Gamblemax Casino Review

The player from the United States had been waiting for over a month for her pending withdrawal to be approved. The Complaints Team sought to clarify her situation by asking about her KYC verification status and the details of her bonus offer. However, despite extending the response time, the player did not provide the necessary information. As a result, we were unable to further investigate and had to reject the complaint.

The player from Arizona had fulfilled all withdrawal requirements and had been waiting for her withdrawal for six weeks. Despite referrals and multiple attempts to contact the casino, there was a lack of response. Our team had tried to mediate the situation and invited the casino to respond. However, the casino ignored our attempts and failed to reply within the set time frame. As a result, we closed the complaint as 'unresolved', which negatively affected the casino's rating. Unfortunately, the casino was unlicensed, limiting further action.

The player from Georgia had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting the complaint. The payment hadn’t been processed yet. Despite the player's attempts to communicate with the casino, there was no response. The casino also requested an additional deposit from the player, which she refused. We had attempted to intervene, inviting the casino to participate in the conversation, but received no response. After repeated attempts to contact the casino, we concluded that without cooperation from the casino, the issue could not be resolved. The complaint was marked as 'unresolved' in our system, which could have negatively affected the casino's rating.

The player from Iowa had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, his winnings hadn't been received yet. The Complaints Team had advised the player to wait at least 14 days after requesting the withdrawal, as delays could have been caused by unfinished KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests. The player was unresponsive to further inquiries from the Complaints Team, which led to the complaint being rejected due to a lack of information.

The player from Florida had submitted a withdrawal request less than two weeks prior to contacting us. Winnings had not been obtained up to that day. The player confirmed she had met all withdrawal requirements and had not made any successful withdrawals before. The withdrawal request remained pending after almost a month. We had attempted to contact the casino multiple times but received no response. As the casino operated without a valid license and didn't refer to any Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) service, there was no gaming authority to address. The complaint was marked as 'unresolved', which may have negatively affected the casino's rating.

The player from the USA had deposited $50 to withdraw initial winnings and was then informed that she needed 10 people to sign up before she could withdraw. She had confirmed that her account was verified and it was her first bonus. We had suggested that if her deposited $50 was still available in her account, she could potentially cancel the bonus, forfeit the winnings, and use at least the deposited $50. However, due to a lack of response from the player to our messages and questions, we had to reject the case.

The player from Arizona had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting her complaint. The payment hadn't been processed. The player had been asked to deposit additional funds to upgrade her account status, which she didn't do, and her withdrawal remained pending. Despite multiple attempts to contact the casino for resolution, there had been no response. The casino was operating without a valid license, leaving no gaming authority to appeal to. We had marked the complaint as 'unresolved', potentially affecting the casino's rating. We advised the player to consider casino reviews and ratings in the future to avoid such issues.

The player from Minnesota had been waiting over a month for his $10,000 withdrawal. Despite our attempts to mediate, the casino did not respond to our inquiries. Given that the casino was operating without a valid license and didn't refer to any ADR service, we marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which could have negatively affected the casino's rating.

The player from Alabama had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, her winnings hadn't been received yet. This had been her first withdrawal attempt. Despite our team's efforts to resolve the issue by contacting the casino, there had been no response from the casino's side. The casino operated without a valid license and didn't refer to any ADR service, leaving us unable to turn to a gaming authority. As such, we had marked the complaint as 'unresolved', potentially affecting the casino's rating. We had advised the player to choose casinos based on their reviews and ratings in the future to avoid similar situations.

The player from New York had won almost $3000, but after a $50 deposit for verification, he was unable to withdraw his winnings. Despite successful account verification and multiple attempts to contact the casino, the player received no satisfactory response. Our team had attempted to facilitate communication between the player and the casino, but the casino remained unresponsive. We recommended the player to contact the Curaçao Antillephone N.V., the casino's licensing authority, for further assistance. Due to the lack of cooperation from the casino, we marked the complaint as 'unresolved'.

The player from Illinois had requested a withdrawal from an online casino less than two weeks before she submitted her complaint. Despite having passed the KYC verification and met the withdrawal requirements, she hadn't received her winnings. We had attempted to resolve the issue by contacting the casino on multiple occasions, but hadn't received any response. As the casino was operating without a valid license and didn't refer to any ADR service, we were unable to take the matter to a gaming authority. Consequently, we had marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which could have negatively affected the casino's rating. We had advised the player to choose casinos based on their reviews and ratings in the future to avoid such issues.

The player from Iowa had requested a withdrawal less than two weeks prior to submitting this complaint. Despite meeting all bonus terms and playthrough requirements, his withdrawal had not been processed and he had not received his winnings. The player also had several other pending withdrawals and over 100,000 in his casino account. He had been told by the casino that the delay was due to a high volume of withdrawal requests. We had attempted to contact the casino multiple times but received no response. Since the casino operated without a valid license and didn't refer to any ADR service, there was no gaming authority to turn to. The complaint had been marked as 'unresolved'.

The player from Iowa has requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, their winnings haven’t been received yet. After contacting casino and their affiliates we still weren't able to get a response.

The player from Nevada had requested a withdrawal prior to submitting this complaint. Unfortunately, her winnings had not been received yet. The Complaints Team had advised the player that withdrawals could take several days or even weeks to process, possibly due to unfinished KYC verification or a high volume of withdrawal requests. The team had extended the response time by 7 days, but the player did not respond. As a result, we were unable to investigate further and the complaint had been rejected.

The player from Ohio had been waiting for a withdrawal for less than two weeks. Unfortunately, his payout hadn't been received yet. The player confirmed that he hadn't passed any KYC verification as the casino had never asked for it. His winnings were not accumulated with any active bonuses. Despite the efforts of the Complaints Team to resolve the issue, the casino remained unresponsive. The casino was operating without a valid license and didn't refer to any ADR service, leaving no gaming authority to turn to. Therefore, we marked the complaint as 'unresolved', which may have negatively affected the casino's rating.