Frankly, the amount you have wagered in the past does not matter much. The current state of things is important. Kindly keep that in mind.
Your complaint was rejected because you have wagered "maybe 100K" in sports betting, but because, according to your own words "recently got into their sportsbook" and more importaintly "After 2 of my bets hit and settled my accuont was susspended"
Can you feel the difference, please?
"if you don't cover sports book related complaints then how can you accurately give a review on a site without boldly informing your clients that this is not a review on the casinos sports book section…"
I'd say you are a victim of your own assumptions.
When we say we review casinos, how did you come to the idea that it also means sportsbook? The word "casino" or "casinos" is included in every article, guide, or safety index explanation. How many times have you seen "spots book", please?
We do not consider anything related to sports betting valid for our interest:
If I may add some kind of advice, investigate the given information first, e.g.:
How we review CASINOS 👈
How to choose CASINO 👈
Introduction to Online CASINOS 👈
Think about that, please.
Edited by author 9 months ago
Automatic translation: