Dear Petronela,
Thank you for your message.
I appreciate the transparency and openness of our correspondence.
To my great regret, the arguments you provided appear contradictory from my point of view.
In your messages, you are taking the side of the casino and once again disregarding the Client’s arguments.
There is only one question to which I have been unable to receive an answer for over a month:
On what grounds was the Verification requested?
I accept that players must provide accurate personal details, but it is also the casino’s obligation to ensure a transparent and correct registration process. If there was any technical error during registration (for example, autofill or saving incorrect data), it is very difficult for a player to immediately notice this. In my case, it cannot be stated with certainty that the error was intentional and solely on my side.
Why should I re-check my personal details if I initially provide them correctly?
Why should I re-check my personal details if I am submitting a copy of my passport?
What doubts did Verde Casino have after just one gaming session?
On what were their doubts based?
At what stage could an error or a technical malfunction of the site have occurred?
How did Verde Casino know, even before KYC Verification, that the date of birth did not match?
I am not disputing the right of the casino to request verification. However, the fact that the casino raised this issue only after I had already made a deposit, played, and requested a withdrawal of my own funds below the threshold for mandatory KYC Verification and submission of personal documents, creates the impression that Verde Casino applies the KYC process selectively in its own interests — in a non-transparent and unfair manner. Responsible operators, for the sake of their reputation, detect data inconsistencies immediately upon registration or deposit, not after accepting KYC documents.
After my withdrawal request, Verde Casino, already being aware of the site error, deliberately requested an unlawful KYC Verification in order to avoid paying out funds.
The offer to restore access to my account only on the condition that I agree to forfeit my balance is unfair and unacceptable. It gives the impression that Verde Casino simply exploits the imperfections of its system, knowing in advance about possible issues, as a pretext to withhold winnings. If Verde Casino truly believes that the only problem was with the date of birth, then my balance should not be affected.
For these reasons, I kindly ask you to continue reviewing my case and to resolve this matter fairly, taking into account both the Client’s interests and Verde Casino’s reputation.
Otherwise, I will post on the forum a copy of the complaint addressed to Verde Casino’s license holder.
Thank you in advance for your time, support, understanding, and professionalism.
Best regards,
Alexander
Dear Petronela,
Thank you for your message.
I appreciate the transparency and openness of our correspondence.
To my great regret, the arguments you provided appear contradictory from my point of view.
In your messages, you are taking the side of the casino and once again disregarding the Client’s arguments.
There is only one question to which I have been unable to receive an answer for over a month:
On what grounds was the Verification requested?
I accept that players must provide accurate personal details, but it is also the casino’s obligation to ensure a transparent and correct registration process. If there was any technical error during registration (for example, autofill or saving incorrect data), it is very difficult for a player to immediately notice this. In my case, it cannot be stated with certainty that the error was intentional and solely on my side.
Why should I re-check my personal details if I initially provide them correctly?
Why should I re-check my personal details if I am submitting a copy of my passport?
What doubts did Verde Casino have after just one gaming session?
On what were their doubts based?
At what stage could an error or a technical malfunction of the site have occurred?
How did Verde Casino know, even before KYC Verification, that the date of birth did not match?
I am not disputing the right of the casino to request verification. However, the fact that the casino raised this issue only after I had already made a deposit, played, and requested a withdrawal of my own funds below the threshold for mandatory KYC Verification and submission of personal documents, creates the impression that Verde Casino applies the KYC process selectively in its own interests — in a non-transparent and unfair manner. Responsible operators, for the sake of their reputation, detect data inconsistencies immediately upon registration or deposit, not after accepting KYC documents.
After my withdrawal request, Verde Casino, already being aware of the site error, deliberately requested an unlawful KYC Verification in order to avoid paying out funds.
The offer to restore access to my account only on the condition that I agree to forfeit my balance is unfair and unacceptable. It gives the impression that Verde Casino simply exploits the imperfections of its system, knowing in advance about possible issues, as a pretext to withhold winnings. If Verde Casino truly believes that the only problem was with the date of birth, then my balance should not be affected.
For these reasons, I kindly ask you to continue reviewing my case and to resolve this matter fairly, taking into account both the Client’s interests and Verde Casino’s reputation.
Otherwise, I will post on the forum a copy of the complaint addressed to Verde Casino’s license holder.
Thank you in advance for your time, support, understanding, and professionalism.
Best regards,
Alexander