The 3rd party operators featured on this page are featured on a non-commercial basis with no commission arrangements in place. 21+. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

HomeForumResponsible GamblingSelf-exclusion from all online casinos!

Self-exclusion from all online casinos! (page 6)

61,855 views 122 replies |
3 years ago
|
1...5 6 7
Add post
2 months ago

Every little bit helps, thank you very much.

Automatic translation:
Gioto6969
2 months ago

👍

You are very welcome!

If you want to talk more, please do so. I'll find you here.

Romi
2 months ago

file will commit suicide, because my permanent self exclusion has been ignored by TAP TAP, I have evidence of permanent self exclusion that they ignored. I lost so much. This pain has made me decide to commit suicide.

Rey01
2 months ago

Friend, I hope what you're saying is just a moment of desperation. I understand, unfortunately, what you're going through. Think things through carefully and calmly. Nothing and no one deserves for you to take your own life. I recently had a relapse (I'm a gambling addict) and I'm in a very bad place, but my loved ones aren't to blame. You're worth more than any money you might have lost. Please seek help and be strong. What happened to you has a solution, but what you're threatening to do isn't.

Automatic translation:
Rey01
2 months ago

Hey friend, is everything alright? How are you feeling?

Automatic translation:
2 months ago

file will commit suicide, because my permanent self exclusion has been ignored by TAP TAP, I have evidence of permanent self exclusion that they ignored. I lost so much. This pain has made me decide to commit suicide.

2 months ago

I am really sorry for this situation. Please know that if you feel this way, you should surely reach for help.

Could you do that, please?

Ask anyone, tell them how you feel, don't keep it inside. 🙏

Romi
3 weeks ago

Too bad he's gone.

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

Yes, I hope everything goes well for him.

Automatic translation:
Gioto6969
3 weeks ago

He left a lot of memories, and his phone was not locked at all.

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

Too bad he's gone.

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

You don't joke about things like that, it's not normal in my opinion.

If someone has similar tendencies, they need to seek help, and joking about it on a forum is not appropriate in such cases.

You might want to think about that.

Jaro
3 weeks ago

You didn't handle this matter well. He was a good friend of mine. His life was ruined. You didn't even bring the other parties to the dispute. He had suffered an injustice, and he brought it to you because you were his only hope. He presented evidence, and you simply dismissed the case.

Automatic translation:
Gojosatoru
3 weeks ago

Hello, your post is obviously based on strong emotions. May I instead ask you for facts, please? I for example, have no idea what is going on, but I see you are very concerned.

Can you share the complaint details, please?

I do not want to be mean, but lawyers are more suitable to defend people from injustice. We are mediators.


Radka
3 weeks ago

You didn't call 188Bet/taptap at all. You saw Rey01's conversation in his complaint, where he provided ample evidence. And you keep asking for more evidence, even though he clearly has valid evidence showing he's trying to protect himself from the gambling activities 188bet/taptap is issuing.


You should have called 188bet/taptap to attend instead of closing the complaint, he suffered losses of more than 100,000,000 USD

Automatic translation:
3 weeks ago

file

The casino issued a permanent self-exclusion form on their website. He completed it and received an approval email. However, the casino violated the terms by changing jurisdictions. So, the casino used that as an excuse to allow him to play again. But you asked for proof of the form violation. He has provided the final result in the form of a permanent self-exclusion approval email. But you keep asking for more proof?

Automatic translation:
Radka
3 weeks ago

You should help him get what he deserves by presenting 188bet/taptap.

Instead of closing the case, he had very strong evidence: a verified email from the casino. A player trying to protect himself. He suffered significant losses. When his account was reactivated, it caused him to relapse.


I don't understand why you haven't brought in 188bet/taptap to clarify this issue. He's a player who completed KYC and all the necessary procedures.

Automatic translation:
Gojosatoru
3 weeks ago

Just look at Natalie's last reply. The player simply did not provide what was necessary to continue with the case.

Our team has dealt with thousands of such cases, and we have our own procedures. If the player cannot provide what is necessary, unfortunately, this is the result. 😕

Gojosatoru deleted the post
Jaro
3 weeks ago

The email received is strong evidence that it is an agreement. Don't you understand about evidence?

Automatic translation:
Gojosatoru deleted the post
Jaro
3 weeks ago

You're acting like a judge, not a mediator. Let the casino explain why the problem occurred. Inviting them is the best approach. A mediator needs to present both parties, no matter how small the evidence. You appear to be protecting the casinos.

Automatic translation:
1...5 6 7
Go to pageof 7 pages

Add post

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback

Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more

Subscribe to our newsletter for no deposit bonuses, free tournaments, new slots, and more.