The 3rd party operators featured on this page are featured on a non-commercial basis with no commission arrangements in place. 21+. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER.

HomeForumGeneral Gambling DiscussionQuestion about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code

Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (page 703)

3,662,824 views 19,876 replies |
2 years ago
A little warning here for the CG Community: Casino Guru is an open platform where everyone is free to share their thoughts and opinions. We believe in free speech and try to be as non-restrictive as possible. That said, please remember: just because something is posted on the forum doesn’t mean Casino Guru agrees with it or endorses it in any way. We’re really happy to see players engaging in conversations, debating respectfully, and having fun doing so! That’s why we created this platform. However, we’ve noticed a growing trend – not just here, but across other platforms too – where some players, after losing money fairly in a casino, look for ways to get those funds back through their bank or payment provider, often by filing chargebacks or making false claims. We’d like to warn you: this behaviour is not only unfair – it’s also very risky! We’ve already seen and heard stories (here and elsewhere) of people who got into serious trouble trying to go down this route – including closed casino accounts across multiple platforms, closed bank accounts, debts, and even lawsuits (attempted fraud). Attempting fraud or misrepresenting the truth to a bank or provider is never a good idea and could have lasting consequences. So here’s our friendly appeal to all Casino Guru community members: Stand up against unfair and dishonest casinos. Use our Complaints Resolution Center if you need help – you don’t have to fight alone. But please don’t try to get back money you’ve fairly lost. It’s simply not worth the risk. Thanks for being part of our community – and have a great day!
1...702 703 704...1,091
Add post
Educated_ant
7 months ago

Definitely keep fighting!!! I really hope everyone wins with them. I had over 2k with TSB but I backed out of raising it when I saw they’d closed someone’s account on here, might go back to raise it once I have more information

wafflezoo deleted the post
wafflezoo
7 months ago

You might struggle with that - they are showing as having active licenses on the gambling commission website


file

7 months ago

Unbelievably awful day for me. I raised chargebacks with the bank in November, I was upfront about the unlicensed casino, payments processed using wrong mmc ect. All chargebacks were declined. I took it to FOS under failure to notice unusual account activity and protect me from gambling related harm and failing to raise chargebacks on my behalf even though they are processed fraudulently. I received my report from FOS stating the bank is not responsible. I'm now in 85k debt and nowhere left to turn. I cannot see a way out of this situation, I at least had hope FOS would resolve some of my complaint but absolutely nothing. In a very black hole now

wafflezoo deleted the post
wafflezoo deleted the post
7 months ago

Please help! Looking for advice from similar cases


I have submitted a formal dispute with Barclays on charges made via debit card purchases. I have been honest with saying they were gambling payments made etc and raised the complaint with the misrepresentation argument and that the payments were circumvented. They have raised the dispute (good news) and it looks like they have raised it on good/services not received. They have now sent me a letter asking for confirmation of the dates the goods/services were due to be received.


What should I respond with? Any advice is greatly appreciated.

wafflezoo
7 months ago

No - they are licensed in the UK so you won’t have anything to go back to them with. Most of the Malta companies are

Heather123
7 months ago

I would go back with the dates the payments were taken. With it being digital goods they would usually be delivered within a few hours of purchase

wafflezoo
7 months ago

I'm in the process of trying to figure out the best way to go about things, unfortunately I'm a home owner and fear we may loose our home due to my failings. Severely struggling to understand how the banks and FOS can help some people but not others. This addiction has completely ruined my life. There are not set rules for help. I can't continue to fight or work threw this anymore, even when acting illegally it seems the house still wins

wafflezoo deleted the post
JosieRosie46
7 months ago

I’m just so confused because I’ve made my point initially that I did makes these payments but argued they were illegally processed. Then they have raised the dispute on goods not received and have asked for confirmation of the dates the goods/services were due to be received. I don’t have any confirmation from the merchant so I don’t know what to say

Heather123
7 months ago

Just explain you have not received any receipts from them etc.. the fact they have raised them as goods and services not received will actually work better in your favour.


What were the merchants names? I might be able to help with emails. If you send them an email explaining you have not received anything from them and you want a refund… they won’t reply and you upload the email as your proof

7 months ago

Merchant INPIGR1 - location is prague. If anyone knows who they are please let me know.

JosieRosie46
7 months ago

Thank you. It’s bistsent.eu

Heather123
7 months ago

[email protected]


send them an email requesting a full refund. Then screenshot the email and upload it stating they have ignored any correspondence you have sent to them 🙂


good luck

7 months ago

Might help with bank transfers - related uk case law


• R v. P (2015): In this case, the court found that a financial institution was guilty of facilitating illegal gambling transactions without proper due diligence. The case emphasized that financial institutions and payment processors must take steps to ensure their transactions are not linked to illegal activities.

• R v. Smith (2012): A payment processor was found liable for failing to ensure that transactions were lawful, underscoring the importance of compliance with legal obligations.

• National Crime Agency v. X (2017): The court highlighted the duty of payment providers to comply with Anti-Money Laundering obligations, and the failure to implement these checks could lead to violations of UK law, especially if suspicious transactions were not reported.


Edited
Wood28
7 months ago

Do you have an email address I could reach out to you on.

Anonymized915 deleted the post
Wood28 deleted the post
1...702 703 704...1,091
Go to pageof 1,091 pages

Add post

flash-message-reviews
User reviews – Write own casino reviews and share your experience
Trustpilot_flash_alt
What’s your opinion on Casino Guru? Share your feedback
PP Forum Xmas Competition flash 2025
Share your winnings from Pragmatic Play slots — we’re giving away prizes worth $3,000!

Follow us on social media – Daily posts, no deposit bonuses, new slots, and more

Subscribe to our newsletter for no deposit bonuses, free tournaments, new slots, and more.