino close their account. As the player's account was closed and there were no longer any funds being held by the casino, the complaint was eventually rejected.

The player from India had submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings hadn't been obtained up to that day. The player had complained about the casino not verifying his account, which had caused a delay in his withdrawal process. He had provided all the requested documents for verification but the casino was slow in responding. After a prolonged verification process, the casino finally acknowledged all his documents. The player had expressed frustration over the lengthy process and the casino's lack of clear timelines. Eventually, the player confirmed that he had received his withdrawal. We considered the complaint resolved following the successful withdrawal.

The player from Spain had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Her money hadn't been received yet. After reaching out to the casino, it was discovered that the delay might have been due to unfinished KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests. The casino had asked the player to provide additional documents for verification. However, the player did not respond to further inquiries from the complaints team, which led to the complaint being rejected.

The player from India did not receive their offer for free spins at the beginning of the month as promised. The casino credited the spins on the 9th day of the month, but they have now expired due to the delay, and the player's queries are not being answered. The complaint was rejected as the player was still able to use the free spins even if they arrived with a delay and his current balance was all lost within the casino.

The player from Brazil had her account in the casino blocked and her balance was confiscated. After a very long and exhausting discussion with different casino representatives, the casino later reconsidered its original decision and decided to pay out all the remaining balance including the winning from the bonus. The player confirmed that the disputed funds were successfully paid out after more than 3 months. The complaint is resolved.

The player from India requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The male player's account was blocked for an unknown reason. Since we did not receive any response from the casino, we were forced to close this complaint as 'unresolved'. The player claimed he had only one account, but the casino alleged multiple accounts and provided evidence of rule violations. Despite repeated attempts to contact the player for further clarification, no response was received. Therefore, the complaint was rejected.

The player from India had had an issue with a delayed second withdrawal from an online casino. He had previously successfully withdrawn winnings, but his second request had not been processed after 24 hours, which had caused him concern. The player had also reported being unable to access his account and withdrawal history. Despite our team's efforts to assist him and contact the casino, no response had been received from the casino. The player had been advised to contact the Curacao Gaming Authority for further assistance. The case had initially been closed as unresolved due to lack of casino's cooperation. However, it had been reopened later when the casino claimed that all the player's withdrawals had been successfully processed. Due to the lack of confirmation from the player, the complaint had eventually been rejected, but could be reopened at any time.

The player from India has requested a withdrawal one day prior to submitting this complaint. Simply, winnings haven’t been received yet. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from India had raised a complaint regarding a withdrawal issue with an online casino. He had claimed that his withdrawal request had been kept pending by the casino and he was only allowed to withdraw €13 a day. The player had submitted all necessary documents for account verification and had still been awaiting the casino's confirmation after 12 days. The casino eventually claimed that all the player's withdrawals had been paid out in full. However, without confirmation from the player, the Complaints Team was forced to reject the complaint.

The player from India had his winnings voided and his account closed because one of his friends created an account from his device. The casino refused to provide evidence to prove that the decision was based on facts suggesting that the player or players gained or could have gained an unfair advantage. Since the casino also refused to reconsider its decision in this case, the case was closed as 'Unresolved - uncertain case.' The player’s account remained blocked despite multiple attempts to resolve the situation, and the casino’s lack of cooperation led us to close the complaint as unresolved. The casino had reached out with a reopen request, stating that the player's account should be accessible now. The player did not respond to our follow-up questions, forcing us to reject this complaint.