Mr. O Casino Review

The player from Pennsylvania is experiencing difficulties with a withdrawal from the casino. Despite numerous deposits, the casino confiscated her winnings because she reportedly failed to make a deposit within the last 12 bonuses, all of which were no deposit free spins.

The player from Canada used several consecutive coupons on Mr. O without making a deposit. The casino, despite having accepted the coupons, now refuses to pay out the winnings and have restricted the player's access to coupons. They have also confiscated the player's winnings.

The player from the United States had reported an inability to withdraw her winnings from Mr. O Casino, despite having completed the playthrough and made a deposit. She had experienced issues with CashApp and switched to using Bitcoin, but was informed that the sender hadn't paid sufficient fees. Even after the funds had been returned to her account, her withdrawal attempts were continually denied, and she was eventually blocked from the casino. After communication with the Complaints Team, the player confirmed that the casino had paid her and the issue had been resolved successfully.

The player from Oregon had faced a withdrawal issue due to the casino's claim of multiple accounts under the same IP address. The player had denied having multiple accounts. After the player contacted the casino, his account was verified for withdrawal and the casino offered him additional no-deposit bonuses. Since the player didn't clarify our questions, we couldn't consider the issue resolved and was instead closed as rejected.

The player from Florida had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting her complaint. Her money had not been received yet. She had played on a bonus and met all the wagering requirements. The casino had requested an additional deposit of $10, which she had made. However, her withdrawal was rejected by her bank. Communication with the casino led to no resolution. The casino claimed to have sent the winnings to the player's crypto address, but the player stated she hadn't received it. The Complaints Team had attempted to mediate the situation, but without confirmation from the player on the receipt of her winnings, the complaint had been rejected.

The player from Alabama had contested the casino's claim that he had used a bonus code multiple times from the same IP. Despite this, he had been refused a $50 payout after playing by the rules and submitting the necessary documents. The player had been asked for additional information and documents to verify his account. However, he did not respond to the requests for further details. As a result, we were unable to proceed with the investigation and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Colorado is dealing with persistent technical issues at a new online casino. The screen frequently malfunctions or shuts down during games, interfering with the player's chances to win. They are considering exploring other platforms and seeking a refund. The complaint was rejected as the player was not eligible for a refund.