Hello.
First of all, I’m really sorry to hear about the relapse. I can imagine this situation feels frustrating, especially after taking the step to self-exclude in the past. It makes complete sense that you’re now questioning whether more should have been done to stop this from happening.
Just to clarify one important thing, if by "PP" you mean Pragmatic Play, they are only the game provider, not the casino operator. Self-exclusion applies to the casino itself or occasionally an entire casino group, not the slot provider.
Whether your new account should have been flagged depends on where you originally self-excluded and under what system. If it was the same casino or the same casino group, then matching details like your name, date of birth, address, and ID verification should have raised concerns. At the same time, using a different email and phone number can make automatic detection more difficult, and unfortunately many operators still place a lot of responsibility on the player not to create a new account.
That said, self-exclusion is mainly a responsible gambling safeguard, not an automatic refund mechanism. In most cases, casinos are not required to refund deposits simply because a player managed to open a new account, especially if different contact details were used.
Your case would generally be stronger if:
• the self exclusion was for gambling addiction or problem gambling
• it was the same casino
• they had enough matching personal information to reasonably identify you, especially after ID verification, and the platform is not partially anonymous casino
• gambling was still allowed after KYC checks.
If this were a completely unrelated casino, realistically the chances of getting deposits refunded based on the casino's improper actions are, in my opinion, quite low.
So yes, you can still try, but I’d first focus on establishing whether this was actually the same operator or casino group rather than just games from Pragmatic Play.