PNXBet Casino Review

The player from the Philippines tried to request a withdrawal. The casino asked the player to submit documents for verification and later blocked his account. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Philippines had their account blocked without further explanation. The remaining balance is still held by the casino. The casino failed to respond and we were forced to close this complaint as 'unresolved'.

The player's account has been closed by the casino with remaning balance on it. The casino accused the player of making opposite bets, however they were not able to provide us with any relevant evidence and stopped responding to our questions and messages. We were forced to close the complaint as 'unresolved'.

The player from the Philippines had been accused of fraudulent activity. The casino blocked his account after requesting a withdrawal. The player was informed that this was due to a breach of the rule 2.6.8 and that his account would remain blocked for a minimum of 45 days to allow the casino to review it. One week later, the player's account review period was concluded and the player's access to his account was fully restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from Philippines had his account blocked without further explanation. Later, it became clear that the blocking was only temporary. The casino informed us the player's account had been blocked in accordance with term 2.6.8, indicating the player had been accused of conducting opposite betting activities with the intentional result to fraudulently gain affiliate commission, agent commission, voucher scratch card or any given bonus/commission. The casino did not prove the accusation, however, the player's access to his account and funds was later restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from Philippines had his account blocked without further explanation. The remaining balance is still held by the casino. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Philippines had been accused of opening duplicate accounts. Admittedly, he had opened two different accounts. The casino instructed the player to contact them 45 days later for an update. The complaint was closed as 'rejected' because the player had stopped responding to our messages and questions.

The player from Philippines had his account blocked without further explanation. Later, it became clear that the blocking was only temporary. The casino informed us the player's account had been blocked in accordance with term 2.6.8, indicating the player had been accused of conducting opposite betting activities with the intentional result to fraudulently gain affiliate commission, agent commission, voucher scratch card or any given bonus/commission. The casino did not prove the accusation, however, the player's access to his account and funds was later restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from South Korea had her account blocked for an audit after accumulating a substantial win. Later, it became clear the blocking was only temporary. The player's account was blocked due to being accused of conducting opposite betting to gain affiliate commission. The casino failed to prove these accusations, however, the player's access to her account as well as her funds was later restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from the Philippines has been blocked after requesting a withdrawal. Later, it became clear the blocking was only temporary. The player's account was blocked due to being accused of conducting opposite betting to gain affiliate commission. The casino failed to prove these accusations, however, the player's access to her account as well as her funds was later restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from the Philippines was blocked after requesting a withdrawal. Later, it became clear that the blocking was only temporary. The casino informed us the player's account had been blocked in accordance with term 2.6.8, indicating the player had been accused of conducting opposite betting activities with the intentional result to fraudulently gain affiliate commission, agent commission, voucher scratch card or any given bonus/commission. The casino did not prove the accusation, however, the player's access to his account and funds was later restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from Philippines had their account blocked without further explanation. Later, it became clear that the blocking was only temporary. The casino informed us the player's account had been blocked in accordance with term 2.6.8, indicating the player had been accused of conducting opposite betting activities with the intentional result to fraudulently gain affiliate commission, agent commission, voucher scratch card or any given bonus/commission. The complaint was later rejected because the player had stopped responding to our messages and questions.

The player from Philippines had their account blocked without further explanation. Later, it became clear the blocking was only temporary. The player's account was blocked due to being accused of conducting opposite betting to gain affiliate commission. The casino failed to prove the accusation, however, the player's access to his account and funds was later restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.

The player from Philippines had his account blocked for an audit after accumulating a substantial win. Later, it became clear the blocking was only temporary. The player's account was blocked due to being accused of conducting opposite betting to gain affiliate commission. The casino failed to prove this, however, the player's access to his account and funds was later restored. The complaint was closed as 'resolved'.