Juicy Vegas Casino Review

The player from Croatia had reported a problem with his $100 win at an online casino. He had completed the necessary withdrawal requirements including ID and face verification and a $20 deposit. Despite this, his withdrawal was not processed and he was asked to deposit more money by the casino's agents. We had contacted the casino to clarify the issue, but received no response. As a result, we had to close the complaint as 'unresolved'.

The player from Armenia had utilized a promo code, followed all stipulations, and achieved a balance of 136 USD. After attempting account verification and requesting withdrawal, the player had lost access to her account and was informed that her country was not supported. The player's account was initially unblocked, but was later blocked again due to allegations of multiple accounts. Despite the player's confirmation of passing KYC verification and not using a VPN, the casino did not cooperate in resolving the issue. Consequently, we had marked the complaint as 'unresolved'. This could have negatively affected the casino's rating and may have prompted them to change their approach.

The player from Armenia successfully won back funds from a no-deposit code and requested a withdrawal. The casino requested verification documents and a symbolic deposit but then claimed they were unable to make a transfer to Armenia. The casino then requested an alternative withdrawal method via Bitcoin, followed by an additional deposit.

The player from Sri Lanka had won $100 with a no deposit bonus and had requested a withdrawal. The casino had asked for additional documentation, including a birth certificate, before processing the second withdrawal. However, his account was suddenly blocked due to a "management decision", despite having been verified. Questions had arisen regarding the repeated verification and sudden account closure. Upon reviewing the documents the player had provided, we found them to potentially be inauthentic. As a result, we concluded that the casino had acted appropriately in closing the account and we rejected the player's complaint.

The player from Sri Lanka requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Their money hasn’t been received yet. The complaint was rejected because the player didn't respond to our messages and questions.

The player from Sri Lanka deposited $999 at the casino 10 days ago but faced difficulties regarding the transfer and a lack of communication. The casino eventually blocked her account without any notification and failed to provide an explanation or address the player's deposit concerns. The player stopped responding to our questions and comments, so after 2 weeks, we rejected the complaint.

The player from Sri Lanka made a deposit, but it has not been credited to his account. After investigating the issue in more detail, we found out that the player made the deposit from his Binance account and that he mixed up the hashes of the transactions which caused the confusion. Unfortunately, we ended up closing the complaint as unresolved because the casino stopped responding.

The player struggles to withdraw his money due to ongoing verification. Even though we assumed that the issue had been resolved, without a confirmation from the player, we were forced to reject this complaint.

A player from Sri Lanka has deposited in the casino, but the amount has not been credited to his casino account. The player received a deposit but violated the no-deposit rule, and multiple accounts were used on the same IP address as the player's IP. The complaint was closed as "rejected".