Jungliwin Casino Review

The player from the Netherlands was unable to complete the verification process required for the withdrawal of €1520 at JungliWin. The casino kept advising to cancel the withdrawal to prompt verification, but this prompt never occurred, resulting in a stagnant loop. The player had been asked to forward recent communication with the casino regarding the issue for better understanding. However, despite extending the response time, the player did not respond to our queries. Consequently, we were unable to investigate further and had rejected the complaint.

The player from the Netherlands requested a withdrawal of 7500 EUR from Jungliwin.com, but it was denied without explanation from the casino. The player tried to follow the KYC procedure, but couldn't submit documents on the casino website. The player later confirmed the issue was resolved.

The player from India initiated a deposit of 5,000rs via payment provider UPI. Although the player has evidence of a successful transaction, the payment provider claims not to have received the deposit. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

A player from Brazil requested a withdrawal of 996€ from Jungliwin more than two weeks ago. However, despite frequent communications with the casino, the payment is delayed for the reason cited as issues with their Bitcoin provider. We closed the complaint because the player stopped responding.

The player from Brazil has a withdrawal issue with Jungliwin Casino who claims she has duplicate accounts. Her account was blocked and her withdrawal of €1463 was obstructed. From this amount, she received only €298 and €1160 is still unreleased. After our intervention, we were able to help the player to get their winnings. The player confirmed they received the funds in the end. The Player’s complaint has been resolved successfully.

The player from Germany deposited 500 Euros into Jungliwin and won some money. However, Jungliwin blocked the player's account without providing a clear explanation for the decision. The casino has refrained from sharing the exact account balance and the payout has been refused. We were forced to reject this complaint because the player focused only on sports betting.

A player from Germany is waiting for their payout for more than 48 hours, and always receives the same response from the VIP manager: to wait. We rejected the complaint because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

Both the player and the casino team have submitted compelling evidence, leaving the resolution unclear. The both sides The player has agreed to reach out to the licensing authority, and as a result, the case is being closed temporarily with the status "Waiting For Regulator." The resolution will be updated once a decision is made by the regulator.

The player from India requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. The payment hasn’t been processed yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from the Netherlands requests a return of his deposits due to the casino not processing his self-exclusion requests. Unfortunately, the player didn't provide the evidence the casino knew about his gambling problems. We couldn't proceed without this essential evidence, therefore we were forced to close the complaint.

The player from the Netherlands is asking for a deposit refund because of registration in the Dutch register for players with gambling addiction. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player deposited money into his account, but the funds were lost. The casino informed us that the deposit in question was credited to the player's account approximately 3 weeks after the deposit had been made and that the delay may have been due to the volume of transactions. We consider the complaint resolved.

The player from Sweden had faced difficulties withdrawing his winnings from Lalabet Casino, despite initial assurances from a VIP agent that the process would be completed within 48 hours. He had also expressed concerns about the absence of a KYC system at the casino. The player had confirmed that he used his own funds, not a bonus, to accumulate his winnings. After several discussions with the casino, the player had received his money and requested the case to be closed. We had marked the complaint as resolved in our system.

The player from Germany had requested self-exclusion from Lalabet for 24 hours, after being promised a cashback of €326 which she intended to withdraw. Despite the VIP manager's assurance of account reactivation, her account had remained closed due to an alleged gambling addiction, preventing her from accessing the cashback. The player also claimed that the casino had ignored her previous self-exclusion request, leading to further deposits and losses. After our intervention, the player confirmed that she received the promised cashback, leading to the resolution of the issue.

The player from Brazil had had 2207 BRL stuck in his profile after a withdrawal request had been returned to his account balance. The casino had stated that his previous payment method, Pay4fun, was unavailable and had suggested using Astropay after making a deposit with it. The player had also attempted to withdraw via PIX but had encountered an error. After several attempts, the player had successfully withdrawn his winnings via PIX. The issue had been resolved.

The player from the Netherlands had faced an issue with a delayed withdrawal of 2500€ from the online casino. The player had been advised to wait for at least 14 days for the withdrawal process to be completed. After waiting, the player confirmed that the withdrawal was approved and he had received his money. Consequently, we marked the complaint as 'resolved' in our system.

The player from the Netherlands requested a refund from Lala.bet Casino on 18th September. Despite successfully completing the KYC verification and providing the necessary documents, the player has not received their refund yet, and the support agent couldn't confirm if the transfer was made. The complaint was resolved as the player received his refund.

The player from Belgium deposited €100 into LalaBet Casino more than a week ago, but the amount has not been credited to his account yet. Despite providing all required evidence and confirmation from Lunu - the crypto transactions provider, that the transaction was successful, the casino maintains that the transaction is still pending. The player later confirmed that the deposit was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Brazil has been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, their payout hasn’t been received yet. The player later confirmed that the withdrawal was processed successfully, therefore we marked this complaint as resolved.

The player from Lower Saxony claims their winnings were restricted to €50, despite no specific maximum win limit being stated in the bonus rules. The casino's main rules suggest a maximum win of ten times the bonus, which would equal to either €200 or €216.90. The player is seeking the remaining balance of €150 or €161.90. After the casino provided information that the bonus was subject to specific terms and conditions, we closed the complaint as resolved once the player confirmed receipt of the payment.

A player from the Netherlands spent significant time gambling on Lalabet casino, winning amounts ultimately totaling approximately €30,000. He successfully withdrew €7,500 but subsequent withdrawal attempts resulted in verification requests. Despite having completed the verification process, and the assignment of a VIP manager, his account has been closed. The player noticed that Dutch players are not allowed on the website, despite him having played and received winnings. The complaint was resolved as the player got paid out.