PariPesa Casino Review

The player from India submitted a withdrawal request of 9000 INR but had not received the funds. Despite showing a bank statement to the casino, they claimed the withdrawal had been processed. The issue was resolved after the player confirmed that the casino had granted the withdrawal. The Complaints Team marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Spain had made a successful deposit of 300 USDT via crypto, but the funds were never credited to her account. After acknowledging the issue, the casino had promised a refund minus a 10% fee, but two months later, they had not issued the refund or responded to her emails. Despite repeated attempts to contact the casino, no response was received, leading the Complaints Team to mark the complaint as 'unresolved'. The player was advised to reach out to the Curaçao Gaming Control Board for further assistance.

The player from Spain faced a limitation on daily withdrawals to 109 euros at Paripesa without explanation. Despite having previously made successful larger withdrawals, the casino attributed the restriction to supposed technical issues. The Complaints Team attempted to gather more information by requesting evidence and updates from the player. However, due to the player's lack of response, the complaint was unable to be investigated further and was consequently rejected.

The player from Germany had deposited 50 euros at Paripesa Casino over a week ago but was unable to withdraw the funds as the casino was still investigating the issue. The Complaints Team had extended the investigation period but ultimately had to reject the complaint due to the player's lack of response to follow-up messages.

The player from Italy experienced significant delays with multiple withdrawals from the Paripesa site, including a previously approved transfer on the 28th that remained unpaid. Despite making four withdrawals of €500 each, totaling €2,300.65, the casino claimed they were approved, but the funds had not been received. The issue was resolved as the player confirmed that all winnings had been successfully returned. The Complaints Team marked the complaint as resolved and offered further assistance if needed in the future.

The player from Brazil struggled to withdraw funds for months despite having submitted all requested documents, which were clear and in their name. The casino continued to provide excuses for not processing the withdrawal. The Complaints Team attempted to mediate by requesting further information from the casino and extending the response time. However, due to the lack of communication from the casino, the complaint was closed as 'unresolved', which may have negatively impacted the casino's rating.

The player from Argentina made a deposit using Astropay but was unable to withdraw funds as the option was not available. Attempts to withdraw via crypto also failed, leaving the player unable to access their money. The issue was resolved when the casino instructed the player to make another deposit using crypto in order to facilitate withdrawals through that method.

The player from Portugal had been registered with Papesa casino since March 31, 2023, and had previously made withdrawals without issues. At that time, after winning 5000€, he faced a restriction that limited his daily withdrawals to 100€, despite having previously withdrawn larger amounts. The complaint was rejected due to the player's lack of response to inquiries from the Complaints Team, which prevented further investigation into the issue.

The player from Guatemala was unable to withdraw money from the casino because he had not received the confirmation SMS on his phone. Despite multiple attempts to register the phone number, the casino had not provided an alternative way to secure the withdrawal. We had asked the player to provide communication with the casino and attempted to mediate by inviting the casino to offer a different solution. The casino had directed the player to their Telegram support, which did not resolve the issue. Due to the player's cessation of communication, the complaint was rejected. Later, the complaint was reopened at the player's request, but the casino failed to respond, leading to the complaint being closed as 'unresolved.'

The player from India had requested a withdrawal of Rs 8,000 from PariPesa, which remained unfulfilled for more than 24 hours. The player also reported being unable to log in due to an unrequested block for addiction. The player denied requesting self-exclusion from PariPesa but admitted to self-excluding from other casinos in the past. However, the issue was successfully resolved, confirmed by the player, which led us to close the complaint.

The player from Spain, who had won over €500, encountered issues with the casino's verification process. He had been asked to provide additional documentation, including utility bills and a bank document, for security purposes. However, the player did not have the requested invoices and had reported inconsistent information from the casino's customer service regarding the validity of the documents. After several exchanges, the player had been able to propose alternative documents which the casino accepted. Despite the slow process, the player was finally successful in withdrawing his winnings. The complaint had been resolved and was subsequently closed.

A player from Spain requested a €500 withdrawal, which was initially accepted. However, minutes later, the player's account was blocked due to an alleged self-exclusion that the player did not request. The casino is no longer responding to the player's enquiries, leaving €50 still in the account. The complaint was resolved as the player received his money from the casino.

The player from Italy had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks before he submitted this complaint. His money hadn't been received at that time. The Complaints Team had explained that it often took up to 14 days for withdrawals to be processed and might have been delayed due to unfinished KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests. They had advised the player to remain patient and cooperate fully with the casino. After a while, the player confirmed that he had finally received his withdrawal. The Complaints Team then marked the complaint as 'resolved'.

The player from Spain had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, his payout hadn't been received. The Complaints Team had reached out to the casino for clarification and discovered that the player had used a different payment method for withdrawal than for his deposit, which left his withdrawal pending. The player had been advised to withdraw using the same method as his deposit and he was eventually able to withdraw his winnings.

The player requested a withdrawal at PariPesa Casino 10 days prior to submitting complaint, but the money never arrived to their account. It is unknown whether the payout had been processed by the casino since the player received no information regarding their issue. The casino didn't react to the complaint, therefore, it remained unresolved.

According to the player, they deposited $26 via Coinbase to their casino account at PariPesa, but the money wasn't credited to their balance. Despite trying to get assistance from the casino support, the player's issue remained unfixed. The casino didn't respond to the complaint, so it was closed as unresolved.

The player claimed they had issues withdrawing their funds at PariPesa Casino. They requested to withdraw $2.675 via Tether, but it wasn't processed. According to the player, they had successfully passed the KYC before, and the casino support informed them about working on the issue, however, it wasn't resolved. There was no reaction to the complaint from the casino.

The player experienced issue with access to their account at PariPesa Casino. When they submitted withdrawal request, the SMS code was supposed to come to their mobile phone number, but the player didn't receive anything and decided to update the phone number. However, no SMS code came to that number either. Then the player logged out of their account but wasn't able to log back in after that. Despite several attempts to contact the casino support, they received no assistance. The complaint remained unresolved because the casino didn't react to it.

The player claimed to have made a deposit to their account at PariPesa Casino, however, the money wasn't credited to their balance. The player tried to communicate with the casino support but received no help. The casino didn't react to the complaint.

A player from Spain is awaiting two withdrawals of 200 and 213 euros from an online casino. The casino provides a standard response, stating they're awaiting confirmation from the operator, but the funds have yet to arrive. The complaint was closed as the player stopped responding.

The player from Portugal requested a self-exclusion from the casino, yet the account remains open and the chat support has not provided any answers. The player did not respond to our questions and comments, so we had to reject the complaint.

The player from Spain is struggling to withdraw €2,000 from their casino account after previously being able to successfully make three withdrawals. They are constantly told there are technical issues and they also have concerns about the casino's operating license. Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player complained they had deposited via bitcoin to the transaction address displayed in the casino, but it was never credited to their casino account. After some time, the casino support told them it hadn't been sent to the right address. As the casino never reacted to this complaint, we don't know what was the outcome of this issue.

The player from Italy has requested several withdrawals five days prior to submitting this complaint. Simply, winnings haven’t been received yet. We rejected the complaint because the player played their balance down to zero.

The player from Germany started playing with a bonus, but then he received an error message and he couldn't continue. We ended up closing the complaint as ‘unresolved’ because the casino failed to reply.

The player from Italy has been trying to close the account due to a gambling problem. Unfortunately, all the enquiries were ignored. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.