Hello everyone,
I wanted to share my experience and ask for your feedback on a serious issue I'm having with Revolut, which I think ties in perfectly with this thread about incorrect MCCs and Curaçao licenses.
I have made transactions with a gaming operator that, according to my research, operates unregulated in Spain (its main domain is blocked, although it uses alternative domains that are accessible).
My main problem is the completely contradictory and misleading information that Revolut has provided me:
In the app and from Revolut support: Transactions appeared under categories that did NOT indicate gambling. For example, "non-gambling businesses," "Supermarkets and Food," or "PROFESSIONAL SERVICES." This led me to believe I wasn't making gambling payments.
When I try to dispute payments (with Revolut support): Suddenly, I'm informed that "the card scheme rules (Visa/Mastercard) have classified the transactions as gambling." The worst part is that Revolut support itself admits that the categorization shown in its system (the one I see in the app) "may not accurately reflect this." In other words, they acknowledge that the card scheme has a gambling MCC, but they show me a generic one in the app.
RevPoints contradiction: Revolut has a policy of not awarding RevPoints for gambling transactions. I have verified that I was NOT awarded RevPoints for these transactions. This proves that internally, Revolut DID classify them as gambling from the start, despite being misled by being shown otherwise in the app. When I asked why points weren't added to purchases that "according to you, weren't gambling within Revolut," support was unable to provide a coherent answer.
Inconsistency in blocking: Revolut told me they block certain gambling operators due to "local regulations in Spain." However, they didn't block transactions to this operator (which is illegal in Spain). When I asked why these transactions weren't blocked if they were gambling transactions, support only gave me excuses about the complexity of the blocks.
Additionally, I have found that I had a similar transaction with another bank (ING), which is also categorized generically ("Purchases (other)"), which suggests a broader problem with how financial institutions handle these categorizations.
I have filed an internal complaint with Revolut and am awaiting its resolution, before, if necessary, I can contact the Bank of Spain.
My question is: Do you think, with all this evidence of contradictions and deception on Revolut's part, I have a solid case to demand a refund? Has anyone had similar experiences with Revolut and this dual MCC they use for disputes?
Thank you for your help!