Lucky Tiger Casino Review

The player from Finland is experiencing difficulties withdrawing his winnings due to ongoing verification. Unfortunately, the player lost his winnings before we could help, therefore, we were forced to reject this complaint.

The player's verification was delayed as the casino keept requesting new documents. We contacted the casino and were informed that the verification procedure was finally completed. The player confirmed this and stated that they received their winnings, so we closed the complaint as resolved.

The player from Virginia has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from South Africa is complaining about the lengthy verification process. The player had their bonus winnings voided due to breaching the Bonus T&Cs by placing multiple bets exceeding the maximum allowed bet. The casino team has provided sufficient evidence proving their decision in this case was justified. We rejected the player's complaint as 'Unjustified'.

The player from Bosnia and Herzegovina has submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Portugal accumulated winnings with a bonus that had a maximum cashout limit. They continued playing and accumulated a more significant amount of winnings. However, the casino reduced them because the bonus was still active.

The player from Australia requested a withdrawal and, after approximately 4 weeks of waiting for payment, she decided to make a complaint. After creating a Bitcoin wallet, the player received a payment in a few days, approximately 5 weeks after the withdrawal request. The complaint is resolved.

The player from Canada had been waiting for his withdrawal since November. After the casino's statement that the player were provided with the detailed explanation of how the transactions should be reflected on the card statement, and with the confirmation that the withdrawals were processed, the player stopped responding. The complaint was rejected.

The player from United States has requested a withdrawal. Unfortunately, the payment seems to be delayed. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions. We’ve reopened this complaint as per the player’s request. The complaint was successfully resolved.

The player from United States had her account blocked after an alleged chargeback in a different casino. The casino later informed us that the issue regarding the accusation of a performing a chargeback in a different casino has been resolved. The casino requested the player to provide additional documents to verify her identity. The player followed the casino's instructions and later informed us that the issue had been successfully resolved.

The player from United States has been accused of breaching bonus terms by placing single bets greater than the allowed ones. After a closer examination, we ended up rejecting this complaint as unjustified.

The player from Australia has tried to block the account due to a gambling problem. Unfortunately, the enquiry was ignored. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from United States had their bonus winnings cancelled. We’ve reopened this complaint as per the player’s request. We rejected the complaint again because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the US had requested a withdrawal of a substantial amount, but the casino informed them that their withdrawal will be processed in installments. The complaint was resolved. The casino stated the player's following withdrawals would be paid in full according to the daily withdrawal limits.

The player from United States submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings haven’t been obtained up to this day. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player was struggling to verify as the casino kept requesting new documents. The casino responded to the complaint and stated that the player's account had now been approved for withdrawals. The player was waiting for their withdrawal but could suddenly no longer access the site. However, after some time, the player received their payment and the issue was resolved.

The player from United States requested a check of his bonus game as he’s not sure if the maximum bet rule hasn’t been breached. After the casino's entry into the complaint's thread, the issue was resolved.

The player from the United Kingdom has requested a withdrawal 2 weeks ago. It has been pending since. The player informed us, he received all of his funds, therefore we closed this complaint as resolved.

The player from the US is experiencing difficulties requesting a withdrawal from the casino. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from the United States experienced reduced payouts on his winnings from Shazam Casino, despite initially receiving withdrawals within a week. Shazam Casino had lowered his withdrawals from $2,000 to $1,000 for the first attempt, and to $200 for the second attempt, leaving $8,820 still in his account, with comp points no longer accumulating. The player suspected he was being slow-paid due to being classified as a winning player and sought adherence to the advertised withdrawal limits. The Complaints Team intervened and communicated with Shazam Casino, which confirmed the player's withdrawal limits but agreed to process payments according to standard weekly amounts. Following this, the player successfully received his withdrawals of $2,000 as expected, and the case was marked as resolved. The player was encouraged to reach out if any further issues arose.

The player from Texas had a pending withdrawal since July 17 after playing a bonus. However, the casino claimed the player bet $35 on a game which the player refutes, insisting their bet was only $1 per spin. The player awaited proof. The casino informed us that after a detailed investigation on its side, it reconsidered its original decision since the maximum bet amount rule was not breached. An in-game feature was displayed in the complainant's game history as one transaction exceeding the maximum bet amount, which was incorrect. The casino paid out the disputed winnings in less than 1 week after they commented on the thread. The complaint is resolved.

The player from US requested a withdrawal 2 weeks prior to submitting this complaint. It has not been processed yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from the US was struggling to withdraw her winnings. One of the withdrawal requests had been pending for a long time to be processed. After the player's confirmation, the complaint is considered resolved.

The player Australia is not able to make a deposit using a Visa card. The player decided to use a different deposit method, and with help from the casino's support she managed to make a successful Bitcoin deposit. Therefore we marked the complaint as resolved.